PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

NYT Connections game: How to solve these deceivingly simple word puzzles, according to cognitive scientists

by Emiko Muraki and Penny Pexman
May 10, 2024
Reading Time: 4 mins read
(Photo credit: OpenAI's DALL·E)

(Photo credit: OpenAI's DALL·E)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Puzzle fans are hooked on Connections, the latest word game from the New York Times that launched in June 2023, following the success of Wordle. The premise of the Connections game is deceivingly simple: from a grid of 16 words, find four groups of four that each have something in common. So why does this game spark so much delight and frustration among players?

To solve Connections puzzles, players need to draw on different aspects of word knowledge like a word’s meaning, grammar (e.g. a noun or verb), and how the word is spelled or pronounced. This information is stored in what cognitive scientists refer to as our semantic memory. Our word knowledge is structured through associations that reflect different types of information and are formed through experience.

Screenshot of Connections game.
The Connections game on April 12, 2024. (New York Times)

 

Games like Connections require players to be flexible in how they access information in semantic memory in order to find new or remote associations between words. This involves creative thinking. More creative individuals have their semantic memory structured in a way that aids their ability to see novel connections.

Knowing how we retrieve word information can help Connections players avoid red herrings in the daily puzzles. Let’s examine some of the common types of solutions in the game and how they are related to storing and retrieving information in our semantic memory.

Synonyms

The easier puzzles (yellow and green) often require players to find words that have the same meaning. For instance, in the group: departed, left, split, went, the words are synonyms for “exited” (solution from March 28, 2024). This type of association can be developed through language experience. We hear or see thousands of words each day, and over time we learn that certain words tend to occur together or occur in similar contexts.

Cognitive scientists have quantified this similarity by using learning algorithms on large data sets of written and spoken natural language. These algorithms can predict human performance in tests of language processing such as semantic priming, where people are faster to recognize words that are preceded by a closely associated word (like recognizing “butter” if it is preceded by “bread”).

Semantic priming can help us quickly recognize related concepts, but it can also distract us from the puzzle’s solution. For example, the puzzle on March 23, 2024 included the words credit, discover and visa. These words are associated, in that Discover and Visa are types of credit cards, however the game solution had these words in different groups that required players to access a different meaning. Players need to be careful not to be distracted by semantic primes that do not lead to puzzle solutions.

Shared features

Shared features are another way the mind organizes knowledge. We know this because people are faster to make decisions about a word if they first briefly see a different word that shares similar features. People are also faster to recognize the unique features of things than features that are less distinctive. For example, hopping is a very distinctive feature of kangaroos and rabbits whereas having feet is not.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

Words in the game are often grouped together based on shared features or attributes. For example, in the group: anise, fennel, licorice, and tarragon players needed to identify the shared feature of “similar flavour” (solution from March 13, 2024).

When deciding if words share features in the game, players may need to think beyond distinctive or defining features that are the fastest to come to mind. The solution might involve a feature that is less distinctive for the given word, which makes these types of groups more challenging to solve.

For example, a puzzle on March 28 included the words ATM, casino, schedule and spatula in the category “things with slots.” Although all these items can have slots, slots are not necessarily a defining feature of a spatula. Fans of the game have expressed frustration when solutions involve these less defining features.

Multi-word phrases

More difficult puzzles (blue and purple) often require players to recognize that the four words can form phrases if combined with another word. For example, in the group: charley, crazy, dark and gift players needed to realize that each word can be paired with the word horse to create a phrase or idiom.

These puzzles tend to be more difficult because, while idioms such as “gift horse” can be directly retrieved from our semantic memory, it may be more effortful to retrieve the meaning using the individual words that comprise the idiom. Research shows that common phrases and idioms become unique entries in our memory, and their meaning is greater than simply the sum of their parts.

Puzzles involving synonyms or shared features can be solved by focusing on the meaning of the words that are presented. However, this strategy may cause difficulty when trying to solve puzzles that involve the creation of phrases or idioms, or when the solution involves identifying connected words hidden within the presented words.

Players who find themselves stuck on a blue or purple puzzle may want to focus less on the meaning of the presented word and more on the spelling of the words or thinking about what words or letters can be added to form new meanings.

Word games like Connections reflect the structure of our semantic memory. That structure helps us find solutions but can also interfere with our ability to make the more remote or novel connections the game sometimes requires. By considering the science behind how we associate words in our minds players can adapt their strategies to forge the easy and the difficult connections.The Conversation

 

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

RELATED

Pupil response can reveal the depths of depression
Cognitive Science

New research shows the brain relies on whole faces, not just eyes, to decode emotions

June 1, 2026
Sharing false political information is associated with heightened schizotypy
Cognitive Science

How partisan loyalty affects our ability to spot false claims

May 31, 2026
Researchers identify a peculiar tendency among insecure narcissists
Cognitive Science

New study suggests the brain applies different standards of beauty to paintings and architecture

May 31, 2026
Live music causes brain waves to synchronize more strongly with rhythm than recorded music
Cognitive Science

How learning to read alters the brain’s approach to spoken language

May 29, 2026
Social class narcissism linked to anti-psychiatry conspiracy theories
Cognitive Science

The psychology of paradoxical thinking: Extreme arguments in favor of a controversial topic can reduce overall support

May 28, 2026
New study reveals key psychological traits linked to generativity in older adults
Cognitive Science

The cognitive difference between amateur and expert chess players

May 26, 2026
Psychologists developed a 20-minute tool to help people reframe their depression as a source of strength
Cognitive Science

General intelligence and a strong work ethic are the best predictors of college grades

May 25, 2026
What 50 years of data say about the happiness of single parents
Cognitive Science

Does the smell of pine make you smarter?

May 24, 2026

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader. We also syndicate to Apple News.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • More than half of adults with ADHD in clinical settings have a co-occurring personality disorder
  • New study links parental indulgence to psychopathic and narcissistic traits in adulthood
  • How learning to read alters the brain’s approach to spoken language
  • The psychology of paradoxical thinking: Extreme arguments in favor of a controversial topic can reduce overall support
  • Men’s sexual desire peaks around age 40, large new study finds

Science of Money

  • Class isn’t dead: Your job title still predicts your wealth in Europe, a five-country study finds
  • Packing products tightly on shelves makes shoppers grab more flavors
  • When your job feels scriptable: How routine work and AI anxiety drain employee energy
  • Childhood obesity and the American Dream: New research links early weight to lower lifetime mobility
  • The brain chemical behind your money moves: How dopamine shapes financial choices

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc