Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive COVID-19

People implicitly associate masked faces with psychological distance, study finds

by Rachel Schepke
December 2, 2022
in COVID-19, Social Psychology
(Image by Alexandra_Koch from Pixabay)

(Image by Alexandra_Koch from Pixabay)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay informed on the latest psychology and neuroscience research—follow PsyPost on LinkedIn for daily updates and insights.

Published in Social Psychological and Personality Science, researchers found that people who wear masks tend to be viewed as more socially distant. The findings provide evidence of an implicit association between masked human faces and concepts related to psychological distance.

Since the outbreak of COVID-19, several public health measures have been implemented to help contain the spread of the virus, including social distancing, hygiene, and mask wearing. Little is known about how mask wearing affects human social cognition or how people mentally represent masked faces.

Face masks cover about 50-60% of people’s faces, thereby hiding many facial features. There is a challenge for perceivers navigating social situations when encountering someone wearing a face mask when the person relies on facial cues to gauge people’s emotions.

Researchers Ramzi Fatfouta and colleagues were interested in investigating whether masks are associated with psychological distance, such as feeling that someone is socially close or far away from oneself.

Fatfouta and colleagues recruited 354 German-speaking individuals to participate in four experiments that assessed social, spatial, temporal, and hypothetical distance, respectively. In all four experiments, participants completed an Implicit Association Test.

Participants were shown images of either masked or unmasked faces and were instructed to label each image as a “near people” or “distant people” as fast as they could. The order of images was the same for each participant. The visual stimuli consisted of four male and four female pictures with a neutral facial expression, equal attractiveness, and trustworthiness.

Results from this study show that, in all four experiments, participants were quicker to pair masked faces with distance and unmasked faces with close proximity. Participants were slower to match unmasked faces with distance and masked faces with close proximity. “Specifically, the experiments showed that masked faces were associated with distal entities (i.e., distant people, distant events, distant locations, and imaginary creatures) more than proximal entities (i.e., near people, near events, near locations, and real creatures),” the researchers explained.

The results suggest that people who wear face masks are implicitly viewed as being psychologically distant.

Considering previous research shows that ambiguous faces are represented schematically in a top-down manner, Fatfouta and colleagues suggest that people abstract representations of the face when parts of the face become occluded. On the other hand, revealed faces led perceivers to form a concrete representation of the face, which results in a subjective experience that the face is proximal, not distal.

Fatfouta and colleagues suggest that their research shows that wearing masks may be associated with different dimensions of psychological distance. Research shows that people who wear face masks tend to engage in more social distancing behaviors. Face masks may be a cue to others to keep a greater physical distance from them. Mask wearing is also often associated with unlikely or unreal worlds such as “fantasy and fiction”.

The researchers also argue that their findings suggest that incidental cues can influence people’s behavioral processes subconsciously. Furthermore, mask wearing may have undesirable social consequences.

Limitations of this study include the extent to which findings are generalizable, since the studies took place in Germany where the majority of people became accustomed to seeing others wearing masks. It is also unknown whether reactions to seeing other people wear masks reflect newly formed associations. Fatfouta and colleagues indicate that further research is needed to investigate when these implicit associations developed.

The study, “Keeping One’s Distance: Mask Wearing is Implicitly Associated With Psychological Distance“, was authored by Ramzi Fatfouta and Yaacov Trope.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

The neuroscience of why we cry happy tears
Social Psychology

The neuroscience of why we cry happy tears

June 20, 2025

Why do people cry happy tears? Neuroscience suggests these emotional outbursts occur when the brain becomes overwhelmed by joy, nostalgia, or relief. Far from being irrational, crying during joyful moments helps restore balance and deepen human connection.

Read moreDetails
Epistemic mistrust and dogmatism predict preference for authoritarian-looking leaders
Authoritarianism

Epistemic mistrust and dogmatism predict preference for authoritarian-looking leaders

June 20, 2025

A new study suggests that the way people learn to trust others early in life can shape their political ideology and preference for strong, dominant leaders—though not directly, but through dogmatic thinking and broader political attitudes.

Read moreDetails
Psychology researchers find that a simple “talking to strangers” intervention is surprisingly effective
Social Psychology

Simple social rituals like eye contact and small talk are psychologically powerful

June 19, 2025

A social psychology professor highlights how our daily habits—like wearing headphones or avoiding eye contact—can weaken social bonds. Even brief interactions with strangers can boost well-being, but only if we choose to engage rather than withdraw.

Read moreDetails
Individual traits, not environment, predict gun violence among gun-carrying youth
Political Psychology

Republican women and Democratic men often break with party lines on gun policy

June 19, 2025

New research shows that Americans’ views on gun policy are shaped by the intersection of gender and partisanship, with Republican women and Democratic men often expressing positions that differ from those typically associated with their party.

Read moreDetails
Attractive female students no longer earned higher grades when classes moved online during COVID-19
Social Psychology

Personality stays mostly the same after moving up in social class, new study suggests

June 18, 2025

In a long-term study of German youth, first-generation students who attended university became slightly more risk-averse. However, traits like conscientiousness, agreeableness, and openness developed similarly to peers from similar backgrounds who didn’t pursue higher education.

Read moreDetails
Troubling study shows “politics can trump truth” to a surprising degree, regardless of education or analytical ability
Donald Trump

Racial insecurity helped shield Trump from Republican backlash after Capitol riot, study suggests

June 18, 2025

Despite widespread condemnation of the January 6th attack, many white Republicans remained loyal to Trump—especially those who perceived anti-white discrimination. A new study shows how racial status threat can protect political leaders from the consequences of norm violations.

Read moreDetails
Some dark personality traits may help buffer against depression, new psychology research suggests
COVID-19

COVID-19 coverage linked to rise in anti-Asian sentiment, especially among Trump supporters

June 17, 2025

Americans became less favorable toward Asians as COVID-19 spread and news coverage intensified, according to a new study. The drop was strongest among Trump supporters, highlighting how political rhetoric and fear shaped public opinion during the pandemic.

Read moreDetails
Some dark personality traits may help buffer against depression, new psychology research suggests
Dark Triad

Some dark personality traits may help buffer against depression, new psychology research suggests

June 17, 2025

Dark traits like narcissism and psychopathy are often associated with dysfunction, but new findings reveal that certain facets—especially Machiavellian agency—might help people manage stress and depression more effectively through adaptive coping strategies.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

The neuroscience of why we cry happy tears

Scientists shed light on how forgiveness does and doesn’t reshape memories

Epistemic mistrust and dogmatism predict preference for authoritarian-looking leaders

Rare post-orgasm illness causes days-long flu-like symptoms, but research into its cause remains limited

Gut bacteria may play a causal role in obsessive-compulsive disorder, study suggests

Regular cannabis use linked to changes in brain activity regulating movement

Do AI tools undermine our sense of creativity? New study says yes

Simple social rituals like eye contact and small talk are psychologically powerful

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy