Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Moral Psychology

People who pledge 10% of their income to charity are more morally expansive and open-minded

by Mane Kara-Yakoubian
September 5, 2024
in Moral Psychology
(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Follow PsyPost on Google News

According to a new study, people who have taken the Giving What We Can (GWWC) pledge to donate at least 10% of their income to charity display distinct cognitive and personality traits. This research was published in the Journal of Personality.

Altruism has been a central focus of social science research, particularly the study of individuals whose moral concern for others far exceeds that of the typical population. These extraordinary altruists, who often make significant personal sacrifices to help others, challenge traditional evolutionary theories of altruism, which suggest that helping behaviors are motivated by potential future benefits or kin relationships. In this context, understanding the motivations and characteristics of those who pledge to donate a substantial portion of their income to charity provides valuable insights into the nature of altruistic behavior.

GWWC is an organization that encourages individuals to commit to donating at least 10% of their income to charity throughout their lives. Matti Wilks and colleagues sought to identify the cognitive and personality traits that distinguish these extraordinary altruists from the general population.

This research involved 536 participants from the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Germany, and the Netherlands, divided into two groups: 294 GWWC pledgers and 240 individuals from a country-matched control group. The researchers recruited 536 participants, including 294 GWWC pledgers and 240 individuals from a country-matched control group.

The control group was carefully selected to match the demographics of the GWWC pledgers, ensuring comparable groups in terms of country of residence. Participants completed a survey designed to measure a variety of cognitive and personality traits, including tasks to assess emotion recognition, specifically focusing on the ability to identify fearful facial expressions using images from the Radboud Faces Database.

Participants completed self-report questionnaires to measure moral expansiveness (the extent to which individuals extend moral concern to a broad range of entities), empathy and compassion levels, social dominance orientation (preference for hierarchical social structures), and maximizing tendencies (the pursuit of optimal outcomes). The survey also assessed actively open-minded thinking (willingness to revise beliefs based on new evidence), need for cognition (preference for engaging in complex thinking), and utilitarianism (the extent to which participants endorse principles that prioritize the greater good).

The study revealed several key differences between individuals who have taken the GWWC pledge and those in the control group. GWWC pledgers were significantly better at recognizing fearful facial expressions, a trait linked to heightened sensitivity to others’ emotional states and prosocial behavior. They also scored higher in moral expansiveness, indicating a broader scope of moral concern that extends beyond immediate social circles to include animals, plants, and the environment.

GWWC pledgers exhibited higher levels of actively open-minded thinking, demonstrating a greater willingness to consider different perspectives and revise their beliefs in light of new evidence. They also showed a stronger need for cognition, reflecting a preference for engaging in complex and thoughtful decision-making processes.

Contrary to the researchers’ expectations, GWWC pledgers scored lower on maximizing tendencies, suggesting that their altruistic behavior may be driven more by adherence to principles rather than a constant pursuit of optimal personal outcomes.

Overall, the results highlight that GWWC pledgers are characterized by a unique combination of cognitive traits that emphasize rational decision-making and a broad moral concern for others.

One limitation is that the study did not include measures of income or socioeconomic status, which may also play a role in explaining the differences observed.

The study, “Who gives? Characteristics of those who have taken the Giving What We Can pledge”, was authored by Matti Wilks, Jessica McCurdy, and Paul Bloom.

RELATED

Banned books and censorship in psychology research and education.
Moral Psychology

Moral absolutism explains support for bans better than conservative or liberal ideology

October 10, 2025
Scientists analyzed 38 million obituaries and found a hidden story about American values
Moral Psychology

New study across 20 countries suggests guilt, not shame, motivates generosity

October 5, 2025
Study reveals AI’s potential to detect loneliness by deciphering speech patterns
Artificial Intelligence

People are more likely to act dishonestly when delegating tasks to AI

September 26, 2025
Narcissistic grandiosity predicts greater involvement in LGBTQ activism
Moral Psychology

New psychology research finds leftist causes widely seen as more moral — even by conservatives

August 21, 2025
Traditional beliefs can shift the link between beauty and women’s sexual openness, new research suggests
Attractiveness

Traditional beliefs can shift the link between beauty and women’s sexual openness, new research suggests

August 14, 2025
Positive attitudes toward AI linked to problematic social media use
Cognitive Science

People with higher cognitive ability have weaker moral foundations, new study finds

July 7, 2025
AI can already diagnose depression better than a doctor and tell you which treatment is best
Artificial Intelligence

New research reveals hidden biases in AI’s moral advice

July 5, 2025
Brain boost from pecans? New study finds short-term cognitive benefits
Developmental Psychology

Moral self-concept in kindergarten predicts better social skills in early school years, study finds

June 12, 2025

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Elon Musk’s political persona linked to waning interest in Teslas among liberals

Prenatal exposure to common “forever chemicals” linked to changes in children’s brain structure

Long-term ayahuasca use linked to distinct emotional brain activity and higher resilience

Negativity drives engagement on political TikTok

Lower IQ in youth predicts higher alcoholism risk in adulthood

Cannabidiol may ease Alzheimer’s-related brain inflammation and improve cognition

This happens in your brain when you change your mind, according to neuroscience

Vegetarians tend to value achievement and power more than meat-eaters, study finds

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy