Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Relationships and Sexual Health Attachment Styles

People with insecure attachment are more likely to form illusory, parasocial relationships with TV characters

by Beth Ellwood
September 17, 2021
in Attachment Styles, Parasocial Relationships, Social Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay on top of the latest psychology findings: Subscribe now!

According to findings from the Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, the way we engage with fictional characters is in part a reflection of our attachment styles. The study revealed that people who are high in anxious or avoidant attachment are more likely to form illusory reciprocal relationships with their favorite TV characters, suggesting that bonding with story characters can help relieve attachment insecurity.

Connecting to a great story through a book, a TV show, or another medium can mentally transport us to a whole new scene, offering an escape from reality. According to previous psychology work, the extent that people tend to get immersed in a story can be predicted by attachment style. Study authors Marina Rain and Raymond A. Mar wondered whether the tendency to become engrossed with a story character can also be predicted by attachment.

The early bond between an infant and their caregiver influences the way a child grows to view and respond to relationships in later life — something psychologists refer to as attachment styles. Rain and Mar proposed that bonding with story characters offers a way to appease insecure attachment since stories allow people to form close bonds with fictional others without worry of rejection. The researchers specifically opted to study whether the anxious and avoidant attachment styles might influence the extent that people identify with characters and develop illusory relationships with them.

In a first study among 150 college students, the researchers had participants name a favorite TV character and then answer questions about their feelings toward that character and their relationship with the character. The students also completed assessments of anxious and avoidant attachment.

It was found that participants who scored higher in either anxious or avoidant attachment also scored higher in parasocial interaction — the tendency to feel an illusory reciprocal relationship with a character while consuming the media. Moreover, those with high attachment anxiety had a greater tendency to form a parasocial relationship with their favorite character — an illusory, friendship-like relationship that extends beyond the consumption of the media (e.g., ‘I think my favorite TV personality is like an old friend.’). Those high in avoidance, on the other hand, identified with their favorite character to a greater extent.

Importantly, these effects remained after controlling for the personality traits of extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism — suggesting a unique role for attachment style.

The authors took these findings as evidence that the way people engage with characters is aligned with their social experiences in the real world. For example, people with attachment anxiety tend to crave warmth and attention from their intimate relationships, and parasocial relationships might provide a safe avenue for them to achieve this. People with avoidant attachment, on the other hand, crave distance from relationships and may find solace in identifying with characters that enjoy independence and autonomy.

A second study offered evidence for this idea that engaging with story characters can assuage attachment concerns. This time, participants completed measures of attachment style and personality — not just for themselves, but for a favorite TV character. It was found that respondents who were more anxiously attached had favorite characters who were more invested in interpersonal relationships, suggesting that people with this style of attachment prefer characters who are nurturing and supportive of intimate partners. Respondents who were more avoidantly attached had favorite characters who were more autonomous, suggesting that people with this style of attachment prefer to identify with characters who boost their feelings of independence.

Rain and Mar conclude that attachment styles seem to impact the way we interact with stories and their characters. Future studies could use experiments to study whether character identification appeases certain concerns associated with attachment insecurity.

The study, “Adult attachment and engagement with fictional characters”, was authored by Marina Rain and Raymond A. Mar.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin28ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Racial and religious differences help explain why unmarried voters lean Democrat
Political Psychology

Student loan debt doesn’t deter civic engagement — it may actually drive it, new research suggests

July 3, 2025

Americans with student loan debt are more likely to vote and engage in political activities than those without debt, likely because they see government as responsible and capable of addressing their financial burden through policy change.

Read moreDetails
Scientists just uncovered a surprising illusion in how we remember time
Infidelity

Not bothered by celebrity infidelity? This psychological trait might be why

July 3, 2025

The online shaming of unfaithful celebrities is a modern spectacle, but why do some join in while others don't? Researchers exploring this puzzle found a key predictor: a belief in a just world, which unexpectedly dampens outrage and blame.

Read moreDetails
Scientists just uncovered a surprising illusion in how we remember time
Mental Health

New research suggests the conservative mental health advantage is a myth

July 3, 2025

Do conservatives really have better mental well-being than liberals? A new study suggests the answer depends entirely on how you ask. The well-known ideological gap disappears when "mental health" is replaced with the less-stigmatized phrase "overall mood."

Read moreDetails
Authoritarianism in parents may hinder a key cognitive skill in their children
Attachment Styles

New research suggests interparental conflict can spill over into a mother’s parenting style

July 2, 2025

A new study shows that when mothers experience hostile conflict with their partner, they may feel less emotionally secure—an effect that predicts harsher discipline toward their children. Fathers showed no similar pattern in parenting behavior.

Read moreDetails
New psychology study sheds light on mysterious “feelings of presence” during isolation
Political Psychology

People who think “everyone agrees with me” are more likely to support populism

July 1, 2025

People who wrongly believe that most others share their political views are more likely to support populist ideas, according to a new study. These false beliefs can erode trust in democratic institutions and fuel resentment toward political elites.

Read moreDetails
Researchers identify neural mechanism behind memory prioritization
Social Psychology

People who are more likely to die seem to care less about the future

June 30, 2025

Individuals with higher mortality risk—as judged by actuarial life insurance data—tend to care less about long-term consequences. They show more impulsivity and less future planning, consistent with evolutionary theories that link time horizon to environmental and internal health cues.

Read moreDetails
Scientists show how you’re unknowingly sealing yourself in an information bubble
Cognitive Science

Scientists show how you’re unknowingly sealing yourself in an information bubble

June 29, 2025

Scientists have found that belief polarization doesn’t always come from misinformation or social media bubbles. Instead, it often begins with a simple search. Our choice of words—and the algorithm’s response—can subtly seal us inside our own informational comfort zones.

Read moreDetails
Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds
Political Psychology

Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds

June 28, 2025

A new study finds that voters are more motivated by radical political leaders than moderates, because supporting bold causes makes them feel personally significant—driving greater activism, sacrifice, and long-term engagement across elections in the United States and Poland.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Student loan debt doesn’t deter civic engagement — it may actually drive it, new research suggests

Understanding “neuronal ensembles” could revolutionize addiction treatment

Not bothered by celebrity infidelity? This psychological trait might be why

Genetic factors may influence how well exercise buffers against childhood trauma

Tips for parents in talking with your kids about your partner’s mental illness

Subjective cognitive struggles strongly linked to social recovery in depression

New research suggests the conservative mental health advantage is a myth

FACT CHECK: Does cheese cause nightmares? Here’s what the science actually says

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy