PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Predicting Relationship Breakups With a Word-Association Task

by Association for Psychological Science
July 7, 2010
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

breakupsHere’s a way to tell a romantic relationship is going to fall apart: find out what people really think about their partners. The researchers in a new study used a so-called implicit task, which shows how people automatically respond to words – in this case, whether they find it easier to link words referring to their partner to words with pleasant or unpleasant meanings.

Most research on relationship success has focused on how the people in the relationship feel about each other. And this is usually done by the obvious route: asking them.

“But the difficulty with that is, that assumes that they know themselves how happy they are, and that’s not always the case,” says Ronald D. Rogge, of the University of Rochester. “To make things worse, a lot of people don’t want to tell you if they’re starting to feel less happy in their relationship.” So he and his colleagues Soonhee Lee and Harry T. Reis turned to a technique often used to assess racism and bias, other feelings people have trouble admitting to themselves and to researchers.

The 222 volunteers in their study were all involved in a romantic relationship. Each volunteer supplied the partner’s first name and two other words that related to the partner, like a pet name or a distinctive characteristic. Then they watched a monitor as three types of words were presented one at a time – good words (like peace, vacation, or sharing), bad words (such as death, tragedy, and criticizing), and partner-related words (names or traits).

There were two different kinds of tests: one where the volunteer was supposed to press the space bar whenever they saw either good words or partner-related words, and one where the combination was bad words and partner words. The idea is to get at people’s automatic reactions to the words – if they have generally good associations with their partners, they should be able to do the first task more easily than the second.

The researchers found that volunteers who found it easy to associate their partner with bad things and difficult to associate the partner with good things were more likely to separate over the next year. The researchers also asked volunteers to report on the strength of their relationships at the start of the study – and found that the new test did a much better job of predicting breakup.

“It really is giving us a unique glimpse into how people were feeling about their partners – giving us information that they were unable or unwilling to report,” says Rogge.

The research is published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources
TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Long-term study reveals how childhood ADHD impacts adult mental health, cognition, and daily life
  • People with elevated ADHD traits miss out on an automatic learning advantage, study finds
  • Learning a new skill triggers both temporary cell swelling and lasting structural growth in the human brain
  • New study links digital “brain rot” to a cascading sequence of psychological burdens
  • Scientists identify five key factors linked to happiness across 66 countries

Science of Money

  • When a “green” surcharge backfires: Why donating fees to charity can undermine the policies they support
  • Attention has a price: New research links retail investor interest to earnings management
  • What kinds of aid actually help women? A look at 93 trials across 45 countries
  • New study finds narcissistic CEOs quietly derail their firms’ global ambitions
  • Dark personality traits, work alienation, and the urge to quit

Recent

  • Men are more likely than women to view infidelity favorably when relationships falter
  • Researchers link phubbing to higher sexual distress in women
  • Brain structure differences in autism map onto serotonin receptor locations
  • New expert consensus highlights the role of circadian rhythms in treating bipolar disorder
  • The hidden business of the submissive internet “tradwife”
  • ADHD might remain underdiagnosed in England despite recent surge in recorded cases
  • New research sheds light on how feeling forgiven by God shapes relationship repair
  • The psychology of jealousy: Study explores how perceived mate value is linked to relationship conflict
  • Scientists reveal what is actually happening to your body when you let out a random sigh
  • Brain “noise” during speech processing is linked to verbal communication skills in autistic youth

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc