PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Predicting Relationship Breakups With a Word-Association Task

by Association for Psychological Science
July 7, 2010
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

breakupsHere’s a way to tell a romantic relationship is going to fall apart: find out what people really think about their partners. The researchers in a new study used a so-called implicit task, which shows how people automatically respond to words – in this case, whether they find it easier to link words referring to their partner to words with pleasant or unpleasant meanings.

Most research on relationship success has focused on how the people in the relationship feel about each other. And this is usually done by the obvious route: asking them.

“But the difficulty with that is, that assumes that they know themselves how happy they are, and that’s not always the case,” says Ronald D. Rogge, of the University of Rochester. “To make things worse, a lot of people don’t want to tell you if they’re starting to feel less happy in their relationship.” So he and his colleagues Soonhee Lee and Harry T. Reis turned to a technique often used to assess racism and bias, other feelings people have trouble admitting to themselves and to researchers.

The 222 volunteers in their study were all involved in a romantic relationship. Each volunteer supplied the partner’s first name and two other words that related to the partner, like a pet name or a distinctive characteristic. Then they watched a monitor as three types of words were presented one at a time – good words (like peace, vacation, or sharing), bad words (such as death, tragedy, and criticizing), and partner-related words (names or traits).

There were two different kinds of tests: one where the volunteer was supposed to press the space bar whenever they saw either good words or partner-related words, and one where the combination was bad words and partner words. The idea is to get at people’s automatic reactions to the words – if they have generally good associations with their partners, they should be able to do the first task more easily than the second.

The researchers found that volunteers who found it easy to associate their partner with bad things and difficult to associate the partner with good things were more likely to separate over the next year. The researchers also asked volunteers to report on the strength of their relationships at the start of the study – and found that the new test did a much better job of predicting breakup.

“It really is giving us a unique glimpse into how people were feeling about their partners – giving us information that they were unable or unwilling to report,” says Rogge.

The research is published in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources
TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • People with low implicit self-worth are quicker to notice subtle facial cues of anger and disgust
  • High testosterone is linked to “loss chasing” behavior after setbacks
  • Screen time and cognitive skills often predict each other over time, but the pattern varies by child
  • What neuroscientists thought was a biological signature for IQ might actually be socioeconomic privilege
  • Musical compatibility often outshines personality matching in romantic couples

Science of Money

  • The minute-by-minute mechanics of live-stream sales
  • The unintended consequences of international aid on bank stability
  • How the baby boom generation shaped a 50-year wage slump for young workers
  • Chatbots outperform traditional landing pages in business-to-business lead generation
  • How sideline investors shape stock market prices

Recent

  • Advanced math for whom? Study shows wealth rivals academic readiness in high school tracking
  • Psychologists pinpoint the dividing line between problematic romance and severe love addiction
  • Parents with two daughters report the highest levels of happiness, Chinese study finds
  • Religious women are more receptive to potential partners on dating apps, study suggests
  • The human brain clears fluid directly into the skull, and poor sleep slows the process down
  • Does exercise really slow brain aging? A new study complicates the narrative
  • Negative religious coping is linked to a mind-body disconnect during acute stress
  • Mapping the relay stations of human consciousness
  • What actually happens to your nervous system when you get a back massage
  • Daily variations in salivary cortisol may predict cognitive decline in older adults

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc