Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

Reading literary versus popular fiction promotes different socio-cognitive processes, study suggests

by Beth Ellwood
October 26, 2020
in Cognitive Science
(Image by Ina Hall from Pixabay)

(Image by Ina Hall from Pixabay)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Don't miss out! Follow PsyPost on Bluesky!

A study published in PLOS One suggests that the type of fiction a person reads affects their social cognition in different ways. Specifically, literary fiction was associated with increased attributional complexity and accuracy in predicting social attitudes, while popular fiction was linked to increased egocentric bias.

“We learn a lot about ourselves, interpersonal relations, how institutions work, etc., from fiction. In other words, fiction impacts what we think about the world. But in my research, I am interested in the ways in which fiction shapes how we think,” explained study author Emanuele Castano of the University of Trento and the National Research Council in Italy.

“The original work, published with my former student David Kidd in the journal Science, showed that not all fiction shapes how we think in the same way. We distinguished between literary (e.g. Don Delillo, Jonathan Franzen, Alice Munroe) and popular fiction (e.g. Dan Brown, Tom Clancy, Jackie Collins), and showed that it is by reading literary fiction that you enhance your mindreading abilities — you are better at inferring and representing what other people think, feel, their intentions, etc.”

“In the latest article, with my former student Alison Jane Martingano and philosopher Pietro Perconti, we broaden the spectrum of variables we look at, and most importantly we develop our argument about the two types of fiction and their role in our society,” Castano said.

Scholars have typically differentiated between literary and popular fiction. For example, engaging with literary fiction is thought to be active; it asks readers to search for meaning and produce their own perspectives and involves complex characters. Popular fiction, on the other hand, is passive; it provides meaning for the readers and is more concerned with plot than characters.

Consequently, as Castano and team propose, literary and popular fiction likely affect cognition in different ways.

The researchers conducted a study involving 493 individuals with an average age of 34. Subjects completed a version of the Author Recognition Test where they were asked to indicate which authors they were familiar with among an extensive list of authors. Subjects were then given scores based on how many literary fiction versus popular fiction authors they recognized.

Next, the subjects completed a measure of Attributional Complexity, a construct which, “includes the motivation to understand human behavior, along with the preference for complex explanations of it.” They further took part in a false consensus paradigm to measure their egocentric bias — the extent to which they believe others share the same thoughts and attitudes as they do. Finally, their mental state recognition was assessed through the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), a task measuring their accuracy in recognizing a person’s mental state based on that person’s eyes.

The results revealed key differences between respondents who engaged with literary fiction and those who read popular fiction. As the researchers expected, reading literary fiction was a positive predictor of attributional complexity, while popular fiction was a negative predictor. As the authors discuss, because literary fiction “paints a more complex picture of human affairs, and of the human psyche, than popular fiction . . . we should find that readers of literary fiction develop more complex schemas about others, their behavior, and about the social world they inhabit.”

Also in line with the researchers’ predictions, exposure to literary fiction was linked to reduced egocentric bias, while popular fiction was not. “Compared to popular fiction,” the authors explain, “literary fiction is theorized to encourage the simultaneous entertaining of a multiplicity of perspectives. To take into consideration other perspectives should reduce the tendency to see our own construals as objective, and thus to rely less on them when making attributions about others and predicting their behavior.”

Finally, being exposed to literary fiction predicted better accuracy in recognizing others’ mental states (via the RMET), while popular fiction did not. “If a tendency to consider and appreciate other perspectives reduces ego-centric biases,” the researchers reason, “it should therefore enhance accuracy, which we define as the capacity to accurately represent others’ opinion, beliefs, intentions, emotion or attitudes at the individual mind level, or at the social level.”

“Exposure to literary fiction, as opposed to popular fiction, predicts the degree of complexity with which you analyze the social world. Exposure to popular fiction seems to, in fact, reduce it. Those who read relatively more literary fiction are also more accurate when they estimate other people’s average opinion,” Castano told PsyPost.

The researchers caution against inferring that literary fiction is inherently better than popular fiction. Instead, they stress that the two types of fiction cultivate different — and, in both cases, meaningful — socio-cognitive processes.

“Most importantly, the reader should take away what we are not saying: We are not saying that literary fiction is better than popular fiction. As human beings, we need the two types of thinking that are trained by these two types of fiction. The literary type pushes us to assess others as unique individuals, to withhold judgment, to think deeply. It is important, but it can paralyze us in our attempt to navigate the social world. The popular type reinforces our socially-learned and culturally-shared schemas; a mode of thinking that roughly corresponds to what Nobel Laureate Daniel Kahneman calls System 1: fast, automatic, well-practiced,” Castano explained.

“I submit that for a well functioning society a continuous tension between these two types of thinking styles – and thus both types of cultural products that, among other factors, promote them. Too much literary, and we disintegrate as a society. Too much popular, and we ossify. Neither scenario is auspicable.”

The researchers acknowledge that the Author Recognition Test is an imperfect measure of fiction reading, but offers limited social desirability and allows for the discrimination between popular and literary fiction.

“Some of our evidence comes from experimental work, so we are quite confident of the causal effect: reading literary fiction leads to stronger Theory of Mind, for instance. Other findings are correlational: we measure exposure to types of fiction, rather than manipulating exposure experimentally. Therefore, there are potential alternative explanations for our findings,” Castano said.

“We do our best, and control statistically for other variables, such as level of education, age, type of major — this last one is particularly important when studying the effect of literature. But there is always the possibility that we have missed something. Our colleagues, however, will be quick to point that out! But that is a good thing, for scientific progress is a cumulative enterprise”

“The goal is not for me to be right, but for us collectively, as cognitive scientists in this case, to be able to uncover the fascinating relationship between how the very cultural products that we develop in turn affect the way we think,” Castano added.

The study, “The effect of exposure to fiction on attributional complexity, egocentric bias and accuracy in social perception“, was authored by Emanuele Castano, Alison Jane Martingano, and Pietro Perconti.

(Image by Ina Hall from Pixabay)

TweetSendScanShareSendPin16ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Scientists observe lasting cognitive deficits in long COVID patients
Cognitive Science

Therapeutic video game shows promise for post-COVID cognitive recovery

May 20, 2025

A new study finds that a therapeutic video game, AKL-T01, improved task-switching and processing speed in people with post-COVID cognitive deficits. While sustained attention did not improve, participants reported better quality of life and reduced fatigue after six weeks of gameplay.

Read moreDetails
Brain oscillations reveal dynamic shifts in creative thought during metaphor generation
Cognitive Science

Brain oscillations reveal dynamic shifts in creative thought during metaphor generation

May 19, 2025

A new study reveals that creative metaphor generation involves shifting patterns of brain activity, with alpha oscillations playing a key role at different stages of the process, offering fresh insight into the neural dynamics behind verbal creativity.

Read moreDetails
Surprisingly widespread brain activity supports economic decision-making, new study finds
Cognitive Science

Surprisingly widespread brain activity supports economic decision-making, new study finds

May 19, 2025

A new study using direct brain recordings reveals that human economic decision-making is not localized to a single brain region. Instead, multiple areas work together, with high-frequency activity encoding risk, reward probability, and the final choice itself.

Read moreDetails
Scientists use brain activity to predict StarCraft II skill in fascinating new neuroscience research
Cognitive Science

Scientists use brain activity to predict StarCraft II skill in fascinating new neuroscience research

May 16, 2025

A study combining brain scans and gameplay data reveals that players with more efficient visual attention and stronger white matter connections excel at StarCraft II. The results highlight how neural traits shape success in cognitively demanding video games.

Read moreDetails
Neuroscientists discover music’s hidden power to reshape memory
Memory

Neuroscientists discover music’s hidden power to reshape memory

May 14, 2025

A new neuroimaging study reveals that listening to emotionally charged music during memory recall can change how we remember events. The music not only shaped what participants remembered but also altered the emotional tone of their memories one day later.

Read moreDetails
Study links anomalous experiences to subconscious connectedness and other psychological traits
Cognitive Science

Study links anomalous experiences to subconscious connectedness and other psychological traits

May 13, 2025

A new study suggests that unusual experiences like déjà vu or premonitions are not only common but linked to a distinct psychological trait called subconscious connectedness. Researchers found that people high in this trait reported significantly more anomalous experiences.

Read moreDetails
Eye-tracking study suggests that negative comments on social media are more attention-grabbing than positive comments
Cognitive Science

Can you train your brain to unsee optical illusions? Scientists think so

May 12, 2025

A recent study found that radiologists are less susceptible to optical illusions, likely due to their intensive visual training. The research challenges long-standing beliefs that illusions are automatic and suggests perceptual skills can be shaped over time.

Read moreDetails
Diets high in fat and sugar appear to harm cognitive function
Cognitive Science

Diets high in fat and sugar appear to harm cognitive function

May 10, 2025

Consuming a Western-style diet packed with sugar and saturated fats may hurt your brain, not just your waistline. A new study shows poorer performance on spatial memory tasks among people with diets high in processed, unhealthy foods.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

What brain scans reveal about the neural correlates of pornography consumption

AI chatbots often misrepresent scientific studies — and newer models may be worse

Is gender-affirming care helping or harming mental health?

Study finds “zombie” neurons in the peripheral nervous system contribute to chronic pain

Therapeutic video game shows promise for post-COVID cognitive recovery

Passive scrolling linked to increased anxiety in teens, study finds

Your bodily awareness guides your morality, new neuroscience study suggests

Where you flirt matters: New research shows setting shapes romantic success

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy