Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

Research study validates neuroreader for accurate and fast measurement of brain volumes

by IOS Press
October 20, 2015
in Cognitive Science
Photo credit: Naeblys/Fotolia

Photo credit: Naeblys/Fotolia

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

A new neuroimaging software, Neuroreader, was shown to be as accurate as traditional methods for detecting the slightest changes in brain volume, and does so in a fraction of the time, according to a research study published in the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease this month. The research validates the software program that can be used for measuring hippocampal volume, a biomarker for detecting Alzheimer’s Disease.

The study, which was conducted earlier this year by a team of 10 researchers, neurologists, radiologists and other healthcare professionals, representing six different organizations, sought to test the accuracy and speed of the Neuroreader software in detecting changes in brain volume on MRIs. Neuroreader, a product of Denmark-based medical technology company Brainreader, is a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-cleared software program for assessment of clinical volume on brain MRIs.

Titled, “Quantitative Neuroimaging Software for Clinical Assessment of Hippocampal Volumes on MR Imaging,” the research was performed independently in Denmark and at the Medical College of Wisconsin, with both studies producing similar results. One of the study’s lead authors and the inventor of Neuroreader, Dr. Jamila Ahdidan, conducted a study at her Brainreader labs, while Edgar A. DeYoe, PhD, a professor in the Department of Radiology at the Medical College of Wisconsin, replicated the study independently in his facility.

Research compared the results of 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI scans processed by Neuroreader with those which were traced manually by expert anatomists and radiologists. Prior to the onset of neuroimaging software, manual tracing has been the “gold standard” — the most accurate method — used among healthcare professionals.

Measuring the level of spatial overlap between Neuroreader and “gold standard” manual segmentation, Neuroreader was on average more than 87% accurate in its agreement with the gold standard method, but could accomplish this task in a fraction of the time – in about 5 minutes per scan compared to 30 minutes for manual segmentation.

The study’s results indicate that neuroimaging software, because it allows radiologists to quickly detect subtle changes in brain volumes, can be a vital tool in the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s and other degenerative brain diseases.

“For more than 30 years, since the development of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging scanner, the MRI has been the go-to test equipment to find abnormalities in brain volume, which provides strong indication of brain trauma or disease,” said Dr. Oscar Lopez, of the University of Pittsburgh’s Department of Neurology. “Neuroreader adds value to any MRI scanner by providing fast and accurate measurements of brain structure.”

David Merrill, a geriatric psychiatrist at UCLA said, “In applying Neuroreader to my patients with memory loss what I find it most useful for is helping me understand which patients do not have Alzheimer’s. Many persons with psychiatric disorders but not Alzheimer’s have cognitive problems.”

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

Dr. Dale E. Bredesen, Professor of Neurology at UCLA and founding President and CEO of the Buck Institute for Research on Aging, said, “Regional brain volumes are critical, not only for identifying and differentiating neurodegenerative processes such as Alzheimer’s disease, but also for documenting successful therapeutic approaches.”

According to John L. Ulmer, MD, Director of Neuroradiology at the Medical College of Wisconsin, “People at risk for Alzheimer’s dementia need to know their hippocampal volumes as an important number – just as someone at risk for a heart attack would need to know their cholesterol count.”

Previous Post

First mouse model of spontaneous depression-like episodes shows new candidate brain region

Next Post

Fly brains reveal the neural pathway by which outside stimuli become behavior

RELATED

How common is anal sex? Scientific facts about prevalence, pain, pleasure, and more
Cognitive Science

New psychology research reveals that wisdom acts as a moral compass for creative thinking

March 6, 2026
Hemp-derived cannabigerol shows promise in reducing anxiety — and maybe even improving memory
Alcohol

Using cannabis to cut back on alcohol? Your working memory might dictate if it works

March 5, 2026
Chocolate lovers’ brains: How familiarity influences reward processing
Cognitive Science

A single dose of cocoa flavanols improves cognitive performance during aerobic exercise

March 4, 2026
Heart and brain illustration with electrocardiogram waves, representing cardiovascular health and neurological connection, suitable for psychology and medical research articles.
Cognitive Science

Fascinating new research reveals your heart rate drops when your brain misperceives the world

March 4, 2026
Colorful digital illustration of a human brain with neon wireframe lines, representing neuroscience, psychology, and brain research. Ideal for psychology news, brain health, and cognitive sciences articles.
Cognitive Science

New research on acquired aphantasia pinpoints specific brain network responsible for visual imagination

March 3, 2026
Traumatic brain injury may steer Alzheimer’s pathology down a different path
Cognitive Science

Growing up with solid cooking fuels linked to long-term brain health risks

March 1, 2026
The disturbing impact of exposure to 8 minutes of TikTok videos revealed in new study
Cognitive Science

Problematic TikTok use correlates with social anxiety and daily cognitive errors

March 1, 2026
Why most people fail to spot AI-generated faces, while super-recognizers have a subtle advantage
Artificial Intelligence

Why most people fail to spot AI-generated faces, while super-recognizers have a subtle advantage

February 28, 2026

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Employees who feel attractive are more likely to share ideas at work

New psychology research reveals that wisdom acts as a moral compass for creative thinking

Long-term ADHD medication use does not appear to permanently alter the developing brain

Using cannabis to cut back on alcohol? Your working memory might dictate if it works

Conservatives underestimate the environmental impact of sustainable behaviors compared to liberals

American issue polarization surged after 2008 as the left moved further left

Psychological network analysis reveals how inner self-compassion connects to outward social attitudes

New neuroscience study links visual brain network hyperactivity to social anxiety

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc