Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology Authoritarianism

Right-wing authoritarianism linked to perceived threat from minoritized groups, but national context matters

by Eric W. Dolan
February 3, 2025
in Authoritarianism
(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay on top of the latest psychology findings: Subscribe now!

Individuals who strongly endorse right-wing authoritarianism are more likely to view minority groups as a threat, according to new research published in the British Journal of Social Psychology. This tendency was evident across various countries and cultures, but it was more pronounced in countries that were less religious or had lower levels of social marginalization. The study sheds new light on how right-wing authoritarianism interacts with sociocultural factors to shape perceptions of threat from refugees and other outgroups.

Right-wing authoritarianism refers to a belief system that emphasizes adherence to traditional values and authorities while supporting punishment for those perceived as challenging social cohesion. Previous research has established a consistent link between right-wing authoritarianism and negative attitudes toward minoritized groups, such as refugees and religious minorities. However, little was known about how broader sociocultural factors shape or moderate this relationship.

The researchers sought to address this gap by investigating whether and how right-wing authoritarianism, religiosity, and perceived societal marginalization contribute to perceptions that minoritized groups pose a threat. They also examined whether these factors interact at both individual and country levels. Given the rise of right-wing movements and increasing global displacement due to conflict and economic instability, understanding these dynamics has important implications for social cohesion and public policy.

“There is a long tradition of associating right-wing authoritarianism with negative perceptions of minoritized groups,” said study author Fahima Farkhari, a research associate at the University of Münster and member of Professor Mitja Back’s lab. “Negative perceptions include perceptions that minoritized groups, such as refugees and immigrants, pose a threat. Few studies have explored variations of the authoritarianism-threat link across countries and the related questions whether and how individual- and country-level sociocultural factors add to and moderate the influence of right-wing authoritarianism on such threat perceptions.”

The research consisted of three large-scale studies that examined how right-wing authoritarianism, religiosity, and perceived societal marginalization contribute to perceptions that minoritized groups pose a threat. The studies varied in scope, ranging from national and regional surveys to a global study that included both cross-sectional and longitudinal daily assessments.

Study 1 was conducted in Germany and comprised two separate samples collected from online survey panels, totaling 1,896 participants. After excluding respondents who were not Christian or did not have German citizenship, the final sample included 923 participants in the first wave and 973 in the second. This study measured perceived threat from refugees using a scale that assessed three dimensions of threat: symbolic (e.g., perceived incompatibility of values), realistic (e.g., economic competition), and safety (e.g., concerns about public security).

Right-wing authoritarianism was measured using a validated scale that captures adherence to traditional authority and social conformity. Religiosity was assessed with a single item asking respondents to rate their level of religious belief on a seven-point scale. Perceived societal marginalization, which refers to individuals’ perceptions that people like them are economically, culturally, and politically marginalized, was measured using a 15-item scale.

Study 2 extended the investigation to a broader European context, collecting data from 3,227 participants in Germany, France, Poland, and Sweden. The study employed computer-assisted telephone interviews to gather responses from a nationally representative sample in each country. Unlike Study 1, this study assessed perceived threat from both refugees and Muslims, given that political and media discourse often frames these groups differently.

The measure of perceived threat included six items for Muslims and three for refugees, which were later combined due to their strong correlation. Right-wing authoritarianism was again measured using a three-item subset of the previously validated scale. Religiosity and perceived societal marginalization were measured similarly to Study 1, though the perceived societal marginalization scale was shortened to six items to fit the telephone survey format.

Study 3 adopted a global perspective, drawing from 3,154 participants across 41 countries, with a total of more than 52,000 daily assessments of threat perceptions. This study utilized data from the “Coping with Corona” project, which collected responses via an online survey platform. Participants first completed a presurvey assessing their ideological beliefs, religiosity, and perceptions of marginalization. Following this, they participated in a four-week daily diary study in which they reported their perceived threat from minoritized groups each day. This allowed researchers to examine whether the cross-sectional associations observed in the first two studies held at a more immediate, day-to-day level.

Country-level religiosity was assessed using an index that measured the proportion of people in each country who reported that religion was important in their daily lives. Country-level marginalization was estimated using economic, cultural, and political indicators, including income inequality (Gini index), civil liberties ratings, and measures of political participation.

Across all three studies, the researchers found a consistent and strong positive relationship between right-wing authoritarianism and perceptions that minority groups are threatening. In other words, individuals who scored higher on right-wing authoritarianism were significantly more likely to perceive minority groups as a threat. This finding held true whether the minority group in question was refugees, Muslims, or other ethnic, religious, or national groups.

The researchers also explored the roles of religiosity and perceived societal marginalization in shaping threat perceptions. They found that individuals who felt more marginalized in society – economically, culturally, or politically – were also more likely to perceive minority groups as threatening. This suggests that a sense of being left behind or excluded can contribute to negative attitudes toward minority groups.

The relationship between religiosity and threat perceptions was less clear-cut. While there was some evidence that more religious individuals were slightly more likely to perceive threats, this relationship was not consistent across all samples.

“Right-wing authoritarian individuals tend to perceive minoritized groups (i.e., individuals of an ethnic, religious, or national minority) as a threat,” Farkhari told PsyPost. “In our studies, this tendency has been found to be strong across several countries. This relationship also holds when additionally considering the individuals’ religiosity and their feeling of being marginalized. That is, those threat perceptions can be explained by right-wing authoritarianism over and above religiosity and feelings of societal depreciation.”

One of the main goals of the study was to see if individual levels of religiosity and perceived societal marginalization might alter the relationship between right-wing authoritarianism and threat perceptions. The results here were mixed. There was limited evidence that individuals who were both highly religious and highly authoritarian were more likely to see minority groups as threatening. Similarly, in a few cases, individuals who were both highly marginalized and highly authoritarian showed an increased tendency to perceive threats. However, these effects were small and not consistent across all the studies.

“Whereas our data leave no doubt that individual-level right-wing authoritarianism is a strong overall predictor of majority groups’ perceptions of threat from minoritized groups, the effect sizes still varied considerably across the individual samples,” Farkhari noted

At the country level, the researchers found more consistent patterns. The positive relationship between right-wing authoritarianism and perceived threat was weaker in countries with higher levels of religiosity or marginalization. In other words, in countries where religion played a larger role in daily life or where there were higher levels of social inequality, the connection between authoritarian attitudes and threat perceptions was less pronounced. This suggests that broader cultural and social factors can indeed shape how individual attitudes translate into perceptions of threat.

“The question why the authoritarianism-threat link is stronger in some countries than in others requires further exploration,” Farkhari said.

The researchers also compared the results from the one-time survey responses to those from the daily diary entries. They found that right-wing authoritarianism was a stronger predictor of threat perceptions in the one-time surveys than in the daily reports. This indicates that while right-wing authoritarianism is linked to general perceptions of threat, it may be less predictive of day-to-day feelings of threat.

As with all research, there are caveats to consider. The study did not examine the specific situational factors that might trigger increases in threat perception. Future studies could use experience sampling methods to investigate whether real-world events, such as media coverage of immigration or political rhetoric, contribute to fluctuations in perceived threat.

“Our global study ran for a time frame of approximately 1 year, with individual participation taking place within a time span of a few weeks at some point during this year,” Farkhari said. “That is, different individuals participated in the study during different time periods. Consequently, the contexts in which the participants were embedded varied.”

“While the country-level indicators chosen for the present work are not subject to extreme short-term fluctuations (e.g. country-level religiosity does not increase or drop dramatically within months), it is known that perceived disruptions of order, for example, due to terrorist attacks, may activate right-wing authoritarianism and its downstream attitudinal consequences.”

Additionally, the samples were still predominantly from Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) countries, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Future research should aim to replicate these findings with larger and more diverse samples from a wider range of countries.

“This research is part of my PhD,” Farkhari said. “It is embedded within a series of other research questions related to correlates and consequences of right-wing authoritarian attitudes. In a previously published article (Farkhari et al., 2022), for instance, we investigated the relationship between right-wing authoritarianism and conspiracy mentality.”

The study, “Right-wing authoritarianism and perceptions that minoritized groups pose a threat: The moderating roles of individual- and country-level religiosity and marginalization,” was authored by Fahima Farkhari, Julian Scharbert, Lara Kroencke, Christin Schwarzer, Jonas F. Koch, Maarten H. W. van Zalk, Bernd Schlipphak, and Mitja D. Back.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Political ambivalence has a surprising relationship with support for violence
Authoritarianism

New study sheds light on the psychological roots of collective violence

June 21, 2025

A new study from Lebanon finds that people with authoritarian beliefs tend to oppose violence against political leaders, while those high in social dominance orientation are more likely to support violence against rival group members.

Read moreDetails
Epistemic mistrust and dogmatism predict preference for authoritarian-looking leaders
Authoritarianism

Epistemic mistrust and dogmatism predict preference for authoritarian-looking leaders

June 20, 2025

A new study suggests that the way people learn to trust others early in life can shape their political ideology and preference for strong, dominant leaders—though not directly, but through dogmatic thinking and broader political attitudes.

Read moreDetails
Fear predicts authoritarian attitudes across cultures, with conservatives most affected
Authoritarianism

Fear predicts authoritarian attitudes across cultures, with conservatives most affected

June 13, 2025

A sweeping study of over 84,000 people across 59 countries found that individuals who feel threatened by crime, poverty, or instability are more likely to support authoritarian governance—especially in Western nations and among politically right-leaning individuals.

Read moreDetails
Political ambivalence has a surprising relationship with support for violence
Authoritarianism

Perceived social breakdown fuels desire for authoritarian leaders, new psychology study shows

June 10, 2025

New research provides causal evidence that perceived societal breakdown—known as anomie—can increase support for authoritarianism by eroding feelings of control and increasing uncertainty.

Read moreDetails
Your brain’s insulation might become emergency energy during a marathon
Authoritarianism

Major study points to evolved psychology behind support for strongmen

June 5, 2025

A new cross-cultural study finds that people across 25 countries are more likely to support dominant, authoritarian leaders when facing intergroup conflict. The results suggest that humans may have evolved psychological instincts that favor forceful leadership during times of threat.

Read moreDetails
Donald Trump’s presidency associated with significant changes in the topography of prejudice in the United States
Authoritarianism

Authoritarian beliefs predict whether voters see Trump or Clinton as psychopathic

June 4, 2025

Researchers found that voters’ authoritarian tendencies influenced how they judged the psychopathic traits of 2016 presidential candidates. Those high in authoritarianism were more likely to view Trump favorably and Clinton as psychologically disordered—and vice versa.

Read moreDetails
Authoritarianism in parents may hinder a key cognitive skill in their children
Authoritarianism

Authoritarianism in parents may hinder a key cognitive skill in their children

June 2, 2025

A new study suggests that mothers who favor social hierarchies and obedience to authority use less perspective-taking language with their children—especially when discussing people from different ethnic backgrounds. Their children also show weaker ability to understand others’ thoughts and feelings.

Read moreDetails
A single Trump tweet has been connected to a rise in arrests of white Americans
Authoritarianism

New study helps explain rising Trump support among minority voters

May 29, 2025

The belief that only conservatives prefer authoritarian leaders is upended by new research showing ethnic minorities—regardless of political affiliation—are more supportive of strong leadership than White liberals. The study suggests generalized trust is a key psychological factor.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

The triglyceride-glucose index: Can it predict depression risk in the elderly?

People with ADHD exhibit altered brain activity before making high-stakes choices

Narcissistic individuals are more prone to maladaptive daydreaming

Effort or fate? Sexual mindsets predict whether bedroom bliss spills over into broader wellbeing

People who use AI may pay a social price, according to new psychology research

Researchers identify a shared brain pattern behind feeling surprised

New research shows the psychological toll of the 2024 presidential election

Methylphenidate: ADHD drug curbs impulsivity in men only, linked to brain wiring differences

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy