Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Relationships and Sexual Health

Romantic partners who get phubbed are more likely to spy on digital communications, study finds

by Eric W. Dolan
September 30, 2022
in Relationships and Sexual Health, Social Media
(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay on top of the latest psychology findings: Subscribe now!

New research provides evidence that people who have been “phubbed” by their romantic partner are more likely to snoop on their partner’s electronic communications. The findings have been published in Computers in Human Behavior.

Phubbing is the act of snubbing someone in favor of your phone. It’s a new phenomenon, made possible by the ever-present nature of mobile devices. And it’s becoming increasingly common, as more and more people find themselves tethered to their screens. Phubbing can involve ignoring someone who is trying to talk to you, or simply paying more attention to your phone than the person in front of you. Either way, it’s a form of rudeness that can have a real impact on relationships.

“Digital technology are constantly evolving, as are the opportunities and challenges they present for our intimate relationships,” said study author Janneke M. Schokkenbroek (@JMSchokkenbroek), a PhD candidate at Ghent University.

“With the easy accessibility of smartphones and other digital devices, we have the whole world in the palm of our hands, and more and more our lives are taking place online. However, none of us have received a manual on how to navigate all these in-person and online experiences and interactions and foster and maintain healthy relationships at the same time. That is the reason why I started researching the role of digital technology within intimate relationships, and the challenges it may present.”

The researchers asked 346 participants in romantic relationships to indicate how often their partner engaged in phubbing. They also asked the participants to indicate how often they engaged in partner surveillance behaviors, such as reading their partner’s instant messages or emails. They also completed assessments of perceived partner responsiveness and anxiety.

Phubbing was quite common. Approximately 93% of women and 89% of men reported being phubbed by their partner at least once during the past two weeks. Partner surveillance behaviors were less common. Approximately 38% of women and 21% of men admitted to having looked at their partner’s online behaviors at least once in the past two weeks. Surveillance behaviors were more common among participants who were younger, in shorter relationships, and female.

Importantly, Schokkenbroek and her colleagues found that the experience of being phubbed was associated with partner surveillance. Those who reported being phubbed by a romantic partner more frequently tended to surveil their partner’s electronic communications more frequently.

“The findings of our study illustrate that, for some people, the experience of being ignored by their partner because they are looking at their smartphone instead may illicit feelings of doubt about their partner’s commitment to them, which may induce feelings of stress and anxiety,” Schokkenbroek told PsyPost. “To cope with these feelings, some people will snoop into their partner’s online activities (this is also known as ‘electronic partner surveillance’) to gather information on what their partner is doing when they are so busy on their phones.”

“Almost everyone looks at their phone every now and then while they are interacting with their partner, but it is important to realize that this may have a negative impact on our partner and our relationship. We should be conscious of this and make sure our partner still feels validated and heard and does not interpret the phubbing behavior as a disinterest in them or the relationship. For example, it might be a good idea to explain to your partner why you are looking at your phone at that moment, or to include them in the activity.”

The findings held even after controlling for participant sex, age, and relationship length. But the researchers noted that only phubbing only accounted for about 5% of the variance in electronic partner surveillance.

“The model we tested only explained a very small part of the reasons why people engage in electronic partner surveillance,” Schokkenbroek explained. “This means that there are still a lot of other explanations out there as to why people snoop on their partner’s online activities and how their partner’s phubbing behavior plays a role in this.”

“Although our findings provide some very important insights into harmful technology use within our intimate relationships, it is important to realize that it is likely that these findings only apply to a small group of people,” the researcher added. “The extent to which the phubbing behavior is perceived as hurtful differs between people and can depend on the context as well. Not everyone finds it hurtful when their partner pays attention to their phone instead of them, and not everyone will feel the need to look into their partner’s activities because of this.”

“Also, the context in which the phubbing occurs might be important to consider: For example, for most people it is probably less of a problem when their partner is paying attention to their phone instead of them when they are both at home watching TV compared to when they are at a restaurant having dinner together.”

The study, “Phubbed and curious: The relation between partner phubbing and electronic partner surveillance“, was authored by Janneke M. Schokkenbroek, Wim Hardyns, and Koen Ponnet.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin2ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

New psychology study sheds light on mysterious “feelings of presence” during isolation
Attractiveness

What is the most attractive body fat percentage for men? New research offers an answer

July 1, 2025

What makes a man’s body attractive? A new international study explored this question using body scans and evolutionary models—testing which physical traits matter most. The results challenge some popular assumptions about leanness, muscle, and what people really prefer.

Read moreDetails
New research delves into the unexplored psychology of Femcels
Dating

Ghosting and ‘breadcrumbing’: the psychological impact of our bad behaviour on dating apps

June 30, 2025

Dating apps are less forest than a maze, where users encounter lying wolves, breadcrumb trails and sudden ghosting. Research reveals that deception, sporadic interest and abrupt disappearances are common, underscoring the need for honest communication and friendship before romance blooms.

Read moreDetails
Study explores psychological pathways from attachment style to love addiction
Addiction

Love addiction linked to memory and attention problems

June 30, 2025

Obsessive romantic attachment may be more than an emotional burden—it could also impair your thinking. A new study reveals that love addiction, especially when fueled by anxiety and social media use, is linked to memory problems and daily cognitive failures.

Read moreDetails
Scientists show how you’re unknowingly sealing yourself in an information bubble
Cognitive Science

Scientists show how you’re unknowingly sealing yourself in an information bubble

June 29, 2025

Scientists have found that belief polarization doesn’t always come from misinformation or social media bubbles. Instead, it often begins with a simple search. Our choice of words—and the algorithm’s response—can subtly seal us inside our own informational comfort zones.

Read moreDetails
Openness to sugar relationships tied to short-term mating, not life history strategy
Evolutionary Psychology

Openness to sugar relationships tied to short-term mating, not life history strategy

June 28, 2025

Sugar relationships may be more about sexual attitudes than survival strategies. A new study shows people drawn to these arrangements tend to favor short-term mating, while early-life unpredictability plays only a small role—especially for men.

Read moreDetails
Sexual satisfaction’s link to marital happiness grows stronger with age
Relationships and Sexual Health

Similarity in long‑term romantic couples probably matters less than we think

June 27, 2025

Despite common belief that couples must be alike, a review of 339 studies finds little evidence that actual similarity predicts lasting relationship satisfaction.

Read moreDetails
TikTok tics study sheds light on recovery trends and ongoing mental health challenges
Body Image and Body Dysmorphia

TikTok and similar platforms linked to body dissatisfaction and eating disorder symptoms

June 27, 2025

Frequent use of platforms like TikTok and YouTube Shorts is linked to disordered eating symptoms among teens, according to new research. The study found that body comparisons and dissatisfaction may help explain this troubling association—especially among girls.

Read moreDetails
Religious beliefs and premarital abstinence: New study explores intimacy dynamics among Christian couples
Attachment Styles

Attachment anxiety might explain how early trauma shapes emotions during sexual disagreements

June 27, 2025

Individuals with greater childhood trauma experienced and expressed fewer positive emotions—and more negative ones—during sexual disagreements. The link was largely explained by attachment anxiety, a fear-based relationship pattern formed early in life

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Peppermint tea boosts memory and attention—but why?

Psychedelic compound blurs boundary between self and others in the brain, study finds

Could creatine slow cognitive decline? Mouse study reveals promising effects on brain aging

ChatGPT and “cognitive debt”: New study suggests AI might be hurting your brain’s ability to think

Frequent dreams and nightmares surged worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic

Vagus nerve signals influence food intake more in higher socio-economic groups

People who think “everyone agrees with me” are more likely to support populism

What is the most attractive body fat percentage for men? New research offers an answer

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy