Almost one-third of surveyed college students report engaging in sexual activity while riding in or driving a moving vehicle. Couples often view this behavior as a fun adventure despite the obvious risks on the road. The practice involves high rates of distracted driving and a noticeable gender gap in the rates of orgasm, according to new research published in The Journal of Sex Research.
For about a century, automobiles have provided couples with a private place away from family and roommates to explore their sexuality. Most academic literature on the subject has focused on the well-known practice of parking. This concept refers to having sex in a stationary car parked in a secluded area, like an empty field or a drive-in theater.
Fewer researchers have evaluated the prevalence of sexual interactions while a vehicle is actually traveling down the road. Some media reports and traffic safety records capture extreme examples of this behavior. These official records usually only emerge when the sexual activity leads to a traffic stop, aggressive driving complaints, or a vehicle crash.
Researchers occasionally scan adult websites to analyze sexually explicit videos of people acting intimately while driving. Yet these instances and official traffic records represent only a fraction of the actual occurrences happening in everyday life.
Cindy Struckman-Johnson, a psychology researcher at the University of South Dakota, wanted to better estimate how common this hidden behavior is. Along with public health researcher Peter Anderson of Walden University and George Smeaton of Smeaton Research Consulting, Struckman-Johnson sought to profile the people engaging in this activity.
Over ten years ago, Struckman-Johnson published an initial survey on the topic that focused strictly on the sexual experiences of people in the driver’s seat. For this updated effort, the research team gathered data from both drivers and passengers. By expanding the focus, they hoped to understand how sexual partners interact as a couple in the front seat, what motivates them, and how their cell phone habits factor into the equation.
The researchers recruited just under one thousand undergraduate students from a Midwestern university to complete an anonymous online survey. Survey participants included students enrolled in variety of psychology classes covering topics like human development, abnormal behavior, and human sexuality. The participant pool was primarily white and heterosexual, and the average age was about twenty-one years old.
The students answered a series of targeted questions about their experiences with sex in vehicles. Because the study relies on self-reported survey data, the researchers can document correlations rather than direct cause and effect. Participants who indicated they had engaged in sexual activity as either a driver or a passenger answered specific questions about their most recent incident.
The survey prompted the students to describe the type of road, the sexual acts performed, and the identity of their partner. Respondents also had the opportunity to type freely about their most memorable experiences, allowing the researchers to capture nuanced details about the encounters.
The results showed that twenty-nine percent of the surveyed students had engaged in sexual activity in a moving vehicle. This behavior usually took place with a serious romantic partner on a rural highway or country road. Penetrative sex was relatively rare, with vaginally penetrative sex reported by just nine percent of the final analytical group. Very few people reported anal sex.
The most common sexual acts reported were oral sex and genital touching. More than two-thirds of the study participants who had sex in a moving vehicle said they engaged in oral sex. Many of these respondents described the situation as a form of erotic foreplay that occurred while they were trying to quickly get to a final destination.
The survey revealed a massive gap in physical pleasure between men and women. When prompted to recall if they achieved an orgasm during their most recent experience in a moving vehicle, roughly two-thirds of men said yes. In contrast, only about one-fifth of the women said they experienced an orgasm.
The researchers suspect this gap might relate to social expectations defining how heterosexual couples operate. Often referred to as sexual scripts, these social norms dictate patterned behaviors and sometimes prioritize male physical pleasure over female pleasure. In the survey responses, women were more likely than men to say they engaged in the activity specifically to satisfy their partner’s arousal or to give their partner an exciting adventure.
Conversely, the researchers noted that the anatomy of the situation itself might explain the differing orgasm rates. Providing oral sex to a male driver wedged behind the steering wheel is generally easier than attempting to do the same for a female driver. Because the survey did not ask whether participants were giving or receiving oral sex, the biological mechanics of the acts remain a possible factor.
The team also found that the participants took high levels of risk regarding sexual health. Among those reporting oral or penetrative sex, only about ten percent indicated they used a condom. The impromptu and spontaneous nature of these sexual encounters likely prevents couples from using proper physical barriers. Some survey respondents mentioned that a lack of condoms caused distracting bodily messes on the upholstery of the car.
Another layer of risk came from modern technology. Nearly forty percent of the participants reported using a cell phone while having sex in a moving vehicle. Almost thirty percent of that group said they watched pornography on their phones during the act.
Other cell phone habits during the journey showed distinct divisions between men and women. The women in the study were more likely to text or call a friend while the sexual activity was happening. The researchers noted that these participants might have been including friends as a way to “show off” to their peers or to increase their own levels of sexual excitement by being somewhat public.
Risky driving was exceptionally common during these events. Three-quarters of the participants reported experiencing at least one type of negative driver safety consequence. Over half of the respondents admitted the driver took their eyes off the road for more than two seconds.
Almost one-quarter of the participants said their vehicle drifted into another lane. One in five indicated the vehicle exceeded the speed limit. Safety margins practically dissolved as some participants even noted the driver completely let go of the steering wheel.
Despite the high frequency of distracted driving, only two participants reported a minor vehicle crash. Many participants said they mitigated the danger by slowing their speed, turning on cruise control, or pulling onto the shoulder of the highway to finish their sexual activities.
Although less than half of the respondents reported personal negative outcomes, a small number indicated they experienced the worst sex of their lives. A fractional percentage of respondents reported being pressured into the acts. Some women reported being emotionally manipulated or physically coerced into performing oral sex on abusive partners who were driving.
Yet for the vast majority, the outcomes felt entirely positive. Over eighty percent of the respondents said they had a fun and exciting adventure. Roughly ten percent of the participants labeled it as the best sex they ever had. Some participants linked the event to deeper romantic milestones, reporting it made them feel closer to a partner they eventually married.
The researchers caution that the results draw exclusively on students attending a single university in the rural Midwest. These students navigate long stretches of undeveloped plains, which might influence their sexual behavior differently than young adults living in dense urban settings. A person living in a crowded, high-traffic city may have far fewer opportunities to try this behavior.
Future work in this area will need to include older adults. Some public polls suggest adults in their thirties and forties have high rates of sexual experiences in moving vehicles. Researchers should also survey a more balanced count of men and women. The current study attracted substantially more female participants than male participants, which might skew some of the broader behavioral trends.
Clarifying the simple mechanics of these sexual acts will also help explain the orgasm gap. Future studies that document which partner is actively receiving physical stimulation could resolve whether the gap stems from social expectations or spatial restrictions.
As self-driving technology advances, the landscape of vehicular intimacy will likely shift entirely. The researchers point out that autonomous vehicles could turn cars into mobile bedrooms, making automotive sex increasingly commonplace.
For now, the research team recommends that basic driver safety programs begin mentioning the danger of sexual distractions. They also suggest that teenage sex education courses should acknowledge the reality of this behavior instead of intentionally ignoring it. A realistic education program could encourage young adults to simply pull off the roadway to prioritize both sexual safety and traffic survival.
The study, “A New Look at Sexual Behavior in Moving Vehicles Reported by Midwestern College Students,” was authored by Cindy Struckman-Johnson, Peter Anderson, and George Smeaton.
