Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

New psychology research indicates that bullshitting is sign of intelligence

by Eric W. Dolan
June 25, 2021
in Cognitive Science
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Follow PsyPost on Google News

Bullshitting can be an indication of cognitive ability, according to new research published in the scientific journal Evolutionary Psychology. The study found that people who are better at producing made-up explanations for various concepts tend to be more intelligent compared to those who struggle to produce convincing bullshit. But skilled bullshitters are not necessarily frequent bullshitters.

Researchers have found that receptivity to pseudo-profound bullshit is associated with several cognitive factors, such as lower levels of cognitive reflection and higher levels of ontological confusion. Pseudo-profound bullshit refers to computer-generated statements that seem profound but actually have no real meaning, such as the sentence “We are in the midst of a high-frequency blossoming of interconnectedness that will give us access to the quantum soup itself.”

But little attention has been paid to people’s ability to produce their own bullshit statements.

“I first got involved in pseudo-profound bullshit research as an undergraduate research assistant. My task was to gather captions describing various artworks. These were used as stimuli for Study 4 of ‘Bullshit Makes the Art Grow Profounder,'” explained study author Mane Kara-Yakoubian (@ManeYakoubian), a graduate student at Ryerson University.

“We found that people couldn’t differentiate artspeak (i.e., the language artists and art scholars use to discuss art) from pseudo-profound bullshit. I thought this was amusing, as I was doing a minor in Fine Arts at the time, predominantly taking art history courses. The more I bullshitted an essay, the better my grade was. Naturally, the research grew on me; I could see its relevance in my life. So when the opportunity to conduct more research in this area presented itself, I was quite eager to pursue it alongside my graduate mentors.”

The researchers recruited 1,017 participants for two studies examining cognitive ability, the willingness to bullshit, and bullshitting ability.

To measure the willingness to bullshit, the participants were shown ten concepts and asked to rate their knowledge of each concept on a 5-point scale ranging from “never heard of it” to “know it well, understand the concept.” Six of the concepts — such as “Sexual Selection Theory” and “General Relativity” — were real. But the four other concepts — “Subjunctive Scaling,” “Declarative Fraction,” “Genetic Autonomy,” and “Neural Acceptance” — were fake.

Those who claimed to be knowledgeable about the fake concepts were considered as having a greater willingness to bullshit.

To measure the ability to bullshit, a subset of the participants were asked to read the list of concepts again, and “produce the most convincing and satisfying explanation that you can for each term.” If a participant was not familiar with the concept, they were urged to “be creative and make up an explanation that you think others will find convincing and satisfying” and “not worry about the truth of your claims.”

Another sample of participants then rated how accurate and satisfactory they believed the explanations were on a 5-point scale. In the second study, the participants also rated the intelligence of the person who created the explanations.

The researchers found that participants who were better able to generate seemingly satisfying and accurate explanations of fake concepts tended to also score higher on a vocabulary test as well as a measure of abstract reasoning and non-verbal fluid intelligence.

“A person’s bullshitting ability is positively associated with how smart they seem and how smart they genuinely are. We propose that bullshitting may have emerged as an energetically inexpensive strategy of obtaining prestige, status, or goods in domains where success is determined by the subjective evaluation of others (such as the fine arts, politics, public speaking, etc.) A person can go through the process of acquiring the necessary skills to succeed in a particular domain, or they can bullshit their way through it, and be rewarded similarly,” Kara-Yakoubian told PsyPost.

But one’s willingness to bullshit was not associated with their bullshitting ability. In fact, those who scored higher on the measures of intelligence tended to be less willing to bullshit.

“We found that bullshitting ability and bullshitting willingness were independent of each other. Smarter individuals were less willing to engage in bullshitting despite their superior skills. This might be explained by their greater capacity to attribute mental states to others (i.e., theory of mind), enabling them to be more cognizant of when bullshitting will work and when it won’t,” Kara-Yakoubian explained.

“Future research might explore the relationship between bullshitting, mentalizing, and theory of mind, as well as personality factors that may predict bullshitting willingness.”

Kara-Yakoubian and her colleagues also found that people who were more willing to bullshit tended to also be more receptive to pseudo-profound bullshit. The findings are in line with another study, published in the British Journal of Social Psychology, which found that people who engaged in more frequent bullshitting tended to be mores susceptible to falling for various types of misleading information, such as pseudo-profound bullshit and fake news headlines.

“It probably seems intuitive to believe that you can’t bullshit a bullshitter, but our research suggests that this isn’t actually the case,” explained Shane Littrell, the lead author of that study, in a news release. “In fact, it appears that the biggest purveyors of persuasive bullshit are ironically some of the ones most likely to fall for it.”

The study, “Bullshit Ability as an Honest Signal of Intelligence“, was authored by Martin Harry Turpin, Mane Kara-Yakoubian, Alexander C. Walker, Heather E. K. Walker, Jonathan A. Fugelsang, and Jennifer A. Stolz.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin6ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Even in healthy adults, high blood sugar levels are linked to impaired brain function
Memory

Neuroscientists decode how people juggle multiple items in working memory

July 8, 2025

New neuroscience research shows how the brain decides which memories deserve more attention. By tracking brain activity, scientists found that the frontal cortex helps direct limited memory resources, allowing people to remember high-priority information more precisely than less relevant details.

Read moreDetails
New study uncovers a surprising effect of cold-water immersion
Cognitive Science

New study uncovers a surprising effect of cold-water immersion

July 8, 2025

Cold-water immersion increases energy expenditure—but it may also drive people to eat more afterward. A study in Physiology & Behavior found participants consumed significantly more food following cold exposure, possibly due to internal cooling effects that continue after leaving the water.

Read moreDetails
Positive attitudes toward AI linked to more prone to problematic social media use
Cognitive Science

People with higher cognitive ability have weaker moral foundations, new study finds

July 7, 2025

A large study has found that individuals with greater cognitive ability are less likely to endorse moral values such as compassion, fairness, loyalty, and purity. The results point to a consistent negative relationship between intelligence and moral intuitions.

Read moreDetails
These common sounds can impair your learning, according to new psychology research
Cognitive Science

These common sounds can impair your learning, according to new psychology research

July 4, 2025

Your brain’s ancient defense system might be sabotaging your test scores. New research suggests our "behavioral immune system," which makes us subconsciously alert to signs of illness, can be triggered by coughs and sniffles.

Read moreDetails
From fireflies to brain cells: Unraveling the complex web of synchrony in networks
Addiction

Understanding “neuronal ensembles” could revolutionize addiction treatment

July 3, 2025

The same brain system that rewards you for a delicious meal is hijacked by drugs like fentanyl. A behavioral neuroscientist explains how understanding the specific memories behind these rewards is the key to treating addiction without harming our essential survival instincts.

Read moreDetails
Scientists just uncovered a surprising illusion in how we remember time
Memory

Scientists just uncovered a surprising illusion in how we remember time

July 3, 2025

Our perception of time is more fragile than we think. Scientists have uncovered a powerful illusion where repeated exposure to information makes us misremember it as happening much further in the past, significantly distorting our mental timelines.

Read moreDetails
Peppermint tea boosts memory and attention—but why?
Cognitive Science

Peppermint tea boosts memory and attention—but why?

July 2, 2025

Can a cup of peppermint tea sharpen your mind? A new study suggests it can—but not in the way scientists expected. Improved memory and attention followed the tea, but increased brain blood flow wasn't the reason why.

Read moreDetails
Scientists reveal ChatGPT’s left-wing bias — and how to “jailbreak” it
Artificial Intelligence

ChatGPT and “cognitive debt”: New study suggests AI might be hurting your brain’s ability to think

July 1, 2025

Researchers at MIT investigated how writing with ChatGPT affects brain activity and recall. Their findings indicate that reliance on AI may lead to reduced mental engagement, prompting concerns about cognitive “offloading” and its implications for education.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Neuroscientists decode how people juggle multiple items in working memory

Inside the bored brain: Unlocking the power of the default mode network

Choline imbalance in the brain linked to with cognitive symptoms in young depression patients

Scientists who relocate more often start Nobel research up to two years earlier

Sedentary time linked to faster brain aging in older adults, study finds

People with short-video addiction show altered brain responses during decision-making

New study uncovers a surprising effect of cold-water immersion

Being adopted doesn’t change how teens handle love and dating

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy