PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive COVID-19

Americans who used Trump briefings to get COVID-19 information were less willing to wear a mask and socially distance, study finds

by Eric W. Dolan
July 26, 2021
Reading Time: 3 mins read
(Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)

(Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

New research has found that watching Donald Trump’s White House briefings was associated with reduced intentions to follow public health guidelines intended stop the spread of COVID-19 in 2020. The study, published in the journal Health Communication, indicates that the type of media that people consume during the pandemic is related to their beliefs about COVID-19.

“This study was designed at the early stage of COVID-19 when the world witnessed massive infodemic and politicization of public health issues,” said study author Myojung Chung, an assistant professor of journalism and media advocacy at Northeastern University.

“In particular, even official sources were not always trustworthy, occasionally spreading ungrounded information. The situation made us curious how health information from different media outlets or sources leads to different health perceptions and behaviors.”

Between June 3 and June 7, 2020, Chung and her colleague surveyed 1,106 U.S. residents regarding their use of various media sources and their coronavirus-related attitudes and intentions.

The researchers provided the participants with a list of liberal and conservative new sources – such as BuzzFeed and The Daily Caller, among others – and asked them to indicate which ones they frequently used to obtain information about the novel coronavirus. The participants also indicated how often they used Trump’s briefings, health organizations’ (e.g., CDC, WHO) briefings, social media (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube), and national TV, radio and/or newspapers to get information about COVID-19.

“This study found that depending on the main information source during the COVID-19 pandemic, people differently perceive the risk and show different levels of intentions to adopt risk preventive behaviors. Such results suggest that in times when there can be abundant false and misleading information, the importance of accurate, fair, and balanced risk information comes to the fore. Also, this study informs average news consumers of the necessity of balanced media use during public health crises like COVID-19.”

Those who frequently consumed conservative media and used Trump’s briefings to obtain information were less likely to view coronavirus as a severe health problem, less likely to view public health advice as effective, and less likely to view public health advice as easy to follow. This, in turn, was associated with reduced intentions to wear a mask in public, frequently wash hands, maintain social distance from others, and stay home if feeling unwell.

“This study was conducted when Donald Trump from the Republican Party was the U.S. president. We are curious how the results would be if this study was conducted in the current administration with a Democratic president,” Chung said.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

Those who got their COVID-19 information from liberal media, health organizations’ briefings and traditional media were more likely to view coronavirus as a severe health problem and more likely to view public health advice as easy to follow. This, in turn, was associated with increased intentions to adopt risk preventative behaviors.

Participants who used liberal and traditional media also viewed themselves as being at greater risk of being infected by the deadly virus, while those who used social media to get information about COVID-19 perceived themselves as being less at risk.

The researchers controlled for potentially cofounding variables such as age, gender, race, education, household income, experience with COVID-19, and political views. But the study — like all research — includes some limitations.

“This study examined respondents’ intentions to follow public health recommendations to prevent COVID-19 infection, but not their actual behaviors. Future research that examines actual behaviors would provide a more complete understanding of the role of different media use,” Chung explained.

“Because we used cross-sectional data, it is difficult to assure any causal inferences in this study. Future studies that employ experiments or longitudinal intervention would help to better our understanding of communication during the COVID-19 pandemic.”

The study, “Red Media, Blue Media, Trump Briefings, and COVID-19: Examining How Information Sources Predict Risk Preventive Behaviors via Threat and Efficacy,” was authored by Myojung Chung and S. Mo Jones-Jang.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin1ShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • A popular workout supplement might protect the brain from gut inflammation
  • When women share a husband, physical fights between co-wives are common across cultures
  • Screen time not consistently tied to children’s emotional or behavioral problems in a large Scottish study
  • Emotional blunting is common in depression and bipolar disorder, even after symptoms ease
  • How your personality “acts as an invisible architect for your career,” according to new research

Science of Money

  • Spending crypto triggers more guilt than spending cash, study finds
  • How giving AI a personality changes the way consumers buy
  • How short expert recommendation lists change online shopping behavior
  • Why saying “I like it” is more persuasive than “you will like it,” according to psychology
  • When wives earn more, do husbands do more chores?

Recent

  • Machine learning uncovers early warning signs of depression in brain scans
  • Social freedom shapes whose version of reality you adopt, new research suggests
  • Puberty may mark a turning point for sex differences in the brain’s emotion and memory centers
  • Psychologists identify three distinct profiles of support for free speech
  • Psilocybin appears to strengthen this optical illusion, but LSD microdoses do not
  • Neighborhood air pollution linked to slower brain development in early adolescence
  • Psilocybin, LSD, and 2C-B leave different fingerprints on the brain, new study suggests
  • Listening to digital jazz might help people manage stress and regulate emotions
  • Happiness, not awe, may be the better emotional lever for openness to diversity
  • High smartphone dependency linked to altered time allocation in teens

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc