Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Business

People are less tolerant of atheists expressing their beliefs at work compared to Christians, Muslims, or Jews

by Beth Ellwood
August 2, 2021
in Business, Psychology of Religion

[Subscribe to PsyPost on YouTube to stay up-to-date on the latest developments in psychology and neuroscience]

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

According to a study published in the journal Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, people discriminate against atheists when it comes to the expression of beliefs in the workplace. Across three studies, people were consistently less likely to say they would allow an atheist — compared to a Christian, Muslim, or Jew — to sport a symbol of their beliefs in the workplace. The researchers further found that this effect was motivated by the assumption that the atheist employees were trying to impose their beliefs on others.

The study’s authors Kimberly Rios and her team describe atheists as “one of the most disliked groups in the United States.” This contempt for atheists includes stereotypes that atheists are immoral and untrustworthy which leads them to be discriminated against in contexts like politics and on the job market. There is some evidence to suggest that atheists are even more stigmatized in the U.S. than religious minorities like Muslims and Jews.

“We were interested in whether and why atheists’ requests would be accommodated less frequently in the workplace than those of other (religious) groups for a few reasons. First, although a small number of studies have suggested that atheists are less likely than religious individuals to be hired for certain types of jobs, no research to date had examined how atheists (relative to religious individuals) are perceived in the workplace – that is, after they are hired,” explained Rios, an associate professor of psychology at Ohio University.

“Most notably, however, we wanted to compare people’s responses to atheists and to particular religious groups. Prior work has looked at perceptions of atheists versus religious individuals in general, without specifying the religion. In the United States, where Christianity is both the dominant and majority religion, people may tend to think ‘Christian’ when hearing the term ‘religious.’ But are they less likely to accommodate atheist employees’ workplace requests than not only those of Christian and Jewish employees, but also those of Muslim employees?”

“That is a particularly interesting question because both atheists and Muslims are among the most negatively stereotyped groups in American society,” Rios said. “For example, public opinion polls show that many Americans are unlikely to vote for an atheist or Muslim political candidate, nor do they want their children to marry atheists or Muslims. In everyday workplace situations, though, is one of these groups met with more backlash, and if so, why?”

Rios and her colleagues conducted three studies where respondents read vignettes describing either an atheist, Christian, Jewish, or Muslim employee who wanted to display a symbol of their beliefs in the workplace (e.g., a belief quote inside their cubicle). After reading these scenarios, the participants were asked to rate how willing they would be to accommodate the employee’s request to express their beliefs at work.

“We looked at belief-related requests (instead of, say, willingness to give employees a raise or promotion) because we thought such requests would be less susceptible to social desirability concerns,” Rios said. “That is, an employer could explain away their reluctance to accommodate the expression of certain beliefs (or lack of beliefs) on the grounds that such beliefs should simply be kept out of the workplace… whereas it’s difficult to justify promoting or giving a raise to a member of one group over another, without seeming biased against the latter group.”

In the first study, the researchers found that respondents were less likely to accommodate an atheist (compared to a Christian, Jew, or Muslim) in expressing their beliefs inside their office cubicle or on their clothing (i.e., by wearing a pin).

A second study replicated the above effect and further found evidence for why people tend to discriminate in this way. Participants were more likely to feel that the atheist (compared to the religious employees) was displaying their beliefs in order to push their views on others — suggesting that the atheists posed a greater symbolic threat compared to the Christians, Jews, or Muslims. Moreover, symbolic threat mediated the relationship between the target’s religiosity and participants’ willingness to accommodate them in displaying a belief quote or wearing a symbolic pin.

In a third study, the participants were again less accepting of an employee wearing a belief pin when he/she was an atheist compared to a religious person. And again, this effect was partly explained by the belief that the atheist employee was pushing his/her views onto others. In addition, the effect was also explained (but to a lesser extent) by the belief that the atheist was posing a threat to others’ well-being or access to resources — what the researchers termed a “realistic threat.” An example of a realistic threat was believing an employee wearing a belief pin would cause a restaurant to lose its customers.

“Participants perceived the atheist employees, more so than the Christian, Muslim, and Jewish employees, as wanting to impose their beliefs onto the workplace – in other words, as a ‘symbolic threat’ to workplace values. To a lesser extent, participants also saw the atheist employees as a ‘realistic threat’ to the workplace (i.e., as jeopardizing the company’s economic status and/or the employees’ general well-being). Both these types of threat helped explain people’s reticence to accommodate the atheist employees’ requests,” Rios told PsyPost.

Across all three studies, atheists were given a harder time for expressing their beliefs than Christians, Jews, or Muslims were. According to the study authors, this is in line with the perception that atheists represent an outgroup, while religious groups with similar Abrahamic roots are seen as belonging to the ingroup of religious people. When analyzing the three studies together, the researchers found that religious people were the least willing to accommodate atheists’ requests to express their beliefs. It is likely that for religious respondents, the Christians, Jews, and Muslims were seen as part of the ingroup, while atheists were not.

“This likely has to do with the fact that Christian, Jewish, and Muslim individuals all fall under the broader umbrella of ‘religious,’ whereas atheists are a separate category altogether. Indeed, a combined analysis across all our studies showed that participants who self-identified as religious were especially unwilling to accommodate atheists relative to other groups,” Rios explained.

Rios and her team say that a helpful approach to reducing these anti-atheist attitudes might be to emphasize the value of respecting others’ beliefs in the workplace — religious or otherwise. They also suggest that explaining that diversity is beneficial to the success of a workplace might help eliminate the perception that atheists are a threat to the well-being of the company. The authors note that their study was limited since the participants were not real supervisors and were only reading vignettes. They propose that future studies should examine these effects among real employers to strengthen their findings.

“Now that American society is becoming more secular (with church attendance recently falling below 50% for the first time), it will be critical to determine whether and to what extent our results hold up over time,” Rios said.

The study, “Explaining Anti-Atheist Discrimination in the Workplace: The Role of Intergroup Threat”, was authored by Kimberly Rios, Leah R. Halper, and Christopher P. Scheitle.

ShareTweetSendScanShareSharePin6Send

STAY CONNECTED

TRENDING

People are less satisfied with their marriage when their partner is not interested in social interactions, study finds

Toxoplasma gondii parasite infection linked to cognitive deterioration in schizophrenia

Narcissism and mental health in relationships: Surprising results revealed in new psychology study

Sleep effort mediates the relationship between anxiety and depression, study finds

New research shows link between tropical vacations and improved mental health

Pro-female and anti-male biases are more influential than race and other factors in Implicit Association Tests

RECENT

Linguistic analysis of 177,296 Reddit comments sheds light on negative attitudes toward science

Are you a frequent apologizer? New research indicates you might actually reap downstream benefits

Pro-female and anti-male biases are more influential than race and other factors in Implicit Association Tests

Toxoplasma gondii parasite infection linked to cognitive deterioration in schizophrenia

New research shows link between tropical vacations and improved mental health

Narcissism and mental health in relationships: Surprising results revealed in new psychology study

Sleep effort mediates the relationship between anxiety and depression, study finds

Masks hinder our ability to recognize facial expressions of sadness and fear

Currently Playing

Are you a frequent apologizer? New research indicates you might actually reap downstream benefits

Are you a frequent apologizer? New research indicates you might actually reap downstream benefits

Are you a frequent apologizer? New research indicates you might actually reap downstream benefits

Social Psychology
People with dark personality traits are better at finding novel ways to cause damage or harm others

People with dark personality traits are better at finding novel ways to cause damage or harm others

Dark Triad
Exercising in nature produces psychological benefits and measurable changes in brain activity

Exercising in nature produces psychological benefits and measurable changes in brain activity

Cognitive Science
People with social anxiety tend to engage in restrictive “safety behaviors” that make them less likable, study finds

People with social anxiety tend to engage in restrictive “safety behaviors” that make them less likable, study finds

Anxiety
Study helps untangle the complicated relationship between psychopathy and emotional awareness

Study helps untangle the complicated relationship between psychopathy and emotional awareness

Psychopathy
People exposed to phubbing by their romantic partner are less satisfied with their romantic relationship

People exposed to phubbing by their romantic partner are less satisfied with their romantic relationship

Relationships and Sexual Health
  • Cognitive Science
  • COVID-19
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Drug Research
  • Conspiracy Theories
  • Meditation
  • Psychology of Religion
  • Aviation Psychology and Human Factors
  • Relationships and Sexual Health
  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Neuroimaging
  • Psychedelic Drugs
  • Dark Triad
  • Political Psychology

About

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used.