Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Relationships and Sexual Health

“Phone snubbing” your partner can lead to a vicious cycle of resentment and retaliation, study suggests

by Emily Manis
October 7, 2022
in Relationships and Sexual Health, Social Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Smartphones have become an integral part of daily life. They are often thought of as a positive tool used to increase communication, but they can also be detrimental to relationships by drawing attention away from one’s partner. A study published in Computers in Human Behavior explores how “phubbing,” or phone snubbing, can negatively impact relationship satisfaction, and cause the partner who feels snubbed to retaliate.

The rise of technology has brought many significant challenges along with its plethora of advancements. Communication has been streamlined but also depersonalized by the popularity of smartphones and social media apps. This can harm in-person communication, especially when one person is perceiving that their partner is ignoring them for or being distracted by their cellphone while they are together.

This phenomenon is called “phubbing” and has been shown to be linked to negative relationship and personal outcomes. The new study sought to better understand the effect phubbing has on the partner who feels they are being phubbed, as well as how the phubbed partner responds behaviorally.

In their study, Tessa Thejas Thomas and colleagues utilized a sample of 75 participants recruited through social media and word of mouth to serve as their sample. All participants were required to be in a romantic relationship of 6 months or longer and living with their significant other. The sample was predominantly female and heterosexual.

All participants were asked to complete ten daily diaries, with measures including demographics, daily perceived phubbing, daily relationship satisfaction, daily self-esteem, daily depressed/anxious mood, daily anger/frustration, daily responses to being phubbed, and daily motivations for retaliation.

Results showed that partners who felt they were being phubbed in their relationships had lower levels of wellbeing, were less satisfied with their relationship, and reported more feelings of anger, jealousy, and frustration. Despite this, feeling phubbed by a partner did not lead to lower self-esteems or higher rates of anxiety and depression, with the exception of phubbing being correlated with depression in couples who have been married over 7 years.

Results also showed that phubbing was related to curiosity and resentment in the partner who felt ignored. When participants felt phubbed, they were more likely to pick up their own phones to engage in retaliatory behavior. This was motivated most strongly by boredom, rather than revenge, although there was no significant relationship.

“Although there may be various motivators for retaliatory phubbing, findings suggest partner phubbing operates as a vicious cycle,” the researchers wrote. “This may explain why, over time, phubbing is associated with several negative outcomes (i.e., relationship dissatisfaction, increased anger, resentment and tit-for-tat retaliation).”

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

“It is important to note, however, that several outcomes of perceived partner phubbing were not detrimental to the phubbee. There was no significant effect on phubbees’ personal well-being. Similarly, some individuals responded to partner phubbing by simply asking their partner what they were looking at. By doing so, they may have mitigated any conflict from occurring.”

This study made significant progress with better understanding the relatively new concept of phubbing as its relational effects. Despite this, there are limitations to note. One such limitation is that all measures were self-report, which can cause bias in answers and does not allow us to extrapolate causation from results. Additionally, only the partner feeling phubbed in the relationship answered questions; future research could focus on the perceptions and effects on both partners.

The study, “Phubbing in romantic relationships and retaliation: A daily diary study“, was authored by Tessa Thejas Thomas, Katherine B. Carnelley, and Claire M. Hart.

Previous Post

Machiavellianism is associated with bullshitting, according to new psychology research

Next Post

A new study has found vegetarians are more likely to be depressed than meat-eaters

RELATED

Scientists use “dream engineering” to boost creative problem-solving during REM sleep
Psychopathy

People with psychopathic traits don’t lack fear—they actually enjoy it

March 10, 2026
Scientists identify a fat-derived hormone that drives the mood benefits of exercise
Artificial Intelligence

Therapists test an AI dating simulator to help chronically single men practice romantic skills

March 9, 2026
New psychology research sheds light on the mystery of deja vu
Political Psychology

Black Lives Matter protests sparked a short-term conservative backlash but ultimately shifted the 2020 election towards Democrats

March 9, 2026
Neuroscientists have pinpointed a potential biological signature for psychopathy
Neuroimaging

Neuroscientists have pinpointed a potential biological signature for psychopathy

March 9, 2026
Democrats dislike Republicans more than Republicans dislike Democrats, studies find
Personality Psychology

Supportive relationships are linked to positive personality changes

March 8, 2026
New psychology research shows that hatred is not just intense anger
Social Psychology

New research sheds light on the psychological recipe for a grudge

March 8, 2026
What is virtue signaling? The science behind moral grandstanding
Definitions

What is virtue signaling? The science behind moral grandstanding

March 8, 2026
A psychological need for certainty is associated with radical right voting
Social Psychology

Apocalyptic views are surprisingly common among Americans and predict responses to existential hazards

March 7, 2026

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Finger length ratios offer clues to how the womb shapes sexual orientation

Study links parents’ perceived financial strain to delayed brain development in infants

Genetic factors drive the link between cognitive ability and socioeconomic status

How viral infections disrupt memory and thinking skills

Everyday mental quirks like déjà vu might be natural byproducts of a resting mind

New analysis shows ideology, not science, drove the global prohibition of psychedelics

People with psychopathic traits don’t lack fear—they actually enjoy it

Scientists use “dream engineering” to boost creative problem-solving during REM sleep

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc