Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Evolutionary Psychology

Testosterone levels help explain why women tend to experience lower sexual desire for their partners

by Beth Ellwood
November 19, 2022
in Evolutionary Psychology, Relationships and Sexual Health, Social Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Men tend to report greater sexual desire for their partners than women do, and findings published in the journal Biological Psychology suggest that this sex difference is at least partly explained by biology. In a diary study of newlywed couples, women reported lower dyadic sexual desire compared to their partners, and lower levels of testosterone explained this sex difference.

Sexual desire for one’s partner — also called dyadic sexual desire — plays an important role in healthy long-term relationships. Yet many couples experience a mismatch in sexual desire. This is particularly common among mixed-sex couples since men tend to report higher dyadic sexual desire, and higher sexual desire in general, compared to women.

Discrepancies in sexual desire can contribute to relationship issues. For example, one study found that women’s lower sexual desire predicted lower marital satisfaction for both members of the couple. And yet a clear explanation for this sex difference has not been established.

“Within mixed-sex couples, men tend to have higher sexual desire for their partners than women do. Because there are many potential factors that could contribute to this sex difference — ranging from hormonal differences between men and women to stress or even sex roles that reflect gendered social norms — I was interested in testing the roles of these various factors to help advance and clarify our theoretical understanding of differences between men’s versus women’s sexual desire for each other,” explained study author Juliana E. French, an assistant professor of psychology at Oklahoma State University and core faculty in the Oklahoma Center for Evolutionary ANalysis (OCEAN).

French and her colleagues conducted a study to explore sex differences in dyadic desire among mixed-sex newlywed couples. They further sought to test the influence of biological, relational, cognitive, and emotional factors in explaining these differences.

The researchers examined existing data from a study of newlywed couples recruited from Northern Florida. The final sample consisted of 98 participants — 48 husbands and 50 wives. Husbands were an average of 32 years old, and wives were an average age of 30. At the start of the study, both members of the couple completed a survey that assessed cognitions tapping into their identification with masculine and feminine sex roles and attended a lab session where they provided saliva samples to be tested for testosterone.

The couples were then instructed to complete a daily survey before bedtime for 14 days, independently from their partners. These surveys assessed their daily sexual desire for their spouse, marital satisfaction, marital commitment, stress, self-esteem, and mood.

The results revealed that, over the 14-day study period, husbands reported significantly higher daily sexual desire for their wives than their wives did. Mediation analysis further revealed that this sex difference was at least partly explained by higher levels of circulating testosterone among men compared to their partners.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

“We simultaneously examined the roles of biological, relationship, cognitive, and emotional experiences for explaining the sex difference in sexual desire for one’s partner, and differences in husbands’ versus wives’ testosterone levels emerged as the only factor that helped to account for husbands’ relatively higher sexual desire compared to their wives,” French told PsyPost.

Still, the authors note that biological factors are not the only influences on sexual functioning within couples. “Other factors were predictive of dyadic sexual desire overall,” French noted. “Take marital satisfaction, for example—people who were more satisfied with their marriages reported feeling more sexual desire for their partners—but these factors did not seem to account for the difference between men’s and women’s levels of sexual desire in the way that differences in testosterone levels did.”

Notably, higher daily positive mood also predicted stronger daily dyadic sexual desire, although this variable similarly did not account for sex differences.

“Sexual desire for one’s long-term partner is complex and can be influenced by many factors,” French said. “We did our best to account for as many factors as we could, but there are additional factors that need to be considered in the future. For example, women are less likely to experience orgasms from partnered sex compared to men, and this difference could additionally lead to differences in men’s versus women’s sexual desire for each other.”

The findings may have also implications for couples sex therapy. “In addition to advancing theory on processes that underlie sexual desire in long-term relationships, these insights could also enable people to better understand why discrepancies in sexual desire between partners occur and thereby limit the extent to which people might attribute sexual difficulties to problems in their relationships,” French explained.

One limitation of the study was that there were no daily measures of testosterone, preventing researchers from exploring how individual variations in testosterone may relate to daily fluctuations in sexual desire.

“Additionally, this work can really only speak to differences in sexual desire experienced by partners in mixed-sex relationships—we need more work in the future to examine the extent to which people in same-sex relationships, as well as other diverse forms of relationships, experience discrepancies in sexual desire for their partners and what the underlying mechanisms for those discrepancies may be,” French said.

The study, “An empirical investigation of the roles of biological, relational, cognitive, and emotional factors in explaining sex differences in dyadic sexual desire”, was authored by Juliana E. French, James K. McNulty, Anastasia Makhanova, Jon K. Maner, Lisa A. Eckel, Larissa Nikonova, and Andrea L. Meltzer.

Previous Post

Psychologists demonstrate why feeling appreciated is particularly important for avoidantly attached individuals

Next Post

New study explores the psychological mechanisms linking gambling to psychopathy

RELATED

New research: AI models tend to reflect the political ideologies of their creators
Artificial Intelligence

New research: AI models tend to reflect the political ideologies of their creators

February 26, 2026
Scientists tracked a two-word phrase across millions of books to uncover a major difference in sexual psychology
Relationships and Sexual Health

Blaming a partner for shared pornography use buffers relationship dissatisfaction in women

February 25, 2026
Depression might unlock a more independent mind at the ballot box
Political Psychology

People who believe they contribute to society are more likely to vote and engage in politics

February 25, 2026
The power of the point: The science of Donald Trump’s gestures
Donald Trump

Donald Trump gained 2024 votes in areas where inflation was worse, study finds

February 25, 2026
Scientists tracked a two-word phrase across millions of books to uncover a major difference in sexual psychology
Narcissism

Narcissists are persuasive speakers but terrible writers, study finds

February 25, 2026
Scientists tracked a two-word phrase across millions of books to uncover a major difference in sexual psychology
Evolutionary Psychology

The science behind why we prefer the smell of our own farts

February 25, 2026
Being adopted doesn’t change how teens handle love and dating
Attractiveness

Early physical attractiveness predicts a more socially effective personality in adulthood

February 25, 2026
Scientists tracked a two-word phrase across millions of books to uncover a major difference in sexual psychology
Relationships and Sexual Health

Scientists tracked a two-word phrase across millions of books to uncover a major difference in sexual psychology

February 25, 2026

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

New research: AI models tend to reflect the political ideologies of their creators

Blaming a partner for shared pornography use buffers relationship dissatisfaction in women

People who believe they contribute to society are more likely to vote and engage in politics

Ketamine blocks the short-term anxiety and social withdrawal linked to adolescent social defeat

Donald Trump gained 2024 votes in areas where inflation was worse, study finds

Narcissists are persuasive speakers but terrible writers, study finds

The science behind why we prefer the smell of our own farts

Early physical attractiveness predicts a more socially effective personality in adulthood

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc