Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology

Study suggests politicians’ incivility on social media tends to backfire

by Emily Manis
July 19, 2023
in Political Psychology
Donald Trump speaking during a Turning Point Action event in 2020. (Photo credit: Gage Skidmore)

Donald Trump speaking during a Turning Point Action event in 2020. (Photo credit: Gage Skidmore)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Follow PsyPost on Google News

During times of intense political disagreement, politicians sometimes abandon civility and resort to disrespectful behavior. But how does this impact public opinion? According to a study published in Social Psychological and Personality Science, incivility doesn’t attract public interest as previously thought. Instead, it tends to elicit negative reactions from the general public.

Incivility refers to the use of rude or disrespectful language, such as name-calling, mockery, and vulgarity. Some believe that employing incivility in politics can capture the public’s attention, leading to advantages like a larger audience and greater influence. However, this study challenges the notion that incivility is an effective political strategy. It explores the possibility that incivility may actually result in moral disapproval and decreased interest from the public.

The study, conducted by Matthew Feinberg and Jeremy A. Frimer, consisted of multiple research methods, including longitudinal and experimental approaches. For example, in studies 1a and 1b, the researchers analyzed the Twitter feeds of Donald Trump and Joe Biden over time. They examined the relationship between incivility in their tweets and the number of new followers gained the following day.

In study 2, the researchers recruited 1,479 participants with diverse political affiliations from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. The participants read civil or uncivil statements from politicians and rated their interest in hearing more from each politician.

Study 3 involved 604 participants recruited through the same platform, and they read civil or uncivil speeches from fictional Democratic or Republican politicians. The participants rated their interest in hearing more, indicated moral approval or disapproval, and assessed the speech’s level of attention-grabbing.

The results of these studies provided evidence that incivility leads to decreased interest in hearing more from a politician, contrary to previous beliefs. Studies 1a and 1b showed a significant drop in the rate of gaining new followers for politicians after engaging in incivility on Twitter.

Study 2 revealed that participants, regardless of their political affiliation, expressed significantly less interest in hearing more from politicians who made uncivil statements.

Study 3 expanded on these findings, demonstrating that participants showed greater interest in civil political discourse. Additionally, there were party differences, as Republican participants were more tolerant of incivility from fictional Republican politicians compared to how Democrats responded to uncivil statements from Democratic politicians. Moral disapproval of incivility played a role in reducing interest.

Overall, these results suggest that incivility is an ineffective political strategy because the public tends to react negatively to it.

Although this study sheds light on the impact of incivility on the public, there are limitations to consider. For example, the longitudinal studies assumed that the public’s interest was influenced by the tweets that followed, but it’s possible that people viewed the tweets before or after expressing their interest. Additionally, this study focused on American participants and the American political system. Future research should investigate how these findings apply more broadly.

In conclusion, the researchers suggest that politicians should behave more civilly if they want to have influence. However, it’s worth noting that there might be other functions of incivility that offset the loss of interest. “Politicians might willingly impair interest if their uncivil rhetoric poses even more damage to political opponents’ reputations. In addition, if incivility depresses interest in politics in general, incumbents worried the electorate is turning on them might benefit by using incivility to minimize voter turnout,” the researchers wrote.

“Relatedly, it is unclear whether incivility minimizes interest in the politician acting uncivilly, or in that politician’s party in general. Research on the radical flank effect (Simpson et al., 2022), wherein radical groups in social movement lead observers to support more moderate groups of that same movement and suggests uncivil politicians could make civil politicians in their party look better via contrast effects. Thus, even if uncivil politicians decrease the public’s interest in them, they may be building interest in their party members. Future research should explore these important questions relating to how incivility influences interest.”

The study, “Incivility Diminishes Interest in What Politicians Have to Say“, was authored by Matthew Feinberg and Jeremy A. Frimer.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

New psychology study sheds light on mysterious “feelings of presence” during isolation
Political Psychology

People who think “everyone agrees with me” are more likely to support populism

July 1, 2025

People who wrongly believe that most others share their political views are more likely to support populist ideas, according to a new study. These false beliefs can erode trust in democratic institutions and fuel resentment toward political elites.

Read moreDetails
Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds
Political Psychology

Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds

June 28, 2025

A new study finds that voters are more motivated by radical political leaders than moderates, because supporting bold causes makes them feel personally significant—driving greater activism, sacrifice, and long-term engagement across elections in the United States and Poland.

Read moreDetails
Political ambivalence has a surprising relationship with support for violence
Authoritarianism

New study sheds light on the psychological roots of collective violence

June 21, 2025

A new study from Lebanon finds that people with authoritarian beliefs tend to oppose violence against political leaders, while those high in social dominance orientation are more likely to support violence against rival group members.

Read moreDetails
Epistemic mistrust and dogmatism predict preference for authoritarian-looking leaders
Authoritarianism

Epistemic mistrust and dogmatism predict preference for authoritarian-looking leaders

June 20, 2025

A new study suggests that the way people learn to trust others early in life can shape their political ideology and preference for strong, dominant leaders—though not directly, but through dogmatic thinking and broader political attitudes.

Read moreDetails
Individual traits, not environment, predict gun violence among gun-carrying youth
Political Psychology

Republican women and Democratic men often break with party lines on gun policy

June 19, 2025

New research shows that Americans’ views on gun policy are shaped by the intersection of gender and partisanship, with Republican women and Democratic men often expressing positions that differ from those typically associated with their party.

Read moreDetails
Troubling study shows “politics can trump truth” to a surprising degree, regardless of education or analytical ability
Donald Trump

Racial insecurity helped shield Trump from Republican backlash after Capitol riot, study suggests

June 18, 2025

Despite widespread condemnation of the January 6th attack, many white Republicans remained loyal to Trump—especially those who perceived anti-white discrimination. A new study shows how racial status threat can protect political leaders from the consequences of norm violations.

Read moreDetails
Poor sleep may shrink brain regions vulnerable to Alzheimer’s disease, study suggests
Political Psychology

Christian nationalists tend to imagine God as benevolent, angry over sins, and engaged

June 14, 2025

Christians who believe God is benevolent, engaged, and angered by sin are more likely to support religious nationalism, according to a new study. This worldview was also associated with conspiracy mentality and xenophobic attitudes.

Read moreDetails
Fear predicts authoritarian attitudes across cultures, with conservatives most affected
Authoritarianism

Fear predicts authoritarian attitudes across cultures, with conservatives most affected

June 13, 2025

A sweeping study of over 84,000 people across 59 countries found that individuals who feel threatened by crime, poverty, or instability are more likely to support authoritarian governance—especially in Western nations and among politically right-leaning individuals.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Could creatine slow cognitive decline? Mouse study reveals promising effects on brain aging

ChatGPT and “cognitive debt”: New study suggests AI might be hurting your brain’s ability to think

Frequent dreams and nightmares surged worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic

Vagus nerve signals influence food intake more in higher socio-economic groups

People who think “everyone agrees with me” are more likely to support populism

What is the most attractive body fat percentage for men? New research offers an answer

Longer antidepressant use linked to more severe, long-lasting withdrawal symptoms, study finds

New psychology study sheds light on mysterious “feelings of presence” during isolation

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy