PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Autonomous machines: Are chess robots leading to Judgment Day?

by Taylor & Francis
April 19, 2014
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Photo credit: Chris Isherwood

Photo credit: Chris Isherwood

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Next time you play a computer at chess, think about the implications if you beat it. It could be a very sore loser!

A study just published in the Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence reflects upon the growing need for autonomous technology, and suggests that humans should be very careful to prevent future systems from developing anti-social and potentially harmful behaviour.

Modern military and economic pressures require autonomous systems that can react quickly – and without human input. These systems will be required to make rational decisions for themselves.

Researcher Steve Omohundro writes: “When roboticists are asked by nervous onlookers about safety, a common answer is ‘We can always unplug it!’ But imagine this outcome from the chess robot’s point of view. A future in which it is unplugged is a future in which it cannot play or win any games of chess”.

Like a plot from The Terminator movie, we are suddenly faced with the prospect of real threat from autonomous systems unless they are designed very carefully. Like a human being or animal seeking self-preservation, a rational machine could exert the following harmful or anti-social behaviours:

  • Self-protection, as exampled above.
  • Resource acquisition, through cyber theft, manipulation or domination.
  • Improved efficiency, through alternative utilisation of resources.
  • Self-improvement, such as removing design constraints if doing so is deemed advantageous.

The study highlights the vulnerability of current autonomous systems to hackers and malfunctions, citing past accidents that have caused multi-billion dollars’ worth of damage, or loss of human life. Unfortunately, the task of designing more rational systems that can safeguard against the malfunctions that occurred in these accidents is a more complex task that is immediately apparent:

“Harmful systems might at first appear to be harder to design or less powerful than safe systems. Unfortunately, the opposite is the case. Most simple utility functions will cause harmful behaviour and it is easy to design simple utility functions that would be extremely harmful.”

This fascinating study concludes by stressing the extreme caution that should be used in designing and deploying future rational technology. It suggests a sequence of provably safe systems should first be developed, and then applied to all future autonomous systems. That should keep future chess robots in check.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources
TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Adolescent narcissism brings brief popularity but not likeability among peers, study finds
  • A 20-minute workout protects memory after sleep loss just as well as a 90-minute nap
  • How personality and social context shape adolescent loneliness
  • Weightlifting offers large antidepressant effects for young women with anxiety, regardless of intensity
  • Brain scans reveal how recurrent depression leaves a lasting mark on the amygdala

Science of Money

  • Why highly adaptable business clients aren’t always the most satisfied
  • The four ways underdog startups survive corporate giants
  • How AI-generated plain English changes investor interest in mutual funds
  • What 18 years of brokerage data reveals about selling losing stocks
  • When edgy brands meet manipulative consumers: The backfire effect of dark personalities

Recent

  • A child’s genetic profile for ADHD can predict their parents’ risk of separation
  • Universal two-child policy linked to increased depression among Chinese women
  • Are gender differences really power differences? Large-scale analysis finds strong behavioral parallels
  • Body roundness index linked to depression risk in older adults with dementia
  • A specific thinking style explains why dark personality traits are linked to creativity
  • Private touch matters more than public affection for relationship quality
  • MDMA-enhanced couples therapy shows promise for treating PTSD and relationship distress
  • Adolescent narcissism brings brief popularity but not likeability among peers, study finds
  • Unintentional mind wandering disrupts attention in ADHD through two different mechanisms
  • How virtual reality is changing brain-training technology

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc