Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Greedy people have more money but are less satisfied with their lives, according to new study

by Beth Ellwood
February 8, 2023
in Social Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

A Dutch study published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin suggests that greed may be good for our pockets but comes at a psychological cost. The findings revealed that greedy people tended to have higher household incomes but lower life satisfaction.

Greed can be described as a constant desire to acquire more of something, often to the detriment of others. Throughout history, greed has been denounced as an unfavorable characteristic that is disadvantageous for society. Across religions and around the world, the trait is typically viewed as immoral and sinful.

Psychology research has largely backed up this negative view of greed, showing that greed is associated with harmful behavior as well as dark personality traits. However, few studies have examined whether greed might be associated with positive outcomes for the individual. For example, an economic view suggests that greed can be advantageous when it comes to generating productivity and wealth.

“Greed has a very negative connotation; nobody aspires to be labelled ‘greedy.’ It is often condemned and suppressed because it regularly causes harm to others and society as a whole,” said study author Karlijn Hoyer, a lecturer at Tilburg University. “Still greed is ubiquitous, suggesting that it must have some benefits for the greedy person him/herself. This made me wonder, is there anything that greed is good for?”

Hoyer and her colleagues conducted a study to assess the life outcomes associated with being greedy. To do this, they obtained data from a longitudinal study involving a representative sample of Dutch individuals between the ages of 16 and 95. For the current analysis, the final sample consisted of 2,367 participants.

Participants filled out questionnaires that included measures of dispositional greed and the related concept of self-interest. The surveys also measured psychological outcomes (life satisfaction), economic outcomes (personal gross monthly income and gross household income), and evolutionary outcomes (number of biological children, duration of one’s longest relationship, and number of sexual partners).

The survey results revealed that higher greed was associated with higher household income, but not personal income. Being greedy was also associated with having a higher number of sexual partners, but a lower number of biological children and shorter romantic relationships. Finally, being greedy was associated with lower life satisfaction.

“Being greedy has some positive and some negative outcomes for the greedy person him/herself: greed is (somewhat) beneficial for economic outcomes (more income), but mixed for evolutionary outcomes (less children and shorter romantic relationships, but more sexual partners), and unfavorable for psychological outcomes (lower satisfaction with life),” Hoyer told PsyPost. “Furthermore, greed differs from self-interest in relation to these outcomes. In short, greed may be good for income but bad for happiness.”

Hoyer and colleagues note a few reasons why greediness might lead to higher earnings at the household level. It could be that people who are greedy push their partners to work harder and to earn more money. Alternatively, greedy people might choose partners with more money in the first place. A third variable could also be at play — for example, having fewer children to look after might leave greedy people with more income since parents are able to spend more time and energy at work.

“Most of the time when people refer to greed, they refer to the strong desire for more money and material things,” Hoyer told PsyPost. “It becomes clearer and clearer, however, that greed can also be experienced for other nonmaterialistic desires, such as status, friends and sex. I found it surprising to see that greed has such a big influence on people’s social romantic life: greedy people has less children and shorter romantic relationships, but more sexual partners.”

The finding that greedy people are less satisfied with their lives might be explained by the fact that greedy people are perpetually dissatisfied with what they have and constantly chasing more. It could also be an indirect effect through less satisfying social relationships. For example, greedy people were found to have smaller families and shorter-lasting romantic relationships which may have a negative effect on well-being.

Notably, the concept of self-interest revealed a different pattern of findings, which showed fewer significant associations with the measured outcomes. Still, self-interest and greed were found to be independently correlated with lower life satisfaction, which suggests that “being greedy and being self-interested makes you unhappy in their own way.”

“Even though this research gives some valuable insights in the effect of greed, the data is correlational. Therefore, we can not determine the direction of the effects,” Hoyer noted. “For example: Do people become unhappy in life, because they are greedy? Or do people become greedy because they are unhappy?”

“Future research should further investigate this and should also take a look at the underlying mechanisms — e.g., is it a deliberate choice of greedy individuals to have fewer children, or is this a result of unsuccessful relational bonding (because greedy people are not the nicest people to be in a relationship with)?”

“Greed is not only bad, it also has some benefits for the individual (e.g., higher income) as well as society as a whole (stimulating productivity and economic growth),” Hoyer added. “Ideally, future research should find a way to temper the bad sides of greed and take advantage of the good sides of it.”

The study, “Greed: What Is It Good for?”, was authored by Karlijn Hoyer, Marcel Zeelenberg, and Seger M. Breugelmans.

RELATED

Psychologists pinpoint a subtle sign of relationship quality
Relationships and Sexual Health

Free-choice and arranged marriages do not differ in their love scores, study finds

January 24, 2026
Husbands of employed wives report greater happiness and self-esteem
Relationships and Sexual Health

New research maps the psychological pathway from body appreciation to relationship satisfaction

January 24, 2026
Can music heal emotional wounds? New research suggests it might
Music

Popular lyrics keep getting darker and dumber, but there was a surprising shift during the first Trump presidency

January 24, 2026
Donald Trump weaponizes humor through “dark play” to test boundaries
Donald Trump

Donald Trump weaponizes humor through “dark play” to test boundaries

January 24, 2026
Narcissism study sheds new light on the relationship between grandiose and vulnerable subtypes
Anxiety

General anxiety predicts conspiracy beliefs while political anxiety does not

January 23, 2026
Gut-brain axis: Study uncovers microbiota differences in impulsive and non-impulsive female convicts
Psychopathy

Psychopathic female criminals exhibit unexpected patterns of emotional processing

January 23, 2026
Neuroforecasting: New research shows brain activity can predict crowd preferences
Social Psychology

158 scientists used the same data, but their politics predicted the results

January 23, 2026
People who support authoritarianism tend to endorse election conspiracy beliefs
Authoritarianism

People who support authoritarianism tend to endorse election conspiracy beliefs

January 22, 2026

PsyPost Merch

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Free-choice and arranged marriages do not differ in their love scores, study finds

AI identifies behavioral traits that predict alcohol preference during adolescence

New research maps the psychological pathway from body appreciation to relationship satisfaction

Motivation acts as a camera lens that shapes how memories form

Popular lyrics keep getting darker and dumber, but there was a surprising shift during the first Trump presidency

Genetic factors likely confound the link between c-sections and offspring mental health

Major new study finds psilocybin microdoses improve the quality of creative ideas but not the quantity

Donald Trump weaponizes humor through “dark play” to test boundaries

RSS Psychology of Selling

  • New research links faking emotions to higher turnover in B2B sales
  • How defending your opinion changes your confidence
  • The science behind why accessibility drives revenue in the fashion sector
  • How AI and political ideology intersect in the market for sensitive products
  • Researchers track how online shopping is related to stress
         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy