How a parent’s motivation influences their child’s writing skills

Parents who help their children with writing activities because they genuinely enjoy or value the process have children who display more positive attitudes toward the subject. These positive attitudes are then linked to better writing performance in the classroom. This research was published in the Journal of Writing Research.

Learning to write is a highly social process that requires consistent practice both inside and outside the classroom. While teachers provide formal instruction on grammar and text structure, parents often facilitate informal writing experiences at home. Educational psychologists view writing as a community effort. A child’s ability to communicate on paper is shaped by the social and cultural environment in which they learn.

Despite the importance of writing for future academic and professional success, research into home-based learning often focuses heavily on reading. Less is known about how parents support their children’s writing development. Specifically, researchers want to know what motivates parents to get involved in the first place.

Psychologists often divide human motivation into two distinct categories. Autonomous motivation describes doing something because it is intrinsically enjoyable or personally meaningful. For a parent, this might mean helping a child write a story because they believe the activity is important for the child’s growth.

Controlled motivation involves acting out of guilt, shame, or a sense of external obligation. A parent acting on controlled motivation might help with homework solely to avoid feeling like they are failing in their duties.

Free daily newsletter

Bronte Kelso-Marsh, a researcher at Edith Cowan University, led a team to investigate how these different parental motivations relate to children’s writing skills. Kelso-Marsh worked with Anabela Abreu Malpique, Helen Davis, and Debora Similieana Valcan. The researchers wanted to understand if the underlying reasons parents help their children write are connected to how often they participate in home writing activities. They also aimed to see if this involvement is associated with how children feel about writing and how well they perform.

The researchers recruited 159 children in their second year of primary school, along with their parents or caregivers. The students attended twelve different schools in the Perth metropolitan region of Western Australia. These schools represented a range of socioeconomic backgrounds.

To measure the children’s attitudes toward writing, researchers conducted brief one-on-one interviews. They asked the children how much they liked writing and how they felt about writing stories on paper. Because the children were around seven years old, they responded by pointing to a visual scale of faces that ranged from awful to fantastic. Overall, the children reported generally positive feelings toward writing.

To assess writing quality, the researchers gave the children ten minutes to write a story based on a standard prompt. The children were asked to write a narrative about finding a robot on the way home from school.

Trained evaluators then scored these handwritten stories on ten specific criteria. The scoring system evaluated the children’s vocabulary, sentence structure, punctuation, and spelling. It also graded the narratives on broader concepts like character development, text structure, and how well the story engaged the reader.

The parents completed a comprehensive survey about their involvement in their children’s writing at home. The survey asked how often they engaged in everyday writing activities with their children. These activities included writing greeting cards, making shopping lists, playing word games, or doing free writing. Free writing involves writing for fun without a strict purpose or grading rubric.

Parents also answered questions designed to measure their autonomous and controlled motivations. To measure autonomous motivation, parents rated how much they agreed with statements about enjoying helping their child or valuing the benefits of writing. To measure controlled motivation, parents responded to statements about feeling guilty if they did not take part in their child’s writing activities.

The researchers analyzed the data using a mathematical technique that maps direct and indirect relationships between multiple variables. They found that parents who reported higher levels of autonomous motivation were more likely to frequently engage in home writing activities with their children. Enjoyment and a belief in the value of writing appeared to drive active participation.

Parents who were primarily driven by controlled motivation did not report engaging in writing activities any more frequently than other parents. Feelings of guilt or external pressure did not translate into more time spent writing with their children. In fact, higher controlled motivation was associated with children having slightly less favorable attitudes toward writing, though this specific relationship was not the main focus of the mathematical model.

The frequency of home writing activities was directly linked to the children’s attitudes. Children who regularly practiced writing with their parents tended to view writing more favorably.

The data also showed a positive relationship between a child’s attitude toward writing and the quality of their written stories. Children who liked writing produced stories with better structure, grammar, and vocabulary.

Through their statistical model, the researchers traced an indirect path linking the parents’ internal motivation to the children’s final writing quality. Parents who valued writing and enjoyed helping were more active in home writing activities. This shared activity was associated with their children developing positive attitudes. Those positive attitudes were then linked to higher scores on the narrative writing assessment.

The data revealed an unexpected pattern regarding parents who reported high autonomous motivation but low actual involvement. When the mathematical model isolated the effect of parents who valued writing but did not actively participate in writing activities, the children tended to have less favorable attitudes toward writing.

The researchers suggest that simply believing writing is important is not enough to help a child develop a positive mindset. The belief must translate into tangible, shared activities. If a parent values writing but forces a reluctant child to participate without making it an engaging activity, it might create conflict that harms the child’s attitude.

Because the study relies on observing existing behaviors at a single point in time, it cannot prove that parental motivation causes changes in children’s writing. It is possible that the relationship operates in the opposite direction. For example, parents might find it more enjoyable and rewarding to help a child who already likes writing and possesses strong writing skills. A child who struggles with writing might resist help, making the process less enjoyable for the parent.

The assessment of writing quality was also limited to a single narrative story prompt. Children might perform differently when asked to write informational texts or persuasive arguments. The researchers recommend that future studies evaluate multiple types of writing to get a broader picture of a child’s academic abilities. Identifying how parent involvement relates to specific skills like spelling versus idea generation requires larger sample sizes.

Future research could also explore other factors that prevent motivated parents from helping their children. Time constraints, cultural differences, and a parent’s confidence in their own writing abilities likely dictate how often they engage in these activities. By tracking families over several years, scientists could better understand how parental involvement shapes academic development over time.

The study, “Motivation Matters: The Positive Influence of Parental Involvement on Children’s Writing Outcome,” was authored by Bronte Kelso-Marsh, Anabela Abreu Malpique, Helen Davis, and Debora Similieana Valcan.