PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology

Masculine honor beliefs linked to disapproval of National Anthem protests, study finds

by Eric W. Dolan
November 4, 2018
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Beliefs about masculine honor and the propensity to make attributions of prejudice are both related to how people judge anti-racism protests during the National Anthem, according to new research published in the journal Personality and Individual Differences.

“As social psychologists, we are interested in understanding the various factors that influence people’s perceptions of social minority groups, and how this may lead to people expressing prejudice towards members of these groups,” said Evelyn Stratmoen of Kansas State University, the corresponding author of the study.

“The NFL players’ protests of the National Anthem we found particularly interesting, due to the extremely polarized viewpoints surrounding the protests and what it represents. On one hand, there are those who support the players protesting and the underlying reason for the protests — that police violence against racial minorities is a social issue that must be addressed. And on the other hand, there are those who believe that protesting during the National Anthem is an act of disrespect toward the United States and toward our veterans.”

“As such, we wanted to examine how masculine honor ideology – a set of norms where men are expected to use aggression to protect their reputation, family, and community that are associated with defending against threats to one’s country – as well as sensitivity to racial prejudice influenced people’s perceptions of the protests and of the players,” Stratmoen explained.

Across two studies, which included 508 participants in total, the researchers found that masculine honor beliefs were associated with how people perceived NFL players’ protests during the National Anthem.

People who agreed with statements such as “It is important for a man to be able to take pain,” “A man should be embarrassed if someone calls him a wimp,” and “If your son got into a fight, you would be proud that he stood up for himself” were more likely to view protests during the National Anthem as inappropriate.

“People who strongly endorse masculine honor norms are more likely to perceive the NFL National Anthem protests as being inappropriate and disrespectful toward America and are less likely to perceive police violence against racial minorities as being a social issue. They are also more likely to perceive Black NFL players who knelt as ‘dishonorable’ and perceive White NFL players who stood as ‘honorable,'” Stratmoen told PsyPost.

The tendency to attribute causes of behavior to racism was also linked to perceptions of National Anthem protests. Participants who agreed with statements such as “Racist behavior is more widespread than people think it is” and “You’ll see lots of racism if you look for it” were more likely to view the protests as appropriate.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

“However, people who are more sensitive to racial prejudice are more likely to perceive the protests as being appropriate and respectful as well as more likely to perceive police violence against racial minorities as an issue. They are also more likely perceive a White player who knelt as ‘honorable’ and a White player who stood as ‘dishonorable’. Therefore, masculine honor ideology and sensitivity to racial prejudice influence perceptions of the NFL players’ protests of/during the National Anthem,” Stratmoen said.

But the study — like all research — includes some caveats.

“We did not control for if participants were NFL football fans or had prior contact with the military or police. It may be possible that football fans or those with prior military/police contact could exhibit more(or less) lenient beliefs regarding the protests, regardless of honor ideology or sensitivity to racial prejudice,” Stratmoen said.

“We also did not include participants who did selected reasons for the NFL players protesting that were not discussed in the widespread media (i.e., President Trump’s immigration policies; Racial differences in salary pay within the NFL).

“Even though we were only interested in examining the perceptions of those who had reasonable prior knowledge of the protests, this does not mean that those who are not as well-informed would not have perceptions and opinions regarding the protests or the players who protest during the National Anthem.”

“We are currently investigating how adherence to masculine honor norms interacts with sensitivity to racial prejudice in perceptions of police violence toward racial minorities, and what other factors moderate these perceptions, including gender and race of the police officer,” Stratmoen added.

The study, “Taking a knee: Perceptions of NFL player protests during the National Anthem“, was authored by Evelyn Stratmoen⁎, Tiffany J. Lawless, and Donald A. Saucier.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin4ShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Why is autism increasing? Scientists are converging on an unglamorous answer
  • High smartphone dependency linked to altered time allocation in teens
  • A popular workout supplement might protect the brain from gut inflammation
  • Musicians are less prone to the ventriloquism illusion, study finds
  • Researchers identify a factor linked to how much happier couples are than singles

Science of Money

  • Spending crypto triggers more guilt than spending cash, study finds
  • How giving AI a personality changes the way consumers buy
  • How short expert recommendation lists change online shopping behavior
  • Why saying “I like it” is more persuasive than “you will like it,” according to psychology
  • When wives earn more, do husbands do more chores?

Recent

  • New compounds target clumping enzyme to protect brain cells in Alzheimer’s models
  • Weight loss medications alter how the brain and kidneys manage body fluids
  • Why is autism increasing? Scientists are converging on an unglamorous answer
  • Sleep loss reduces muscle endurance by rewiring brain networks, study finds
  • Psilocybin therapy has mostly reached the well-off. A small Oregon study tested a cheaper group model for low-income patients
  • Hiring bias against transgender women depends on both identity and appearance, field experiment suggests
  • Many people judge candidates and policies by a single deciding feature, new research suggests
  • Oxytocin amplifies negative childhood memories for anxiously attached adults
  • Some adults’ brains look older than their age, and gut biology may be part of the picture
  • Family genetics study questions the role of genetic nurture in ADHD

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc