Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology

Economic inequality diminishes voter preference for competent leaders

by Eric W. Dolan
May 3, 2024
in Political Psychology
(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay informed on the latest psychology and neuroscience research—follow PsyPost on LinkedIn for daily updates and insights.

A recent study published in the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin has found a significant link between economic inequality and voter behavior. The research, involving six experiments with over 1,900 participants from China and the United Kingdom, found that higher levels of economic inequality tend to reduce voters’ preferences for competent political leaders.

The motivation behind the study stems from a growing concern about how economic inequality might be reshaping the political landscape in democratic societies. Recent elections around the globe have highlighted a shift in voter behavior, with an apparent increase in support for populist, dominant, and even extremist leaders. This shift is believed to be influenced by the rising economic disparities observed in many countries.

Traditionally, two key attributes — competence and warmth — have been central to how voters evaluate political candidates. However, despite their importance, there had been little research exploring how these attributes are affected by economic inequality.

“My interest in this topic was primarily driven by a desire to contribute to our understanding of how economic inequality shapes democratic processes. While it’s widely recognized that economic inequality can undermine social cohesion and political stability, its specific role in shaping the pattern of people’s leadership preferences remained less clear. By looking into this relationship and the psychological mechanisms at play, we aimed to take a small step forward in unravelling this complex dynamic,” explained study author Feiteng Long, a PhD candidate in Social, Economic and Organizational Psychology at Leiden University.

The researchers utilized a controlled experimental design known as the “Bimboola” paradigm to simulate different levels of economic inequality within a society. In these experiments, participants were introduced to a hypothetical society called “V,” characterized by varying levels of economic inequality. The scenarios were constructed to depict societies with high and low economic inequality.

In the high inequality condition, participants read about a society with significant income disparities between different social classes and a lack of supportive tax policies for lower-income groups. Conversely, the low inequality condition described a society with smaller income gaps and more progressive taxation favoring the economically disadvantaged.

Participants’ social status within these societies was also manipulated to assess whether voter preferences varied with personal economic standing. They were asked to imagine themselves as either belonging to a higher or lower social status group, which helped isolate the effect of participants’ perceived social position on their political preferences.

The main dependent variable in the study was the participants’ preferences for hypothetical political leaders described primarily in terms of their competence. These leaders were presented through descriptions emphasizing their ability to perform their duties effectively, make informed decisions, and handle complex problems—qualities essential for competent governance.

The researchers also measured secondary variables such as the perceived likelihood that these leaders would care about the populace and their potential to abuse power. These perceptions were evaluated to understand the psychological mechanisms through which economic inequality might influence voter behavior.

Across six separate experiments, higher economic inequality led to a diminished preference for competent leaders. This effect persisted regardless of the participants’ own social status, suggesting that the impact of economic disparity on political preferences is a general phenomenon rather than confined to any specific economic group.

The decrease in preference for competent leaders was mediated by voters’ perceptions of the leaders’ intentions and capabilities. Specifically, high economic inequality was found to increase perceptions that politicians are less likely to care about the general populace and more prone to abuse their power.

These perceptions contributed to voters’ reluctance to support candidates they otherwise regarded as competent. This suggests that in unequal societies, the electorate may fear that competent leaders could use their abilities not to advance public good but to further personal or in-group interests at the expense of societal equality and fairness.

“For the average person, the key takeaway is the critical importance of addressing economic inequality for the health of democracy and effective governance,” Long told PsyPost. “As demonstrated in our study, economic inequality fosters negative perceptions of politicians by amplifying concerns about their indifference to the public’s needs, regardless of their competence. Our findings warn that increasing economic inequality can erode trust in government and fuel populist sentiments.”

But the study, like all research, includes some caveats.

“Firstly, like other experimental studies, the experimental manipulation was highly de-contextualized, potentially limiting the generalizability of our findings to more natural settings,” Long noted. “Moreover, recent theoretical development has subdivided competence into three distinct sub-dimensions, namely competence, assertiveness, and effort. It’s unknown whether the influence of economic inequality on preferences for competent leaders varies across these sub-dimensions of competence. Future research needs to disentangle these complexities, providing a more nuanced understanding of the dynamics at play.”

“We are currently exploring further moral consequences of economic inequality,” Long said. “In the future, we aim to extend our research on economic inequality methodologically. We plan to adopt the experience sampling method to investigate the influence of daily perceptions of economic inequality. Additionally, we will employ a psychophysiological approach to examine stress reactions to economic inequality in a lab setting.”

The study, “Economic Inequality Reduces Preferences for Competent Leaders,” was authored by Feiteng Long, Zi Ye, and Guohua Liu.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin1ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds
Political Psychology

Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds

June 28, 2025

A new study finds that voters are more motivated by radical political leaders than moderates, because supporting bold causes makes them feel personally significant—driving greater activism, sacrifice, and long-term engagement across elections in the United States and Poland.

Read moreDetails
Political ambivalence has a surprising relationship with support for violence
Authoritarianism

New study sheds light on the psychological roots of collective violence

June 21, 2025

A new study from Lebanon finds that people with authoritarian beliefs tend to oppose violence against political leaders, while those high in social dominance orientation are more likely to support violence against rival group members.

Read moreDetails
Epistemic mistrust and dogmatism predict preference for authoritarian-looking leaders
Authoritarianism

Epistemic mistrust and dogmatism predict preference for authoritarian-looking leaders

June 20, 2025

A new study suggests that the way people learn to trust others early in life can shape their political ideology and preference for strong, dominant leaders—though not directly, but through dogmatic thinking and broader political attitudes.

Read moreDetails
Individual traits, not environment, predict gun violence among gun-carrying youth
Political Psychology

Republican women and Democratic men often break with party lines on gun policy

June 19, 2025

New research shows that Americans’ views on gun policy are shaped by the intersection of gender and partisanship, with Republican women and Democratic men often expressing positions that differ from those typically associated with their party.

Read moreDetails
Troubling study shows “politics can trump truth” to a surprising degree, regardless of education or analytical ability
Donald Trump

Racial insecurity helped shield Trump from Republican backlash after Capitol riot, study suggests

June 18, 2025

Despite widespread condemnation of the January 6th attack, many white Republicans remained loyal to Trump—especially those who perceived anti-white discrimination. A new study shows how racial status threat can protect political leaders from the consequences of norm violations.

Read moreDetails
Poor sleep may shrink brain regions vulnerable to Alzheimer’s disease, study suggests
Political Psychology

Christian nationalists tend to imagine God as benevolent, angry over sins, and engaged

June 14, 2025

Christians who believe God is benevolent, engaged, and angered by sin are more likely to support religious nationalism, according to a new study. This worldview was also associated with conspiracy mentality and xenophobic attitudes.

Read moreDetails
Fear predicts authoritarian attitudes across cultures, with conservatives most affected
Authoritarianism

Fear predicts authoritarian attitudes across cultures, with conservatives most affected

June 13, 2025

A sweeping study of over 84,000 people across 59 countries found that individuals who feel threatened by crime, poverty, or instability are more likely to support authoritarian governance—especially in Western nations and among politically right-leaning individuals.

Read moreDetails
New research links certain types of narcissism to anti-immigrant attitudes
Narcissism

New research links certain types of narcissism to anti-immigrant attitudes

June 13, 2025

New research published in Behavioral Sciences shows that certain narcissistic traits are linked to anti-immigrant attitudes through competitive worldviews and ideological beliefs, highlighting the role of personality in shaping how people view immigrants and social hierarchies.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

New study reveals how MDMA rewires serotonin and oxytocin systems in the brain

Ghosting and ‘breadcrumbing’: the psychological impact of our bad behaviour on dating apps

Older adults who feel criticized by loved ones are more likely to develop depression

New study exposes gap between ADHD drug use and safety research in children

People who are more likely to die seem to care less about the future

Researchers identify neural mechanism behind memory prioritization

Love addiction linked to memory and attention problems

Positive early experiences may buffer suicidal thoughts in those with trauma symptoms, new study finds

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy