Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive COVID-19

Massive study provides evidence that a cognitive technique can help people psychologically cope with COVID-19

by Eric W. Dolan
August 19, 2021
in COVID-19, Mental Health
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay informed on the latest psychology and neuroscience research—follow PsyPost on LinkedIn for daily updates and insights.

New research published in Nature Human Behaviour suggests that a cognitive strategy can help people to regulate their reactions to emotionally charged events during the COVID-19 pandemic. The technique, known as reappraisal, involves changing how one thinks about a situation to change the emotional response to it.

“As part of the attempt of the Psychological Science Accelerator (PSA) to address pressing questions related to the psychological impact of COVID-19, we aimed to use reappraisal interventions to mitigate negative emotions, increase positive emotions, and enhance psychological resilience in response to the pandemic,” said study author Ke Wang, a doctoral student at Harvard University.

The PSA is a globally distributed network of psychological science laboratories with over 1,200 members in six continents. As its name implies, the project’s mission is to accelerate the accumulation of reliable and generalizable evidence in psychological science by coordinating data collection for selected studies.

“To maximize the impact of these interventions, we had a global reach of large, diverse samples via the PSA’s network, and employed highly scalable methods that were translated for use around the world,” Wang explained.

In the study, which included 21,644 individuals, the participants were shown a series of photographs related to COVID-19 and reported their emotional responses to the images. The researchers examined two types of reappraisal intervention conditions and two different control conditions. The participants were randomly assigned to one of the four conditions.

In the reconstrual condition, the participants were encouraged to find new ways of thinking about the situation, such as realizing that it is only temporary. In the repurposing condition, they were encouraged to refocus their thoughts on whatever good aspects could be found in the situation. In the active control condition, they were encouraged to reflect on their emotions as they unfolded. In the passive control condition, they were asked to respond to the images as they naturally would.

The researchers found that both reconstrual and repurposing decreased negative emotional responses and increased positive emotional responses compared to the control conditions. This was true despite local variations in how severe the pandemic was at the time the study was conducted. There was little difference between the effectiveness of the two reappraisal methods.

“Reappraisal, an emotion-regulation strategy that modifies how one thinks about a situation, effectively reduced negative emotions and increased positive emotions among participants across 87 countries during the COVID-19 pandemic, without reducing intentions to practice preventive health behaviors,” Wang told PsyPost. “The effects of the intervention were not meager, helping ease the emotional toll caused by lockdown and self-isolation.”

The researchers included a few examples of reappraisal in response to COVID-19 in their study, such as “This situation is helping us realize the importance of meaningful social connections, and helping us understand who the most important people in our lives are” (repurposing) and “I know from world history that keeping calm and carrying on gets us through tough times” (reconstrual).

The results provide evidence that cognitive reappraisal can help to mitigate the adverse psychological outcomes associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. But the researchers noted it is unclear how long the benefits last.

“One main limitation relates to the fact that the current study examined only the immediate and proximal effects of the interventions. Future research employing longitudinal designs is needed to examine whether the effects persist over time and at what intervals individuals might optimally engage in reappraisal,” Wang said.

“Another main limitation is that the current study examined only a limited number of outcomes via self-report measures. More comprehensive evaluations, including assessments of actual behaviors (rather than intentions) and health outcomes, are necessary to determine whether there are any additional benefits or unintended consequences of the interventions.”

The study, “A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic“, was published August 2, 2021.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin1ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Depression

The triglyceride-glucose index: Can it predict depression risk in the elderly?

July 14, 2025

Older adults with higher triglyceride-glucose levels were not more likely to develop depression over time after accounting for health and lifestyle factors, suggesting this metabolic marker does not predict future depression in this age group.

Read moreDetails
First human study sheds light on the cognitive and physiological effects of 3-MMC
ADHD

People with ADHD exhibit altered brain activity before making high-stakes choices

July 14, 2025

New research reveals that the brains of adults with ADHD function differently when anticipating risky decisions. They show reduced activation in key areas for self-awareness and emotional integration, offering a neurological basis for challenges with impulsivity and decision-making.

Read moreDetails
New research shows the psychological toll of the 2024 presidential election
Anxiety

New research shows the psychological toll of the 2024 presidential election

July 13, 2025

Among young adults, stress from election news was linked to higher risks of depression and anxiety, while pre-election anticipatory stress was linked to depression only. Stress about the election outcome was not associated with either condition.

Read moreDetails
Pills spilling out of a bottle on a table
ADHD

Methylphenidate: ADHD drug curbs impulsivity in men only, linked to brain wiring differences

July 13, 2025

Researchers found that methylphenidate lowers impulsive choice behavior in men but not women. The effect was associated with the structural integrity of specific white matter tracts in the brain, highlighting potential sex-based differences in drug response.

Read moreDetails
Researchers identify 45 distinct brain connectivity alterations linked to anorexia nervosa
MDMA

Brain scans reveal who may benefit most from MDMA for trauma-related symptoms

July 13, 2025

MDMA-assisted therapy shows promise for trauma, but its effects vary. Now, a study in JAMA Network Open offers a solution: brain scans that measure reactivity to unconscious threat cues can identify individuals most likely to respond positively to the treatment.

Read moreDetails
Frequent egg consumption linked to lower risk of Alzheimer’s dementia, study finds
Alzheimer's Disease

Frequent egg consumption linked to lower risk of Alzheimer’s dementia, study finds

July 12, 2025

Older adults who ate more than one egg per week had a lower risk of developing Alzheimer’s dementia and showed fewer Alzheimer’s-related brain changes. About 39% of this association was explained by higher dietary choline intake from eggs.

Read moreDetails
Liberals and conservatives live differently — but people think the divide is even bigger than it is
Depression

Low sexual activity, body shape, and mood may combine in ways that shorten lives, new study suggests

July 12, 2025

A large American survey finds that adults who have sex fewer than a dozen times a year die sooner when extra abdominal fat coincides with depression, hinting that mood and body shape can combine in a dangerous feedback loop.

Read moreDetails
Liberals and conservatives live differently — but people think the divide is even bigger than it is
Anxiety

Highly irritable teens are more likely to bully others, but anxiety mitigates this tendency

July 12, 2025

Social anxiety weakens the link between irritability and bullying in adolescents—irritable teens are less likely to bully others if they also have social anxiety. This moderating effect was not seen with generalized anxiety or other forms of aggression.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

The triglyceride-glucose index: Can it predict depression risk in the elderly?

People with ADHD exhibit altered brain activity before making high-stakes choices

Narcissistic individuals are more prone to maladaptive daydreaming

Effort or fate? Sexual mindsets predict whether bedroom bliss spills over into broader wellbeing

People who use AI may pay a social price, according to new psychology research

Researchers identify a shared brain pattern behind feeling surprised

New research shows the psychological toll of the 2024 presidential election

Methylphenidate: ADHD drug curbs impulsivity in men only, linked to brain wiring differences

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy