Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

Neuroimaging study shows brain activity corresponds to men’s self-stated sexual orientations

by Eric W. Dolan
April 1, 2017
in Cognitive Science
(Photo credit: yodiyim)

(Photo credit: yodiyim)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

New neuroimaging research has found that gay, bisexual, and straight men have different brain responses to sexual stimuli.

The fMRI study of 26 heterosexual, 28 bisexual, and 25 homosexual men found that sexual orientation was associated with distinct patterns of brain activation. In particular, the researchers uncovered that heterosexual and homosexual men showed different neural responses to erotic stimuli in the ventral striatum, an area of the brain associated with erotic desire.

The erotic stimuli consisted of pictures of nude men, nude women, and lesbian or gay couples engaged in sexual contact. Twelve video clips of men and women masturbating were also used.

As expected, heterosexual men showed greater ventral striatum responses to erotic stimuli of women and homosexual men showed greater ventral striatum responses to erotic stimuli of men, while bisexual men displayed a distinctly bisexual neural response.

The study was published February 1, 2017, in Scientific Reports.

PsyPost interviewed the study’s corresponding author, Adam Safron of Northwestern University. Read his responses below:

PsyPost: Why were you interested in this topic?

Safron: Our lab has studied human sexuality for many years, and we were interested to see what brain scanning technology might tell us about sexual orientation. We wanted to see whether straight, bisexual, and gay men would show patterns of brain activity that corresponded to their sexual orientations. We were particularly interested in an area of the brain called the ventral striatum, which is a highly dopamine-sensitive part of the brain involved in desire.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

What should the average person take away from your study?

We found that desire-related brain activity corresponded to men’s self-stated orientations. Heterosexual men responded more strongly to images of women, gay men responded more strongly to images of men, and bisexual men did not show strongly different responses to erotic images of women and men. These brain activity patterns were consistent with what participants told us they liked and disliked, as well as with previously measured genital arousal patterns. While this may seem obvious, in science you don’t take anything for granted, particularly when it comes to something as complex (and emotionally charged) as human sexuality. Also, some people had doubted whether bisexual men actually had bisexual patterns of arousal and reward. This study suggests that bisexual men are indeed different from gay and straight men in their capacity to respond to both sexes.

Are there any major caveats? What questions still need to be addressed?

It would be interesting to replicate this research with narrative or other kinds of stimuli in the future. We’d also like to find out more about how people’s sexual desires change over time, and whether those vary based on gender and sexual orientation. Also, future research into sexual orientation could look into not just desire, but also aversion. For example, do straight and gay men differ in their degree of aversion toward their non-preferred sex? Do bi men potentially have less aversion toward either sex that leads them to be able to develop arousal toward both sexes? We don’t yet know, and answers to questions like these could shed light on what drives human sexual behavior.

Is there anything else you would like to add?

We are currently finishing research looking at the neural responses of straight, bisexual, and lesbian women, as well as research comparing men and women. Those papers will likely be published in the coming year.

The study, “Neural Correlates of Sexual Orientation in Heterosexual, Bisexual, and Homosexual Men“, was also co-authored by David Sylva, Victoria Klimaj, A. M. Rosenthal, Meng Li, Martin Walter and J. Michael Bailey.

Previous Post

How romantic relationships can help or hinder weight loss

Next Post

What is pup play? Study explores new sexual subculture

RELATED

Live music causes brain waves to synchronize more strongly with rhythm than recorded music
Cognitive Science

Soft brain implants outperform rigid silicon in long-term safety study

April 18, 2026
Live music causes brain waves to synchronize more strongly with rhythm than recorded music
Cognitive Science

Live music causes brain waves to synchronize more strongly with rhythm than recorded music

April 18, 2026
How common is anal sex? Scientific facts about prevalence, pain, pleasure, and more
Cognitive Science

Higher intelligence in adolescence linked to lower mental illness risk in adulthood

April 17, 2026
Sorting Hat research: What does your Hogwarts house say about your psychological makeup?
Cognitive Science

Maturing brain pathways explain the sudden leap in children’s language skills

April 17, 2026
Republican lawmakers lead the trend of using insults to chase media attention instead of policy wins
Business

Children with obesity face a steep decline in adult economic mobility

April 16, 2026
Study reveals lasting impact of compassion training on moral expansiveness
Meditation

A daily mindfulness habit can improve your memory for future plans

April 15, 2026
New study confirms: Thinking hard feels unpleasant
Cognitive Science

Why thinking hard feels bad: the emotional root of deliberation

April 14, 2026
These common sounds can impair your learning, according to new psychology research
Cognitive Science

Your breathing pattern is as unique as a fingerprint

April 12, 2026

STAY CONNECTED

RSS Psychology of Selling

  • Why personalized ads sometimes backfire: A research review explains when tailoring messages works and when it doesn’t
  • The common advice to avoid high customer expectations may not be backed by evidence
  • Personality-matched persuasion works better, but mismatched messages can backfire
  • When happy customers and happy employees don’t add up: How investor signals have shifted in the social media age
  • Correcting fake news about brands does not backfire, five-study experiment finds

LATEST

Early exposure to forever chemicals linked to altered brain genes and impulsive behavior in rats

Soft brain implants outperform rigid silicon in long-term safety study

Disclosing autism to AI chatbots prompts overly cautious, stereotypical advice

Can choking during sex cause brain damage? Emerging evidence points to hidden neurological risks

The decline of hypergamy: How a surge in university degrees changed marriage in the US and France

New research finds a persistent and growing leftward tilt in the social sciences

How a year of regular exercise alters the biology of stress

Scientists tested the creativity of AI models, and the results were surprisingly homogeneous

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc