PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Relationships and Sexual Health Dating

New study indicates that potential partners experience a large penalty for being Black on dating apps

by Eric W. Dolan
July 18, 2021
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

People’s initial decision to choose or reject a potential partner on a dating app is based primarily on their attractiveness and race, according to a new study published in the Journal of Research in Personality. The findings suggest that people of color face barriers to dating on mobile apps such as Tinder.

“Dating on mobile apps has turned traditional dating on its head. A lot of the current research we have on how people meet romantic partners comes from relatively controlled settings — meeting through friends, at work, out in public, or online,” said lead author William J. Chopik, an associate professor and director of the Close Relationships Lab at Michigan State University.

“However, mobile dating apps are completely different. It often involves selecting the eligible range of people we could potentially talk to. In some ways, many of the same things that guide partner selection in other contexts hold true in mobile dating apps. However, there are plenty of new things too. We wanted to find out the factors that went into people swiping and choosing who to talk to on a mobile dating app.”

For their study, Chopik and his colleague, David J. Johnson, developed a Tinder-like app that allowed users to “swipe” right or left on potential partners to choose or reject them. In four separate studies, with 2,679 participants in total, the researchers found that male participants tended to swipe right more often than women, indicating that men were less choosy when picking out potential partners. Both male and female participants who perceived themselves to be more attractive tended to swipe left more often.

Chopik and Johnson also found that participants were more likely to swipe right on potential partners from their own racial group. But even after controlling for this effect, the researchers found that potential partners were penalized for being Black, Asian, or Hispanic.

The penalty for Black individuals was particularly large. Participants were 2.3 to 3.3 times less likely to swipe right on Black versus White partners. The penalty for Hispanic individuals, on the other hand, was small and only appeared in two of the four studies.

“The most consistent finding from our study is that, by far, people use very surface-level features to swipe on romantic partners. Basically, it’s how attractive people are and, more surprisingly, the race of the person. People of color experience a large penalty when navigating these dating apps — they’re less likely to be swiped right on (i.e., chosen) controlling for how attractive they are,” Chopik told PsyPost.

The participants provided the researchers with demographic information such as their age, sex, race, whether they were in a relationship, and whether they were open to dating someone outside their race. They also completed assessments of attachment anxiety, sociosexuality, the Big Five personality traits, and self-esteem. But these individual differences were largely unrelated to dating choices.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

“Also surprising is just how many things didn’t matter! At least at this initial stage, it doesn’t matter much who the person choosing is — their personality, how much they wanted short-term relationships/hook-ups — or even much about the people being chosen — how symmetric their face was, how they wore their hair,” Chopik said. “What mattered most when swiping was how attractive the people were and whether they were from the same racial/ethnic group. It really sheds a light on the types of things that go into how people choose romantic partners in these settings.”

While attractiveness and race played a major role in participants’ decisions to swipe left or right, the study only examined a small slice of the dating process.

“The studies only tested the initial phase of dating — narrowing down the number of people you could potentially date. Apps like Tinder have this initial swiping feature which results in a ‘match’ that enables two people to start talking to each other,” Chopik explained.

“But there’s so much more to dating. That conversation has to go well, people have to meet in person (and that has to go well), and more and more important relationship milestones happen after that. We only looked at the small sliver of how people choose partners on mobile dating applications. What we need to know next is what predicts success among relationships that start on these platforms?”

The study, “Modeling dating decisions in a mock swiping paradigm: An examination of participant and target characteristics“, was published February 20, 2021.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin1ShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • A computational model explains the sudden rise in societal division
  • Harsh parenting predicts teenage depression and aggression through different types of repetitive thinking
  • The surprising reason our memories become blurred as we age, according to new neuroscience research
  • Heavy ChatGPT use linked to intellectual laziness and social isolation
  • Poor emotional regulation in anxious kids is linked to greater family accommodation

Science of Money

  • Why the same risk carries different prices in different financial markets
  • The geopolitics of gold: How sanction risks are reshaping global reserves
  • How workers are actually using generative AI on the job
  • How extraordinary experiences and personality traits shape emotional brand attachment
  • What Chinese beauty influencers reveal about the limits of the Silicon Valley playbook

Recent

  • Comedy is funnier when it is easier to process, new psychology study finds
  • People with unfulfilled romantic needs form stronger attachments to fictional characters
  • Scientists build a more accurate Alzheimer’s risk score using global DNA data
  • Personality impairments link childhood maltreatment to adult anxiety
  • First human trial of psilocin since the 1960s reveals better tolerability than psilocybin
  • Watching violent online pornography is linked to poorer sexual health
  • Scientists map the brain pathway that links social isolation to increased alcohol consumption
  • Brain damage reveals how a specific region generates mind-wandering
  • Over half the risk for postpartum psychosis is tied to genetics, large study finds
  • Study reveals a double standard in how we view AI-assisted communication

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc