Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

Our eyes multi-task even when we don’t want them to, researchers find

by New York University
March 19, 2015
in Cognitive Science
Photo credit: Guillermo Salinas (Creative Commons)

Photo credit: Guillermo Salinas (Creative Commons)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Our eyes are drawn to several dimensions of an object–such as color, texture, and luminance–even when we need to focus on only one of them, researchers at New York University and the University of Pennsylvania have found. The study, which appears in the journal Current Biology, points to the ability of our visual system to integrate multiple components of an item while underscoring the difficulty we have in focusing on a particular aspect of it.

“Even when we want and need to focus on one dimension of things we come across every day, such as the texture of your cat’s fur rather than its lightness, we have difficulty doing so because our eyes want to survey several features at once,” explains Michael Landy, a professor in NYU’s Department of Psychology and the study’s senior author. “Even though its light fur can often be used to aid in recognition, if it is partially in shadow and partially in sunlight, it would be best to ignore light intensity and use another dimension, such as texture or color. But when a visual task becomes difficult, we find that humans cannot ignore a visual dimension even if it harms their performance.”

He and the study’s lead author, Toni Saarela, a visiting scholar in the University of Pennsylvania’s Department of Psychology, note that the findings point to the challenges faced by medical practitioners and airport screeners, who examine overlapping objects, through x-rays and security scanners readings, possibly outlined by different hues or brightness.

Previous studies have shown the human visual system is capable of simultaneously processing several traits of a single object. In general, this is beneficial as it allows us to combine these measurements (of brightness, hue, texture) to more efficiently identify an object. However, what if we need to spot only one aspect of an object? Are we able to block out components not relevant to our search?

Landy and Saarela’s study focused on selective attention to specific visual aspects of an object, such as its color or texture.

In a series of experiments, the researchers sought to determine under which conditions our ability to account for multiple aspects of an item aided object recognition and under which this ability served as a distraction.

In one, subjects were shown a series of single letters on a computer screen and asked if they could identify the letter. The letters were distinguished from the surrounding background in terms of color, texture, luminance (brightness) or combinations of two of these dimensions. Here, drawing upon the object’s different visual features, the experiment’s subjects successfully identified the letters, performing even better at the task when two dimensions were available (e.g., color and texture), underscoring the advantages of our visual “multi-tasking”.

However, in a second experiment, the subjects were given a slightly different identification task. This time, they were asked to identify a letter defined by one dimension, such as luminance (i.e., a bright letter on a darker background), while ignoring a second dimension (e.g., texture variations). The texture variations in the stimulus sometimes outlined the same letter, but often indicated a completely different letter. The subjects were unable to completely ignore the second dimension, reporting the texture-defined letter that they were asked to ignore as often as they reported the luminance-defined letter.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

These results, the researchers concluded, show that our ability to combine dimensions to improve object identification prevents us from ignoring a dimension when that is what our task requires.

Previous Post

New MIND diet may significantly protect against Alzheimer’s disease

Next Post

Apple of the mind’s eye: How good is our memory of everyday visual stimuli?

RELATED

Live music causes brain waves to synchronize more strongly with rhythm than recorded music
Cognitive Science

Cognition might emerge from embodied “grip” with the world rather than abstract mental processes

April 19, 2026
Women’s cognitive abilities remain stable across menstrual cycle
Cognitive Science

Men and women show different relative cognitive strengths across their lifespans

April 19, 2026
Live music causes brain waves to synchronize more strongly with rhythm than recorded music
Cognitive Science

Soft brain implants outperform rigid silicon in long-term safety study

April 18, 2026
Live music causes brain waves to synchronize more strongly with rhythm than recorded music
Cognitive Science

Live music causes brain waves to synchronize more strongly with rhythm than recorded music

April 18, 2026
How common is anal sex? Scientific facts about prevalence, pain, pleasure, and more
Cognitive Science

Higher intelligence in adolescence linked to lower mental illness risk in adulthood

April 17, 2026
Sorting Hat research: What does your Hogwarts house say about your psychological makeup?
Cognitive Science

Maturing brain pathways explain the sudden leap in children’s language skills

April 17, 2026
Republican lawmakers lead the trend of using insults to chase media attention instead of policy wins
Business

Children with obesity face a steep decline in adult economic mobility

April 16, 2026
Study reveals lasting impact of compassion training on moral expansiveness
Meditation

A daily mindfulness habit can improve your memory for future plans

April 15, 2026

STAY CONNECTED

RSS Psychology of Selling

  • Why personalized ads sometimes backfire: A research review explains when tailoring messages works and when it doesn’t
  • The common advice to avoid high customer expectations may not be backed by evidence
  • Personality-matched persuasion works better, but mismatched messages can backfire
  • When happy customers and happy employees don’t add up: How investor signals have shifted in the social media age
  • Correcting fake news about brands does not backfire, five-study experiment finds

LATEST

People remain “blissfully ignorant” of AI use in everyday messages, new research shows

Believing in a “chemical imbalance” might keep patients on antidepressants longer

Can a common parasite medication calm the brain’s stress circuitry during alcohol withdrawal?

Childhood trauma and attachment styles show nuanced links to alternative sexual preferences

New study reveals how political bias conditions the impact of conspiracy thinking

Cognition might emerge from embodied “grip” with the world rather than abstract mental processes

Men and women show different relative cognitive strengths across their lifespans

Early exposure to forever chemicals linked to altered brain genes and impulsive behavior in rats

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc