Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Perceived publication pressure is linked to intentions to engage in future scientific misconduct

by Mane Kara-Yakoubian
November 10, 2021
in Social Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Don't miss out! Follow PsyPost on Bluesky!

A series of two studies published in Research Ethics have found that most scholars believe themselves to be moral and predict they will continue behaving morally, that scientific misconduct is frequently noticed by both researchers and their managers, and that perceived publication pressure and willingness to engage in future scientific misconduct are positively correlated.

Academics face the pressure to either “publish or perish” in their research endeavors, leading to a publication culture that is not perceived positively. Some existing evidence suggests that the added psychological stress of publication pressure can result in diminished ethical decision making and engagement in scientific misconduct. This could include fabrication, falsification, or even plagiarism – sometimes termed sloppy science or questionable research practices.

Scientific misconduct can manifest as selective reporting, the intentional deletion of data points, selective citing, salami slicing (i.e., splitting the data of a single project into multiple publishable slices), guest authorships, and flawed quality assurance or mentoring.

“I decided to study this topic as I noticed the unethical behaviors of other researchers and wondered whether the so-called publication pressure is related to their behaviors,” explained study author Mariola Paruzel-Czachura, a moral psychologist at the University of Silesia. “Studying this topic is highly relevant to research integrity and more generally, for the quality of research. Moreover, past research suggests that this relationship is possible.”

In Study 1, 423 researchers from a large Polish University were recruited from varying disciplines, including the humanities, exact sciences, and social sciences. Participants responded to 13 questions relating to their perceived publication pressure and publication ethics. In Study 2, the study authors recruited 31 researchers who were part of university management. For these individuals, the survey questions were rephrased to reflect their observations of subordinates.

“Researchers have stressful jobs, and that stress may be related to their unethical behaviors,” Paruzel-Czachura told PsyPost. “It is not so bad, as most researchers are ethical, and they do not engage in highly unethical behaviors, such as inventing data. However, many researchers observe – among others – so-called questionable research practices. Such as, adding a colleague as a co-author to an article, without any contribution from them to the research.”

While only 3% of participants reported having engaged in scientific misconduct in the past, 51% reported noticing a colleague violating ethical standards. The greater participants’ perceived publication pressure was, the greater their intentions were to engage in dishonest scientific practices in the future. Satisfaction with the current system of accumulating points was not related to past scientific misconduct, or intentions to engage in future dishonest practices. Lastly, scholars who observed strong publication pressure in their colleagues were also more likely to notice the unethical scientific practices of others. These findings suggest that researchers today no longer face the dilemma to publish or perish, but instead, to publish or be ethical.

With regard to study limitations, Paruzel-Czachura noted, “First, the study was conducted in one country, so it is hard to generalize the results. Second, we used self-description surveys, so we cannot determine if the gathered data and statistics are accurate. However, we already know that people usually show their morality in a better light, so we may expect our statistics to be understated.”

“As well, these studies were conducted in Poland, where we have an average level of stress in research. Compared to the United States, we have more stable jobs here at the beginning of our careers, and we are not so stressed about publications like in countries where if you do not publish, you will lose your job in a few months. For example, we have more extended contracts. Other researchers also point out this problem – that we have different educational and research systems, and different levels of stress in research. Future studies should control this issue.”

These findings provide the groundwork for future research questions.

“We still need to prevent questionable research practices and learn how individual differences among researchers may be related to unethical behavior. I also think that culture may play a role here. For example, in our study, we found that honorary co-authorship was Poland’s most popular ethical misconduct. I think this may be related to high levels of loyalty and authority in our culture, and future studies could examine how culture impacts scientific misconduct.”

The study, “Publish or be ethical? Publishing pressure and scientific misconduct in research”, was authored by Mariola Paruzel-Czachura, Lidia Baran and Zbigniew Spendel.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Researchers identify neural mechanism behind memory prioritization
Social Psychology

People who are more likely to die seem to care less about the future

June 30, 2025

Individuals with higher mortality risk—as judged by actuarial life insurance data—tend to care less about long-term consequences. They show more impulsivity and less future planning, consistent with evolutionary theories that link time horizon to environmental and internal health cues.

Read moreDetails
Scientists show how you’re unknowingly sealing yourself in an information bubble
Cognitive Science

Scientists show how you’re unknowingly sealing yourself in an information bubble

June 29, 2025

Scientists have found that belief polarization doesn’t always come from misinformation or social media bubbles. Instead, it often begins with a simple search. Our choice of words—and the algorithm’s response—can subtly seal us inside our own informational comfort zones.

Read moreDetails
Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds
Political Psychology

Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds

June 28, 2025

A new study finds that voters are more motivated by radical political leaders than moderates, because supporting bold causes makes them feel personally significant—driving greater activism, sacrifice, and long-term engagement across elections in the United States and Poland.

Read moreDetails
Openness to sugar relationships tied to short-term mating, not life history strategy
Evolutionary Psychology

Openness to sugar relationships tied to short-term mating, not life history strategy

June 28, 2025

Sugar relationships may be more about sexual attitudes than survival strategies. A new study shows people drawn to these arrangements tend to favor short-term mating, while early-life unpredictability plays only a small role—especially for men.

Read moreDetails
New psychology research uncovers surprisingly consistent misjudgments of tattooed individuals
Social Psychology

New psychology research uncovers surprisingly consistent misjudgments of tattooed individuals

June 28, 2025

New research finds that while people often agree on what a tattoo says about someone’s personality, those judgments are usually wrong. The study reveals a consistent gap between how tattoos are perceived and the actual personalities of their wearers.

Read moreDetails
Sexual satisfaction’s link to marital happiness grows stronger with age
Relationships and Sexual Health

Similarity in long‑term romantic couples probably matters less than we think

June 27, 2025

Despite common belief that couples must be alike, a review of 339 studies finds little evidence that actual similarity predicts lasting relationship satisfaction.

Read moreDetails
TikTok tics study sheds light on recovery trends and ongoing mental health challenges
Body Image and Body Dysmorphia

TikTok and similar platforms linked to body dissatisfaction and eating disorder symptoms

June 27, 2025

Frequent use of platforms like TikTok and YouTube Shorts is linked to disordered eating symptoms among teens, according to new research. The study found that body comparisons and dissatisfaction may help explain this troubling association—especially among girls.

Read moreDetails
How people end romantic relationships: New study pinpoints three common break up strategies
Narcissism

Support for war is associated with narcissistic personality traits

June 26, 2025

Researchers have uncovered a link between narcissistic traits and attitudes toward war and peace.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

New study reveals how MDMA rewires serotonin and oxytocin systems in the brain

Ghosting and ‘breadcrumbing’: the psychological impact of our bad behaviour on dating apps

Older adults who feel criticized by loved ones are more likely to develop depression

New study exposes gap between ADHD drug use and safety research in children

People who are more likely to die seem to care less about the future

Researchers identify neural mechanism behind memory prioritization

Love addiction linked to memory and attention problems

Positive early experiences may buffer suicidal thoughts in those with trauma symptoms, new study finds

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy