Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Perceived publication pressure is linked to intentions to engage in future scientific misconduct

by Mane Kara-Yakoubian
November 10, 2021
in Social Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay informed on the latest psychology and neuroscience research—follow PsyPost on LinkedIn for daily updates and insights.

A series of two studies published in Research Ethics have found that most scholars believe themselves to be moral and predict they will continue behaving morally, that scientific misconduct is frequently noticed by both researchers and their managers, and that perceived publication pressure and willingness to engage in future scientific misconduct are positively correlated.

Academics face the pressure to either “publish or perish” in their research endeavors, leading to a publication culture that is not perceived positively. Some existing evidence suggests that the added psychological stress of publication pressure can result in diminished ethical decision making and engagement in scientific misconduct. This could include fabrication, falsification, or even plagiarism – sometimes termed sloppy science or questionable research practices.

Scientific misconduct can manifest as selective reporting, the intentional deletion of data points, selective citing, salami slicing (i.e., splitting the data of a single project into multiple publishable slices), guest authorships, and flawed quality assurance or mentoring.

“I decided to study this topic as I noticed the unethical behaviors of other researchers and wondered whether the so-called publication pressure is related to their behaviors,” explained study author Mariola Paruzel-Czachura, a moral psychologist at the University of Silesia. “Studying this topic is highly relevant to research integrity and more generally, for the quality of research. Moreover, past research suggests that this relationship is possible.”

In Study 1, 423 researchers from a large Polish University were recruited from varying disciplines, including the humanities, exact sciences, and social sciences. Participants responded to 13 questions relating to their perceived publication pressure and publication ethics. In Study 2, the study authors recruited 31 researchers who were part of university management. For these individuals, the survey questions were rephrased to reflect their observations of subordinates.

“Researchers have stressful jobs, and that stress may be related to their unethical behaviors,” Paruzel-Czachura told PsyPost. “It is not so bad, as most researchers are ethical, and they do not engage in highly unethical behaviors, such as inventing data. However, many researchers observe – among others – so-called questionable research practices. Such as, adding a colleague as a co-author to an article, without any contribution from them to the research.”

While only 3% of participants reported having engaged in scientific misconduct in the past, 51% reported noticing a colleague violating ethical standards. The greater participants’ perceived publication pressure was, the greater their intentions were to engage in dishonest scientific practices in the future. Satisfaction with the current system of accumulating points was not related to past scientific misconduct, or intentions to engage in future dishonest practices. Lastly, scholars who observed strong publication pressure in their colleagues were also more likely to notice the unethical scientific practices of others. These findings suggest that researchers today no longer face the dilemma to publish or perish, but instead, to publish or be ethical.

With regard to study limitations, Paruzel-Czachura noted, “First, the study was conducted in one country, so it is hard to generalize the results. Second, we used self-description surveys, so we cannot determine if the gathered data and statistics are accurate. However, we already know that people usually show their morality in a better light, so we may expect our statistics to be understated.”

“As well, these studies were conducted in Poland, where we have an average level of stress in research. Compared to the United States, we have more stable jobs here at the beginning of our careers, and we are not so stressed about publications like in countries where if you do not publish, you will lose your job in a few months. For example, we have more extended contracts. Other researchers also point out this problem – that we have different educational and research systems, and different levels of stress in research. Future studies should control this issue.”

These findings provide the groundwork for future research questions.

“We still need to prevent questionable research practices and learn how individual differences among researchers may be related to unethical behavior. I also think that culture may play a role here. For example, in our study, we found that honorary co-authorship was Poland’s most popular ethical misconduct. I think this may be related to high levels of loyalty and authority in our culture, and future studies could examine how culture impacts scientific misconduct.”

The study, “Publish or be ethical? Publishing pressure and scientific misconduct in research”, was authored by Mariola Paruzel-Czachura, Lidia Baran and Zbigniew Spendel.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

New research sheds light on the relationship between dark personality traits and political participation
Dark Triad

How are dark triad traits associated with emotional functioning?

June 3, 2025

A recent study found that psychopathy and narcissism are linked to distinct emotional deficits. Psychopathy impairs emotional reactivity and recognition, while narcissism is tied to inflated emotional self-perception but poor detection of others’ distress.

Read moreDetails
Narcissistic leadership in Hitler, Putin, and Trump shares common roots, new psychology paper claims
Donald Trump

Narcissistic leadership in Hitler, Putin, and Trump shares common roots, new psychology paper claims

June 2, 2025

Narcissism in political leaders may have roots in childhood. A recent study explores how Hitler, Putin, and Trump experienced similar emotional trauma and parenting styles that contributed to unhealthy narcissistic development and shaped their political personas.

Read moreDetails
Authoritarianism in parents may hinder a key cognitive skill in their children
Narcissism

Extraversion, narcissism, and histrionic tendencies predict the desire to become an influencer

June 2, 2025

Teens who score higher in extraversion, narcissism, and dramatic emotional expression are more likely to want to be influencers, according to a new study. The findings suggest that personality shapes how young people see their future in the digital age.

Read moreDetails
Authoritarianism in parents may hinder a key cognitive skill in their children
Political Psychology

New research sheds light on growing support for Black candidates among white Democrats

June 2, 2025

New research shows that white Democrats are increasingly choosing Black candidates over white ones in hypothetical elections. The change reflects a broader shift in racial attitudes, especially among those concerned about discrimination and opposed to Donald Trump’s rhetoric.

Read moreDetails
Authoritarianism in parents may hinder a key cognitive skill in their children
Authoritarianism

Authoritarianism in parents may hinder a key cognitive skill in their children

June 2, 2025

A new study suggests that mothers who favor social hierarchies and obedience to authority use less perspective-taking language with their children—especially when discussing people from different ethnic backgrounds. Their children also show weaker ability to understand others’ thoughts and feelings.

Read moreDetails
New psychology research: Feeling politically excluded heightens antisocial tendencies
Political Psychology

New psychology research: Feeling politically excluded heightens antisocial tendencies

June 1, 2025

Being left out by political allies or rivals makes people feel less accepted and more inclined to lash out at opponents, new research shows. The emotional toll of political exclusion could be a key driver of deepening polarization in the United States.

Read moreDetails
Here’s what the data says about who actually benefits from DEI
Business

Here’s what the data says about who actually benefits from DEI

May 31, 2025

What’s the actual impact of diversity, equity, and inclusion? A sociologist unpacks decades of research showing how DEI programs affect businesses, education, and the broader economy—highlighting who benefits, who doesn’t, and what the data really says.

Read moreDetails
Sheriff partisanship doesn’t appear to shape extremist violence in the United States
Political Psychology

Sheriff partisanship doesn’t appear to shape extremist violence in the United States

May 30, 2025

New research shows that partisan sheriffs in the United States, unlike local officials in some Global South countries, do not influence the prevalence of political violence, pointing to possible institutional differences across global democratic contexts.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Neuroscientists discover brain rhythms slow down during sleep in two distinct ways

DNA methylation may explain how childhood adversity shapes depression risk

How are dark triad traits associated with emotional functioning?

Sleep problems tied to loneliness via two psychological pathways, studies suggest

Whole-body movement play shows promise for children with autism

ChatGPT mimics human cognitive dissonance in psychological experiments, study finds

Narcissistic leadership in Hitler, Putin, and Trump shares common roots, new psychology paper claims

The ‘entourage effect’ — what we don’t know about how cannabis works

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy