PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Relationships and Sexual Health Infidelity

Personality shapes mate-poaching tactics, according to new study on the psychology of partner stealing

by Eric W. Dolan
February 21, 2025
Reading Time: 4 mins read
(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

New research published in Evolutionary Psychological Science suggests that a person’s personality can influence the way they attempt to attract someone who is already in a relationship. The study found that individuals who are naturally inclined to be dominant are more likely to use forceful or intrusive tactics when trying to “poach” a partner, while those who are more prestige-oriented tend to employ gentler, more appealing approaches.

The motivation behind this study, conducted by Kyle E. Conlon, stemmed from a gap in our understanding of mate poaching, which refers to the act of trying to attract someone away from their current romantic partner. While previous research has explored how personality affects general mate attraction and relationship maintenance, less attention has been paid to how specific personality traits relate to the tactics people use when attempting to lure someone away from an existing relationship.

“I’ve long been interested in mating psychology, but from a scientific perspective, mate poaching is especially fascinating,” explained Conlon, a psychology professor at Stephen F. Austin State University. “Poaching a desired mate who is already in an existing exclusive relationship is both complex and risky. It requires an astute social savvy to effectively lure someone away from their current partner without raising the mated partner’s suspicion. There are advantages, but there are also substantial downsides to getting caught.”

For this study, Conlon recruited a large group of participants from a university in East Texas. A total of 559 undergraduate students participated in the study, the majority of whom identified as heterosexual. The participants, mostly women, with an average age of 19, were primarily White and non-Hispanic. Each student completed a series of questionnaires online.

First, to measure dominance and prestige orientation, participants filled out the Dominance-Prestige Scales. This questionnaire included seventeen statements designed to assess how dominant and prestige-oriented individuals perceived themselves to be. For example, to measure dominance orientation, participants rated their agreement with statements like “I enjoy having control over others” and “Others know it is better to let me have my way.” To measure prestige orientation, they responded to statements such as “I am held in high esteem by those I know” and “Others seek my advice on a variety of matters.”

Next, participants completed the Anonymous Romantic Attraction Survey. This survey was designed to assess their past experiences with mate poaching, both as someone attempting to poach and as someone being targeted for poaching. The survey asked participants to indicate how often they had tried to attract someone already in a relationship, both for a short-term sexual relationship and for a long-term relationship. They also rated how successful they were in these attempts.

Similarly, the survey asked about their experiences being the target of mate poaching attempts while they were in a relationship, again for both short-term and long-term intentions, and how successful those attempts were. The survey also collected information on their current relationship status and satisfaction.

Finally, to get a detailed understanding of the specific tactics used in mate poaching, participants completed a mate poaching enticement scale. This scale listed 51 different actions that people might use to try to attract someone in a relationship, categorized into 20 different types of tactics. For each action, participants indicated how frequently they had performed it in the past to attract someone who was already romantically involved, using a scale of “never performed this act” to “performed this act more than twice.”

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

After analyzing the data collected from these questionnaires, Conlon found that individuals who scored high in dominance orientation reported more attempts at mate poaching and they also reported greater success in these attempts. Furthermore, they were more likely to report being targeted for mate poaching themselves.

When examining specific mate poaching tactics, dominance orientation showed a positive association with a wide range of tactics, including both seemingly positive ones like “using humor” and “demonstrating resources,” as well as more negative or forceful tactics. Notably, dominance orientation was strongly associated with tactics like “derogating one’s current partner,” “inviting meddling into the relationship,” and “occupying the mate’s time.”

Prestige orientation presented a different picture. It was not significantly related to how often people attempted or succeeded at mate poaching. However, individuals with high prestige orientation did report being targeted for mate poaching, but interestingly, they were less likely to be successfully poached. This suggests that while they were seen as desirable targets, they were also more resistant to being lured away.

Regarding specific tactics, prestige orientation was positively associated with more prosocial tactics like “being generous” and “using humor.” In contrast to dominance orientation, prestige orientation was negatively associated with using the tactic of “getting the mate drunk.”

“I found it interesting that dominance-oriented individuals tried a lot of different strategies, whereas prestige-oriented individuals were seemingly more selective in the strategies they used,” Conlon told PsyPost.

In terms of gender differences, men in the study reported being more dominance-oriented than women. Men were also more likely to report having attempted to poach both short-term and long-term partners and indicated they were more often successfully poached as short-term partners themselves. Looking at specific poaching tactics, men reported more frequently using tactics like “occupying the desired partner’s time,” “waiting around,” and “derogating their current partner” compared to women.

“This work suggests that individuals may adopt mate poaching strategies in line with their self-perceived dominance and prestige,” Conlon explained. “Whereas dominant people may poach by saying negative things about someone’s partner or by trying to interfere directly with the relationship, people high in prestige take a different approach. Instead, prestigious people attempt to be funny, kind, and generous – in short, they leverage their prestige to attract away a currently mated partner.”

But as with all research, there are limitations to consider. Firstly, the study relied on self-reported measures of dominance, prestige, and mate poaching behaviors, which could be influenced by social desirability bias or inaccuracies in self-perception. Participants might have underreported socially undesirable behaviors like mate poaching, or they might not accurately assess their own levels of dominance and prestige. Secondly, the sample consisted primarily of young undergraduate students, which could limit the generalizability of the findings.

Looking ahead, future research should build on these findings by including a more diverse sample and by considering additional factors that might play a role in mate poaching. One promising direction is to examine how these self-perceptions of dominance and prestige relate to other personality traits.

“I think it would be interesting to see how these variables relate to other individual differences such as the Dark Triad traits,” Conlon said.

The study, “You Stole My Heart: Mate Poaching Tactics of Dominance- and Prestige-Oriented Individuals,” was published February 5, 2025.

RELATED

Authoritarian attitudes are linked to MAGA support—except among women of color, researchers find
Political Psychology

Trump’s 2024 victory flipped the psychological differences between liberals and conservatives

April 29, 2026
High meat consumption may protect against cognitive decline in people with a specific Alzheimer’s gene
Narcissism

Narcissism runs in the family, but not because of parenting

April 28, 2026
A simple “blank screen” test revealed a key fact about the psychology of neuroticism
Evolutionary Psychology

What computer simulations reveal about the evolutionary purpose of gaming

April 28, 2026
Artificial intelligence flatters users into bad behavior
Moral Psychology

Young men use moral outrage to claim status in political debates

April 26, 2026
Artificial intelligence flatters users into bad behavior
Political Psychology

Public support for transgender women in sports dropped significantly between 2019 and 2024

April 26, 2026
Self-interest, not spontaneous generosity, drives equality among Hadza hunter-gatherers
Divorce

Fathers who fear divorce are more likely to develop distrust in political institutions

April 26, 2026
People view the term “sex worker” much more positively than “prostitute” or “hooker”
Relationships and Sexual Health

People view the term “sex worker” much more positively than “prostitute” or “hooker”

April 25, 2026
New study identifies another key difference between religious “nones” and religious “dones”
Political Psychology

Former Christians express more progressive political views than lifelong nonbelievers

April 25, 2026

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader. We also syndicate to Apple News.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Narcissism runs in the family, but not because of parenting
  • How cognitive ability and logical intuition evolve during middle and high school
  • Former Christians express more progressive political views than lifelong nonbelievers
  • New psychology research reveals your face might determine how easily people remember your name
  • Certainty in your feelings toward your partner predicts relationship happiness and mental well-being

Psychology of Selling

  • Seven seller skills that drive B2B sales performance, according to a Norwegian study
  • What makes customers stick with a salesperson? A study traces the path from trust to long-term commitment
  • When company shakeups breed envy, salespeople may cut corners and eye the exit
  • Study finds Instagram micro-celebrities can shift brand attitudes and buying intent through direct engagement
  • Salespeople who feel they’re making a difference may outperform those chasing commissions

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc