Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Relationships and Sexual Health

“Phone snubbing” your partner can lead to a vicious cycle of resentment and retaliation, study suggests

by Emily Manis
October 7, 2022
in Relationships and Sexual Health, Social Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Smartphones have become an integral part of daily life. They are often thought of as a positive tool used to increase communication, but they can also be detrimental to relationships by drawing attention away from one’s partner. A study published in Computers in Human Behavior explores how “phubbing,” or phone snubbing, can negatively impact relationship satisfaction, and cause the partner who feels snubbed to retaliate.

The rise of technology has brought many significant challenges along with its plethora of advancements. Communication has been streamlined but also depersonalized by the popularity of smartphones and social media apps. This can harm in-person communication, especially when one person is perceiving that their partner is ignoring them for or being distracted by their cellphone while they are together.

This phenomenon is called “phubbing” and has been shown to be linked to negative relationship and personal outcomes. The new study sought to better understand the effect phubbing has on the partner who feels they are being phubbed, as well as how the phubbed partner responds behaviorally.

In their study, Tessa Thejas Thomas and colleagues utilized a sample of 75 participants recruited through social media and word of mouth to serve as their sample. All participants were required to be in a romantic relationship of 6 months or longer and living with their significant other. The sample was predominantly female and heterosexual.

All participants were asked to complete ten daily diaries, with measures including demographics, daily perceived phubbing, daily relationship satisfaction, daily self-esteem, daily depressed/anxious mood, daily anger/frustration, daily responses to being phubbed, and daily motivations for retaliation.

Results showed that partners who felt they were being phubbed in their relationships had lower levels of wellbeing, were less satisfied with their relationship, and reported more feelings of anger, jealousy, and frustration. Despite this, feeling phubbed by a partner did not lead to lower self-esteems or higher rates of anxiety and depression, with the exception of phubbing being correlated with depression in couples who have been married over 7 years.

Results also showed that phubbing was related to curiosity and resentment in the partner who felt ignored. When participants felt phubbed, they were more likely to pick up their own phones to engage in retaliatory behavior. This was motivated most strongly by boredom, rather than revenge, although there was no significant relationship.

“Although there may be various motivators for retaliatory phubbing, findings suggest partner phubbing operates as a vicious cycle,” the researchers wrote. “This may explain why, over time, phubbing is associated with several negative outcomes (i.e., relationship dissatisfaction, increased anger, resentment and tit-for-tat retaliation).”

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

“It is important to note, however, that several outcomes of perceived partner phubbing were not detrimental to the phubbee. There was no significant effect on phubbees’ personal well-being. Similarly, some individuals responded to partner phubbing by simply asking their partner what they were looking at. By doing so, they may have mitigated any conflict from occurring.”

This study made significant progress with better understanding the relatively new concept of phubbing as its relational effects. Despite this, there are limitations to note. One such limitation is that all measures were self-report, which can cause bias in answers and does not allow us to extrapolate causation from results. Additionally, only the partner feeling phubbed in the relationship answered questions; future research could focus on the perceptions and effects on both partners.

The study, “Phubbing in romantic relationships and retaliation: A daily diary study“, was authored by Tessa Thejas Thomas, Katherine B. Carnelley, and Claire M. Hart.

RELATED

A new experiment reveals an unexpected shift in how pregnant women handle intimidation
Evolutionary Psychology

A new experiment reveals an unexpected shift in how pregnant women handle intimidation

February 5, 2026
Trump’s election fraud allegations linked to temporary decline in voter turnout
Business

Trump-related search activity signals a surprising trend in the stock market

February 5, 2026
One specific reason for having sex is associated with higher stress levels the next day
Divorce

New study highlights distinct divorce patterns between same-sex and opposite-sex couples

February 4, 2026
One specific reason for having sex is associated with higher stress levels the next day
Relationships and Sexual Health

One specific reason for having sex is associated with higher stress levels the next day

February 4, 2026
Watching alone or together? How different pornography habits are linked to romantic partners’ bond
Relationships and Sexual Health

Shared viewing of erotic webcams is rare but may enhance relationship intimacy

February 3, 2026
Social media may be trapping us in a cycle of loneliness, new study suggests
Addiction

The hidden role of vulnerable dark personality traits in digital addiction

February 3, 2026
New research exposes an alarming trend in rates of suicide among Black women
Racism and Discrimination

Half of the racial mortality gap is explained by stress and inflammation

February 2, 2026
Dark personality traits flourish in these specific environments, huge new study reveals
Relationships and Sexual Health

For romantic satisfaction, quantity of affection beats similarity

February 2, 2026

PsyPost Merch

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Eye contact discomfort does not explain slower emotion recognition in autistic individuals

A high-sugar breakfast may trigger a “rest and digest” state that dampens cognitive focus

Neuroscientists reveal how jazz improvisation shifts brain activity

A new experiment reveals an unexpected shift in how pregnant women handle intimidation

Trump-related search activity signals a surprising trend in the stock market

A new mouse model links cleared viral infections to ALS-like symptoms

New study highlights distinct divorce patterns between same-sex and opposite-sex couples

Psilocybin impacts immunity and behavior differently depending on diet and exercise context

RSS Psychology of Selling

  • Sales agents often stay for autonomy rather than financial rewards
  • The economics of emotion: Reassessing the link between happiness and spending
  • Surprising link found between greed and poor work results among salespeople
  • Intrinsic motivation drives sales performance better than financial rewards
  • New research links faking emotions to higher turnover in B2B sales
         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy