A new study reports a potential neurological link between adverse experiences in childhood and the negative thinking patterns characteristic of mood disorders. Researchers found that a specific signature of spontaneous brain activity appears to act as an intermediary, connecting early life adversity with an adult’s belief that they cannot control negative events. The work was published in the journal Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.
Individuals living with depression or bipolar disorder often experience what are known as negative cognitive styles. These are persistent patterns of pessimistic thought, such as a tendency to view oneself and the world negatively, a feeling of hopelessness that bad situations will never improve, or a sense of being powerless. These thought patterns can persist even when symptoms of the mood disorder have subsided, suggesting they are a deep-seated characteristic.
Past research has established a strong connection between these cognitive styles and a person’s exposure to adverse childhood experiences. Such experiences can include various forms of abuse or neglect, as well as significant family dysfunction. These stressful events are known risk factors for developing mood disorders in adulthood and are often associated with more severe forms of illness. Scientists have sought to understand the biological mechanisms that connect these early life events to adult psychological symptoms.
A team of researchers from the Vita-Salute San Raffaele University and the IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele in Milan, Italy, proposed that the bridge between childhood adversity and adult cognitive styles might be found in the brain’s baseline activity. They focused on a measure of spontaneous neural activity, which reflects how the brain functions when it is at rest and not engaged in a specific task. They hypothesized that childhood adversity could alter these fundamental patterns of brain function, and that these alterations would in turn be related to negative thinking styles.
To investigate this, the researchers recruited 94 inpatients who were being treated for a depressive episode, including 48 with major depressive disorder and 46 with bipolar disorder. They also recruited a comparison group of 35 healthy individuals with no history of major psychiatric disorders. All participants completed the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, a self-report measure that assesses five types of adversity: emotional abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional neglect, and physical neglect.
A subset of 71 patients also completed the Cognitions Questionnaire, which measures different facets of negative thinking, such as the perceived uncontrollability of events and the tendency to assume negative outcomes will persist over time.
Each participant also underwent a brain scan using functional magnetic resonance imaging, or fMRI. The scans were performed while the participants were at rest with their eyes closed, allowing the researchers to measure spontaneous brain activity. From these scans, they calculated a specific metric known as the fractional Amplitude of Low Frequency Fluctuations. This measurement reflects the intensity of slow, spontaneous brain signals in localized regions, offering a window into the brain’s baseline functional state.
The researchers then employed a statistical technique called Canonical Correlation Analysis to identify relationships between the complex datasets. This method is designed to find the strongest possible link between one set of variables, in this case the five types of childhood adversity, and another set of variables, which was the spontaneous activity in 246 distinct brain regions. This approach allowed the team to see if a particular pattern of childhood experiences was associated with a corresponding pattern of brain activity.
In the group of patients with mood disorders, the analysis identified a significant relationship. A pattern of childhood adversity, with emotional neglect contributing most strongly, was linked to a distinct signature of spontaneous brain activity.
This signature involved increased activity in several brain regions, including the bilateral precuneus, the posterior cingulate gyrus, and the left dorsolateral insula. At the same time, this pattern involved decreased activity in the right superior temporal gyrus. No such significant association was found in the healthy control group.
The team then examined whether this brain activity pattern was related to the patients’ negative thinking styles. They found that it was. The signature of brain activity linked to childhood adversity also predicted patients’ scores on two specific types of negative thinking: the tendency to generalize negative events across time, which is a form of hopelessness, and the belief that one is unable to control negative events.
Finally, the researchers performed a mediation analysis to test their central hypothesis. This analysis assesses whether the relationship between two variables, here childhood adversity and negative thinking, can be explained by a third, intermediate variable, which was the brain activity pattern.
For the cognitive style of perceived uncontrollability, the model showed a total mediation. This result suggests that the observed association between childhood adversity and a feeling of powerlessness in adulthood is accounted for by the identified changes in spontaneous brain activity.
The study has some limitations. The research is correlational, so it can identify associations but cannot prove that childhood adversity causes the changes in brain activity. The assessment of childhood experiences also relied on adults’ retrospective self-reports, which can be subject to memory biases. Additionally, the sample size was relatively modest, which may have limited the statistical power to detect more subtle or diagnosis-specific effects.
Future research could build on these findings by using larger sample sizes to confirm the results and explore potential differences between major depression and bipolar disorder. Longer brain scans could also provide more reliable measurements of spontaneous neural activity. Incorporating other neurobiological markers, such as measures of brain connectivity, might offer a more comprehensive understanding of how early life stress becomes embedded in brain function and contributes to the cognitive symptoms of mood disorders.
The study, “Spontaneous neural activity mediates the effect of adverse childhood experiences on negative cognitive styles in mood disorders: a multivariate approach,” was authored by Tommaso Cazzella, Michele Acconcia, Federica Colombo, Federico Calesella, Lidia Fortaner-Uyà, Camilla Monopoli, Greta D’Orsi, Bianca Maria Benatti, Sara Poletti, Raffaella Zanardi, Cristina Colombo, Francesco Benedetti, and Benedetta Vai.