Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

Scientists observe surprising link between mindset and vaccine outcomes

'What you believe about a vaccine before getting it might shape your reaction to it'

by Eric W. Dolan
April 4, 2025
in Cognitive Science, COVID-19
[Adobe Stock]

[Adobe Stock]

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

New research published in Brain, Behavior, & Immunity – Health suggests that how people think about the COVID-19 vaccine might shape their experience—both psychologically and biologically. Individuals with a more positive mindset about the vaccine reported fewer side effects, less anxiety on the day of vaccination, and greater happiness in the days that followed. One specific belief—that side effects signal the vaccine is working—was linked with stronger immune responses, as measured by neutralizing antibody levels, even months after vaccination.

“We were interested in this topic because there’s increasing evidence that how people think about health interventions—like vaccines—can influence how they experience them,” explained study author Darwin A. Guevarra, an assistant professor of psychology at Miami University.

“Given the global rollout of COVID-19 vaccines and the variability in people’s reactions, we wanted to know whether psychological factors, like mindsets, might help explain differences in both biological and emotional responses.”

“This study adds to growing evidence that our minds and bodies are deeply connected. Even small shifts in mindset—how we frame what we’re experiencing—can potentially make a big difference in how we respond to medical interventions. That’s both exciting and empowering.”

The researchers conducted a prospective study involving 534 healthy adults in the San Francisco Bay Area. These participants had not yet been infected with COVID-19 and had not received a vaccine at the start of the study. They were enrolled between March and April 2021, just as vaccination campaigns were expanding. Each participant received one of three vaccines—Johnson & Johnson, Moderna, or Pfizer—and was tracked over time to see how their beliefs about the vaccine related to their biological and emotional responses.

Participants answered surveys about their beliefs and feelings on the day of their vaccination and in the days afterward. These surveys assessed general optimism, anxiety, and emotional well-being, as well as more specific beliefs, such as whether they thought the vaccine would protect them, whether they believed their body would respond well, and whether they saw side effects as a sign the vaccine was working.

Blood samples were collected at three time points: before vaccination, about one month after, and again at six months. These blood samples were analyzed to measure levels of neutralizing antibodies—proteins the body produces to fight the virus.

When researchers analyzed the data, they found that participants who had a more positive overall mindset about the vaccine reported fewer side effects and less anxiety on the day they were vaccinated. They also reported feeling less stressed and sad, and more joyful in the days that followed. These effects were strongest on the day of vaccination and gradually declined over the next five days.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

Importantly, these results remained even after accounting for other factors like general optimism, suggesting that specific beliefs about the vaccine played a unique role.

In more targeted analyses, the researchers found that people who believed their body would respond well to the vaccine or who believed the vaccine would protect them also tended to experience fewer side effects and less anxiety. They also reported better emotional outcomes.

Interestingly, however, these specific beliefs did not predict a stronger antibody response. The only belief that did was the mindset that side effects are a sign the vaccine is working. People who held this belief had higher neutralizing antibody levels at both the one-month and six-month follow-ups, suggesting a possible link between this specific expectation and the body’s immune response.

“What you believe about a vaccine before getting it might shape your reaction to it,” Guevarra told PsyPost. “People with a more positive mindset about the vaccine––such as believing it would work or that their body would respond well––reported fewer side effects, less anxiety, and better mood after vaccination. In some cases, specific beliefs, such as viewing side effects as a sign that the vaccine is working, were even linked to stronger antibody responses.”

This pattern raises the possibility that interpreting side effects as a positive sign could alter how the body reacts at a biological level. While the exact mechanisms remain unclear, one explanation is that this mindset reduces stress responses, which have been shown in previous studies to influence immune functioning. Another possibility is that the belief encourages greater engagement with the experience—people may be more likely to rest, hydrate, or otherwise care for themselves if they see symptoms as meaningful rather than threatening.

But the study, like all research, has limitations to consider. While the study design was prospective—meaning beliefs were measured before outcomes—it was not an experimental study. This means that the researchers cannot say for sure that mindsets caused the observed effects. It’s possible that other unmeasured factors played a role.

“Also, our sample generally had very positive vaccine mindsets to begin with, which might limit the range of effects we could observe,” Guevarra noted. “We need more research in groups with more varied beliefs about vaccination.”

Despite these caveats, the findings align with a growing body of research showing that how people think about treatments can influence how effective those treatments feel—and even how the body responds. Studies of non-deceptive placebos, for example, have shown that people can experience real emotional and physical benefits even when they know they are not receiving an active drug.

In one such study published in Nature Communications, people who were told a saline nasal spray was a placebo still experienced less emotional distress when shown upsetting images, and brain scans confirmed changes in neural markers of distress.

“Many people might find these results surprising, but they actually align with what we already know from decades of research,” Guevarra explained. “The brain communicates with every major physiological system, including the immune system. Studies in placebo science and psychoneuroimmunology have shown that our beliefs and expectations can influence how our bodies respond to illness and treatment. What’s new here is applying that framework to vaccine response—an area that hasn’t been thoroughly studied before. More work is needed to replicate these findings and uncover the biological pathways involved.”

The implications are wide-ranging. If mindset interventions can reliably improve how people experience vaccination, they could be used to ease fear, reduce side effects, and even boost immunity.

“Our goal is to better understand how mindset interventions could be used alongside medical treatments to improve health outcomes,” Guevarra told PsyPost. “If we can identify simple, scalable ways to shift people’s beliefs—like short videos or messages delivered before treatment—we might be able to reduce side effects, improve emotional well-being, and even enhance physiological responses.”

The study, “Examining the association of vaccine-related mindsets and post-vaccination antibody response, side effects, and affective outcomes,” was authored by Darwin A. Guevarra, Ethan G. Dutcher, Alia J. Crum, Aric A. Prather, and Elissa S. Epel.

Previous Post

New study finds link between ADHD symptoms and distressing sexual problems

Next Post

Teens with depression show unique eye movement patterns linked to memory and attention problems

RELATED

Live music causes brain waves to synchronize more strongly with rhythm than recorded music
Cognitive Science

Cognition might emerge from embodied “grip” with the world rather than abstract mental processes

April 19, 2026
Women’s cognitive abilities remain stable across menstrual cycle
Cognitive Science

Men and women show different relative cognitive strengths across their lifespans

April 19, 2026
Live music causes brain waves to synchronize more strongly with rhythm than recorded music
Cognitive Science

Soft brain implants outperform rigid silicon in long-term safety study

April 18, 2026
Live music causes brain waves to synchronize more strongly with rhythm than recorded music
Cognitive Science

Live music causes brain waves to synchronize more strongly with rhythm than recorded music

April 18, 2026
How common is anal sex? Scientific facts about prevalence, pain, pleasure, and more
Cognitive Science

Higher intelligence in adolescence linked to lower mental illness risk in adulthood

April 17, 2026
Sorting Hat research: What does your Hogwarts house say about your psychological makeup?
Cognitive Science

Maturing brain pathways explain the sudden leap in children’s language skills

April 17, 2026
Republican lawmakers lead the trend of using insults to chase media attention instead of policy wins
Business

Children with obesity face a steep decline in adult economic mobility

April 16, 2026
Study reveals lasting impact of compassion training on moral expansiveness
Meditation

A daily mindfulness habit can improve your memory for future plans

April 15, 2026

STAY CONNECTED

RSS Psychology of Selling

  • Why personalized ads sometimes backfire: A research review explains when tailoring messages works and when it doesn’t
  • The common advice to avoid high customer expectations may not be backed by evidence
  • Personality-matched persuasion works better, but mismatched messages can backfire
  • When happy customers and happy employees don’t add up: How investor signals have shifted in the social media age
  • Correcting fake news about brands does not backfire, five-study experiment finds

LATEST

Believing in a “chemical imbalance” might keep patients on antidepressants longer

Can a common parasite medication calm the brain’s stress circuitry during alcohol withdrawal?

Childhood trauma and attachment styles show nuanced links to alternative sexual preferences

New study reveals how political bias conditions the impact of conspiracy thinking

Cognition might emerge from embodied “grip” with the world rather than abstract mental processes

Men and women show different relative cognitive strengths across their lifespans

Early exposure to forever chemicals linked to altered brain genes and impulsive behavior in rats

Soft brain implants outperform rigid silicon in long-term safety study

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc