A new study published in Sex Roles found that perceptions of sexual consent among college students vary significantly depending on contextual factors like alcohol consumption, relationship type, and evaluator gender.
There is a high prevalence of sexual violence among college-aged individuals. Research highlights that alcohol consumption is frequently present in these encounters, complicating the interpretation of consent. Many campuses advocate for affirmative consent policies, which emphasize clear, verbal, and sober agreements.
Prior research has shown discrepancies between ideal and practical applications of consent communication. In real-world settings, people often rely on nonverbal and ambiguous cues, which can lead to misinterpretation.
Laura A. Pazos and colleagues conducted this study to understand how varying levels of alcohol consumption, relationship dynamics, and participant gender influence perceptions of consent.
The study recruited 111 undergraduate students from two southern universities, aged 21.7 on average. Participants read 36 vignettes in randomized order. These depicted a man initiating sexual activity with a woman, with context varying in terms of consent type (explicitly granted, explicitly denied, or ambiguous), alcohol consumption level (sober, tipsy, or intoxicated), and relationship type (dating or strangers). The gender of evaluators was also collected. Participants rated each vignette on perceived consent, the likelihood of sexual assault, and the target’s willingness to engage on a 6-point Likert scale.
Participants were consistent in distinguishing clearly consensual encounters from nonconsensual ones, with explicitly consensual scenarios receiving the highest ratings for consent and nonconsensual scenarios viewed as indicative of assault. However, ambiguity in consent communication introduced notable variability in perceptions. Scenarios involving women described as tipsy (after one or two drinks) were often interpreted as more consensual and less indicative of assault than those involving sober or intoxicated women. This trend suggests a reliance on moderate alcohol consumption as a misleading indicator of willingness.
Gender differences were also evident in participants’ interpretations. Male respondents were more likely than females to perceive all encounters as consensual, especially those involving intoxicated women, even in cases where consent was ambiguous or explicitly denied. Additionally, the type of relationship between the individuals in the vignette influenced perceptions. Scenarios involving dating partners were less likely to be viewed as indicative of assault compared to those involving strangers, even when consent was ambiguously communicated.
Overall, these findings underscore the complexity of interpreting consent when explicit communication is absent. It also highlights the need for educational efforts to promote safer interactions.
Of note is that the use of vignettes may not fully capture the intricacies of real-world interactions.
The study, “Perceptions of Sexual Consent: The Role of Situational Factors and Participant Gender Among College Students,” was authored by Laura A. Pazos, Daniella K. Cash, Deah S. Quinlivan, and Tiffany D. Russell.
