Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

Study finds the most racially prejudiced people tend to think that they are less racist than the average person

by Eric W. Dolan
June 8, 2020
in Cognitive Science, Racism and Discrimination, Social Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

New research indicates that the Dunning-Kruger effect — meaning the tendency for less competent individuals to overestimate their competence — can be applied to prejudicial attitudes. The study, which appears in Personality and Individual Differences, found that the least egalitarian individuals tended to be those who overestimated their levels of egalitarianism the most.

“I’m generally interested in how prejudice works and in why it’s sometimes difficult to get people to become less prejudiced. This study opened a window into understanding why some people don’t know that they’re prejudiced, and why those people might be particularly difficult to reach,” said study author Keon West, an associate professor of social psychology and the director of Equalab at Goldsmiths, University of London.

The researchers examined who was the most likely to overestimate their level of egalitarianism in two studies with 307 participants.

Participants were asked to report how egalitarian they believed they were in regards to race (in the first study) or gender (in the second study) compared to the other people. They then stated their favorability towards Black people or women in the workplace. The participants also completed Implicit Association Tests (IATs), which measured implicit biases related to race or gender.

The researchers found that those who reported feeling the most unfavorable toward Black people and displayed the most implicit bias toward Black people were also the ones who most strongly overestimated their racial egalitarianism. Similarly, those who reported feeling the most unfavorable toward women in the workplace and displayed the most implicit bias toward women were also the ones who most strongly overestimated their gender-based egalitarianism.

“You don’t know how prejudiced you are. The most egalitarian people in any given group (i.e., the least prejudiced) tend to think of themselves as above-average (or less prejudiced than the average person in the group),” West told PsyPost.

“But unfortunately, the least egalitarian people in the group also think they’re above average. In other words, even the most prejudiced people tend to think that they are less prejudiced than the average. Do you think you’re less prejudiced than the average person? Probably. But that tells you nothing about where you actually stand.”

“The only way to know is some external or objective measure. Do a few IATs or let an independent party look for measurable signs of prejudiced or egalitarian behaviour. If you don’t do that, you’ll never know,” West said.

Similar research has found that people who perform the worst on a political quiz are the most likely to overestimate their political knowledge. People who strongly endorse misinformation about the link between autism and vaccines, meanwhile, are the most likely to believe that they know as much or more than medical doctors about the causes of autism.

The new research provides evidence that the Dunning-Kruger effect occurs for prejudicial attitudes as well. But it is still unclear why prejudiced people are more likely to misjudge their own prejudice.

“We don’t yet know why this effect occurs. Though we do have a few educated guesses based on similar work in other areas. People who overestimate themselves (i.e., think they’re less prejudiced than they are) probably have very simplistic ideas of what prejudice means (e.g., restricted only to the most obvious and aggressive types) or overestimate how prejudiced other people are. We don’t know, but it’s a good place to start,” West explained.

“Many lay people don’t know that there’s a large and expertly established body of scientific evidence about prejudice. There’s a tendency to reduce it to feelings or opinions about personal lived experience. If you’re one of those people, you’re doing yourself a disservice. There are many things that we know, scientifically, about prejudice. Learning those things, and understanding how we’ve come to know them, is a good first step.”

The study, “Prejudiced and unaware of it: Evidence for the Dunning-Kruger model in the domains of racism and sexism“, was authored by Keon West and Asia A. Eaton.

(Photo credit: Stephen Melkisethian)

TweetSendScanShareSendPin24ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Groundbreaking AI model uncovers hidden patterns of political bias in online news
Artificial Intelligence

Groundbreaking AI model uncovers hidden patterns of political bias in online news

May 23, 2025

Researchers developed a large-scale system that detects political bias in web-based news outlets by examining topic selection, tone, and coverage patterns. The AI tool offers transparency and accuracy—even outperforming large language models.

Read moreDetails
A man and woman laying on a bed
Relationships and Sexual Health

Study uncovers three sexual power profiles—and only one is linked to relationship satisfaction

May 22, 2025

A new study reveals that people with flexible gender beliefs and low interest in dominance are most satisfied in relationships, while those with conflicting views on gender roles report more distress.

Read moreDetails
A colorful brain on a black background
Cognitive Science

Neuroscientists discover how “aha” moments rewire the brain to enhance memory

May 22, 2025

A study using brain scans shows that flashes of insight reorganize neural patterns in the visual cortex and engage memory and emotion regions, helping embed the solution more deeply in long-term memory.

Read moreDetails
Scientists uncover potential genetic mechanisms behind the sex bias observed in autism
Political Psychology

Genetic essentialism more common among supporters of radical right-wing parties

May 21, 2025

A new study finds that people who support far-right populist parties in Sweden and Norway are more likely to believe that genes determine social traits, raising concerns about the political implications of genetic essentialism and its links to discrimination.

Read moreDetails
Narcissism negatively predicts partner-enhancement in romantic relationships
Narcissism

Narcissists are more likely to become addicted to social networking sites

May 21, 2025

A study tracking Polish adults over eight months finds that nearly all narcissism types, except sanctity, are tied to social networking site addiction. Some traits even show a bidirectional relationship with addiction symptoms, shedding light on digital-age personality dynamics.

Read moreDetails
New study highlights power—not morality—as key motivator behind competitive victimhood
Social Psychology

New study highlights power—not morality—as key motivator behind competitive victimhood

May 21, 2025

A replication study conducted during the first wave of COVID-19 confirms that need for power, rather than moral concerns, best predicts competitive victimhood in Israeli Arabs and Jews, pointing to deeply rooted motivations in intergroup conflict.

Read moreDetails
Neuroforecasting: New research shows brain activity can predict crowd preferences
Business

Neuroforecasting: New research shows brain activity can predict crowd preferences

May 21, 2025

A new study reveals that brain activity, particularly in regions linked to emotion, predicts market preferences more accurately than self-reported choices—especially when samples aren’t demographically representative. Neural signals offered consistent forecasts even when behavioral data failed.

Read moreDetails
Scientists observe lasting cognitive deficits in long COVID patients
Cognitive Science

Therapeutic video game shows promise for post-COVID cognitive recovery

May 20, 2025

A new study finds that a therapeutic video game, AKL-T01, improved task-switching and processing speed in people with post-COVID cognitive deficits. While sustained attention did not improve, participants reported better quality of life and reduced fatigue after six weeks of gameplay.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Neuroscientists challenge “dopamine detox” trend with evidence from avoidance learning

Non-right-handedness is more common across multiple mental health conditions

Withdrawal symptoms are common after stopping antidepressants

Anxious attachment linked to depression spillover in romantic relationships, study finds

Scientists find 16 new Alzheimer’s-linked genes using multi-ancestry genome data

Groundbreaking AI model uncovers hidden patterns of political bias in online news

Gut bacteria can influence how brain proteins are modified by carbohydrates

“Tiger mom” parenting boosts teens’ cognitive skills but undermines emotional development, study suggests

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy