Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology

Study: People open to experience are more likely to change their voting position

by PsyPost
October 17, 2016
in Political Psychology
Photo credit: Hywell Martinez

Photo credit: Hywell Martinez

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Don't miss out! Follow PsyPost on Bluesky!

People who are open to experience are more likely to change their voting position, according to a recent study published online in Political Psychology. The study also found some evidence that extroverts are more likely to stay loyal to their party.

It has been highlighted that voters who are discontent with the party they voted for have two options: either exit the party and vote for another or stay loyal. Within this, whether voters decide to stay loyal or to exit varies among individuals and is related to an individuals’ personality.

A key conceptualization of personality is formed in the Five Factor Model (FFM), which consists of:  openness to experience, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness and neuroticism. Research has shown that these factors explain a significant proportion of political behavior.

The study, led by Bert Bakker of the University of Amsterdam, proposed that personality traits explain vote switching in two ways. Firstly, individuals high in open to experience are more likely to switch votes because they are more likely to consider new ideas, imagine alternatives, and take risks. Secondly, extroverted individuals are more likely to stay loyal to their party because they are more likely to identify with a party, commit to organizations, and are dominant.

Data was analyzed from the United Kingdom (3,500 respondents) and Denmark (1,972 respondents). British respondents were asked on four occasions between 2005 and 2008, “Which party do you feel closest to?” and “Which party would you vote for tomorrow?” Danish respondents were asked in 2010 and again in 2011, “Which party did you vote for in the last election?” and “Which party would you vote for if an election were held tomorrow?” The analyses also controlled for political interest, external efficacy, ideology, and socioeconomic conditions.

The results revealed that in Denmark, people who are open to experience are more likely to change their voting position, and extroverts are more likely to stay loyal to their party. In the United Kingdom, people who are open to experience are more likely to change their voting position but there was no effect observed with people high in extraversion.

The researchers concluded, “Our findings demonstrate that electoral volatility is, at least partly, rooted in personality.” They add that the findings “expand research on electoral volatility and show that the tendency to change party preference is, at least partly, rooted in deep-seated psychological dispositions.”

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Fascinating study reveals how Trump’s moral rhetoric diverges from common Republican language
Donald Trump

Viral AI-images highlight how Trump engages in “victimcould,” scholar argues

July 6, 2025

How can one of the world's most powerful men also be its biggest victim? A new paper argues it’s a political strategy based on hypothetical, not actual, harm—a concept the author calls “victimcould” used to justify present-day aggression.

Read moreDetails
New study suggests Donald Trump’s “fake news” attacks are backfiring
Political Psychology

Scientists are uncovering more and more unsettling facts about our politics

July 5, 2025

Why has politics become so personal? The answers may lie in our minds. These 13 studies from the new science of political behavior reveal the hidden psychological forces—from personality to primal fear—that are driving us further apart.

Read moreDetails
These common sounds can impair your learning, according to new psychology research
Political Psychology

Despite political tensions, belief in an impending U.S. civil war remains low

July 4, 2025

A new national survey finds that only a small fraction of Americans believe civil war is likely or necessary.

Read moreDetails
Racial and religious differences help explain why unmarried voters lean Democrat
Political Psychology

Student loan debt doesn’t deter civic engagement — it may actually drive it, new research suggests

July 3, 2025

Americans with student loan debt are more likely to vote and engage in political activities than those without debt, likely because they see government as responsible and capable of addressing their financial burden through policy change.

Read moreDetails
Scientists just uncovered a surprising illusion in how we remember time
Mental Health

New research suggests the conservative mental health advantage is a myth

July 3, 2025

Do conservatives really have better mental well-being than liberals? A new study suggests the answer depends entirely on how you ask. The well-known ideological gap disappears when "mental health" is replaced with the less-stigmatized phrase "overall mood."

Read moreDetails
New psychology study sheds light on mysterious “feelings of presence” during isolation
Political Psychology

People who think “everyone agrees with me” are more likely to support populism

July 1, 2025

People who wrongly believe that most others share their political views are more likely to support populist ideas, according to a new study. These false beliefs can erode trust in democratic institutions and fuel resentment toward political elites.

Read moreDetails
Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds
Political Psychology

Radical leaders inspire stronger devotion because they make followers feel significant, study finds

June 28, 2025

A new study finds that voters are more motivated by radical political leaders than moderates, because supporting bold causes makes them feel personally significant—driving greater activism, sacrifice, and long-term engagement across elections in the United States and Poland.

Read moreDetails
Political ambivalence has a surprising relationship with support for violence
Authoritarianism

New study sheds light on the psychological roots of collective violence

June 21, 2025

A new study from Lebanon finds that people with authoritarian beliefs tend to oppose violence against political leaders, while those high in social dominance orientation are more likely to support violence against rival group members.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

New study finds link between sexism and denial of male victimhood in relationships

Viral AI-images highlight how Trump engages in “victimcould,” scholar argues

Breakfast habits are associated with depressive symptoms, study finds

Neuroscientists detect decodable imagery signals in brains of people with aphantasia

Loneliness predicts an increase in TV viewing for older women, but not for men

Othello syndrome: Woman’s rare stroke leads to psychotic delusions of infidelity

How to protect your mental health from a passive-aggressive narcissist

Dark personality traits linked to generative AI use among art students

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy