PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology

Study: People open to experience are more likely to change their voting position

by PsyPost
October 17, 2016
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Photo credit: Hywell Martinez

Photo credit: Hywell Martinez

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

People who are open to experience are more likely to change their voting position, according to a recent study published online in Political Psychology. The study also found some evidence that extroverts are more likely to stay loyal to their party.

It has been highlighted that voters who are discontent with the party they voted for have two options: either exit the party and vote for another or stay loyal. Within this, whether voters decide to stay loyal or to exit varies among individuals and is related to an individuals’ personality.

A key conceptualization of personality is formed in the Five Factor Model (FFM), which consists of:  openness to experience, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness and neuroticism. Research has shown that these factors explain a significant proportion of political behavior.

The study, led by Bert Bakker of the University of Amsterdam, proposed that personality traits explain vote switching in two ways. Firstly, individuals high in open to experience are more likely to switch votes because they are more likely to consider new ideas, imagine alternatives, and take risks. Secondly, extroverted individuals are more likely to stay loyal to their party because they are more likely to identify with a party, commit to organizations, and are dominant.

Data was analyzed from the United Kingdom (3,500 respondents) and Denmark (1,972 respondents). British respondents were asked on four occasions between 2005 and 2008, “Which party do you feel closest to?” and “Which party would you vote for tomorrow?” Danish respondents were asked in 2010 and again in 2011, “Which party did you vote for in the last election?” and “Which party would you vote for if an election were held tomorrow?” The analyses also controlled for political interest, external efficacy, ideology, and socioeconomic conditions.

The results revealed that in Denmark, people who are open to experience are more likely to change their voting position, and extroverts are more likely to stay loyal to their party. In the United Kingdom, people who are open to experience are more likely to change their voting position but there was no effect observed with people high in extraversion.

The researchers concluded, “Our findings demonstrate that electoral volatility is, at least partly, rooted in personality.” They add that the findings “expand research on electoral volatility and show that the tendency to change party preference is, at least partly, rooted in deep-seated psychological dispositions.”

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources
TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • The invisible chore that may matter more for women’s relationship happiness than housework
  • People who favor group-based inequality tend to have less gray matter in an empathy-linked brain region
  • Medication helps adults with ADHD weigh the negative consequences of their decisions
  • Does nail length shape how attractive you are? New research suggests it might
  • Brain scans reveal opposite reward responses in ADHD and autism

Science of Money

  • How short expert recommendation lists change online shopping behavior
  • Why saying “I like it” is more persuasive than “you will like it,” according to psychology
  • When wives earn more, do husbands do more chores?
  • The hidden trade-offs of using venture debt to delay equity dilution
  • How social safety nets are linked to longer lives globally

Recent

  • Screen time not consistently tied to children’s emotional or behavioral problems in a large Scottish study
  • Family background may explain much of the mental health gap tied to sexual orientation, twin studies suggest
  • Belief in supernatural evil is linked to blaming the system for poverty
  • Does voting by mail make for better choices? A 2020 election study suggests it might
  • Pregnant women with a history of childhood neglect show stronger inflammatory reactions to stress
  • High cognitive ability in women predicts workplace victimization
  • Autism in boys and girls looks genetically similar, but early and late diagnoses don’t
  • Women more drawn to hypothetical jobs where most employees were women
  • Emotional blunting is common in depression and bipolar disorder, even after symptoms ease
  • How your personality “acts as an invisible architect for your career,” according to new research

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc