Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive COVID-19

The COVID-19 blame game: Unvaccinated individuals disproportionately scapegoated, study suggests

by Eric W. Dolan
November 9, 2023
in COVID-19
(Image by Tumisu, please consider ☕ Thank you! 🤗 from Pixabay)

(Image by Tumisu, please consider ☕ Thank you! 🤗 from Pixabay)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay informed on the latest psychology and neuroscience research—follow PsyPost on LinkedIn for daily updates and insights.

The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted unprecedented efforts to curb its spread, with vaccinations being a pivotal strategy in reducing mortality and transmission. As vaccines have become widely available, public health experts have strongly encouraged people of all ages to get vaccinated to protect themselves and their communities.

However, this emphasis on vaccination has also given rise to a complex social phenomenon – the stigmatization and prejudice faced by those who choose not to get vaccinated against COVID-19. A recent study published in the Journal of Medical Ethics aimed to investigate whether the negative sentiments directed towards the unvaccinated can be considered a form of scapegoating.

“My colleagues and I have been studying the social divisions surrounding COVID-19 for some time. We have noticed that much of the existing research at that time focused on conflicts originating from people who discount COVID-19, believe in conspiracy theories, and generally undervalue the threat of the virus. We replicated many of those patterns in our own research as well,” said study author Maja Graso, an assistant professor at the University of Groningen.

“However, what we found to be missing was an address to misinformation and the consequences stemming from overestimating the threat. Consider, for instance, how in 2020, more than 30% of Americans believed that a COVID infection led to a 50% chance of hospitalization; it never did, nor was there ever evidence to suggest it might. Left-leaning individuals tended to over-estimate COVID harms to a greater degree than conservatives.”

“Any miscalibration of risk may lead to inappropriate responses, misuse of resources, and social divisions, all of which can further compromise lives and livelihoods. Therefore, with this specific study, we wanted to see whether negative sentiments towards the unvaccinated could be in part explained by dismissing risk factors that would challenge the extent to which the unvaccinated are blamed.”

The research comprised two studies that utilized fictional characters with varying risk profiles and vaccination statuses to gauge public perceptions. In Study 1, participants were asked to evaluate four fictional characters: two low-risk individuals (Katy, 21, and Mark, 38, both without comorbidities) and two high-risk individuals (Mary, 78, with no comorbidities, and Richard, 53, with severe comorbidities).

The characters’ vaccination statuses were manipulated, with each character being either fully vaccinated, unvaccinated, or unvaccinated but having fully recovered from a previous COVID-19 infection. Participants rated the characters’ responsibility for various pandemic-related consequences and estimated their likelihood of hospitalization, death, and recovery.

The results of Study 1, based on 570 American residents, revealed that people were more likely to scapegoat the unvaccinated or unvaccinated-recovered characters compared to the vaccinated characters, regardless of the characters’ risk profiles. In particular, the participants believed that unvaccinated individuals were “responsible for overwhelmed healthcare systems,” “to be blamed for the effects of hospital staff shortages,” “at fault for C19 deaths and hospitalization, and “guilty of severely jeopardizing his/her community’s public health”

Participants also consistently overestimated the chances that low-risk characters would experience severe illness, death, or failure to recover from COVID-19, irrespective of their vaccination status. This suggests that the blame directed towards the unvaccinated may be disproportionate to their actual risk.

Moreover, the study found that liberals were more likely to scapegoat the unvaccinated characters, including those who were unvaccinated but had recovered from COVID-19. In contrast, conservatives were less likely to scapegoat all characters, regardless of their vaccination status.

In Study 2, participants evaluated a 28-year-old, low-risk male character who was either unvaccinated but had recovered from COVID-19 in May 2021 or had received two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine in May 2021. The study aimed to determine if people were more likely to blame the unvaccinated character, even when compared to a vaccinated individual who had not received a booster shot. The same measures used in Study 1 were employed, with an extended scapegoating assessment.

The results of Study 2 indicated that people were more likely to blame the unvaccinated but recovered character. This finding aligned with the political ideology effects observed in Study 1, with liberals more inclined to scapegoat the unvaccinated-recovered character compared to conservatives.

“We were surprised to find that individuals consistently placed more blame on the unvaccinated, even under our most conservative scenario,” Graso told PsyPost. “This last scenario focused solely on a 28-year-old healthy man who works outdoors alone and has either recovered from COVID or got vaccinated more than 6 months ago without plans for a booster. Both characters, the recovered and vaccinated, are at low risk for hospitalization and are equally capable of spreading the virus. Yet, the unvaccinated but recovered character received more blame. Moreover, individuals who identified as liberal were more likely to blame the unvaccinated compared to their conservative counterparts.”

The findings of these two studies suggest that negative sentiments directed towards the unvaccinated during the COVID-19 pandemic may indeed be a form of scapegoating rather than a justified response to a perceived public health threat.

“It conveys a classic, timeless message: people should be aware that good intentions can run awry,” Graso said. “We encourage everyone to consider that misinformation can come in many forms and from many sources. Just as undervaluing the threat can be damaging to public health, lives, and resources, vastly overestimating the COVID-19 threat can also create pressures that lead to poor policy decisions, diversion of resources, and unwarranted blame of individuals who may not be at fault.”

But the study, like all research, includes some caveats. First, the findings may not necessarily generalize to populations outside of the United States or to samples with different political compositions. Second, the study’s conclusions are based on data collected in early 2022, and the dynamics surrounding COVID-19 and vaccination may have evolved since then. Additionally, the research focused on scapegoating judgments and did not assess actual behavior towards unvaccinated individuals.

“We focused solely on individuals’ general and low-level perceptions of blame,” Graso noted. “We did not examine the more severe sentiments that have occasionally been prominent in the media. There is much more research that needs to be done on risk misperceptions that stem from both under-estimating health threats, but also severely over-estimating them.”

“Our own ‘political tribe’ can also be a source of misinformation, yet we may be less adept at recognizing it,” the researcher added.

The study, “Blaming the unvaccinated during the COVID-19 pandemic: the roles of political ideology and risk perceptions in the USA“, was authored by Maja Graso, Karl Aquino, Fan Xuan Chen, and Kevin Bardosh.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

New psychology study sheds light on mysterious “feelings of presence” during isolation
COVID-19

Frequent dreams and nightmares surged worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic

July 1, 2025

An international study of over 15,000 adults across 16 countries found that dream recall and nightmares became more common during the pandemic, with sleep duration, age, and gender all playing a role in how often people experienced them.

Read moreDetails
Some dark personality traits may help buffer against depression, new psychology research suggests
COVID-19

COVID-19 coverage linked to rise in anti-Asian sentiment, especially among Trump supporters

June 17, 2025

Americans became less favorable toward Asians as COVID-19 spread and news coverage intensified, according to a new study. The drop was strongest among Trump supporters, highlighting how political rhetoric and fear shaped public opinion during the pandemic.

Read moreDetails
Coronavirus anxiety linked to obsessive healthy eating behaviors during the pandemic
COVID-19

Coronavirus anxiety linked to obsessive healthy eating behaviors during the pandemic

May 30, 2025

A new study suggests pandemic-related anxiety may have fueled orthorexia nervosa—an unhealthy obsession with clean eating. The findings reveal how fear of COVID-19, combined with low cognitive flexibility, contributed to disordered eating behaviors in U.S. adults.

Read moreDetails
New study flips the script on conspiracy beliefs and economic insecurity
Conspiracy Theories

New research highlights spite as a motivator of conspiracy theory beliefs

May 30, 2025

Psychologists have found that conspiracy theory beliefs may stem from spite triggered by feelings of social, existential, or cognitive disadvantage. The findings suggest that tackling misinformation requires addressing deeper social inequalities and psychological frustrations.

Read moreDetails
Study suggests shared genetic roots between psychiatric disorders and COVID-19 risk
COVID-19

Study suggests shared genetic roots between psychiatric disorders and COVID-19 risk

May 26, 2025

A large-scale genetic study links depression, PTSD, and ADHD to increased COVID-19 risk, highlighting shared biological pathways involving immunity and stress response.

Read moreDetails
Scientists observe lasting cognitive deficits in long COVID patients
Cognitive Science

Therapeutic video game shows promise for post-COVID cognitive recovery

May 20, 2025

A new study finds that a therapeutic video game, AKL-T01, improved task-switching and processing speed in people with post-COVID cognitive deficits. While sustained attention did not improve, participants reported better quality of life and reduced fatigue after six weeks of gameplay.

Read moreDetails
Pandemic-era children show altered brain responses to facial expressions, new study finds
COVID-19

Pandemic-era children show altered brain responses to facial expressions, new study finds

April 5, 2025

Children tested during the COVID-19 pandemic show reduced sensitivity to emotional expressions, particularly happiness—highlighting possible effects of limited social exposure in early development.

Read moreDetails
The surprising relationship between vaccinations and Alzheimer’s disease
Cognitive Science

Scientists observe surprising link between mindset and vaccine outcomes

April 4, 2025

How you think about the COVID-19 vaccine may shape how your body and mind respond to it, new research suggests—affecting everything from side effects to antibody levels.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Neuroscientists decode how people juggle multiple items in working memory

Inside the bored brain: Unlocking the power of the default mode network

Choline imbalance in the brain linked to with cognitive symptoms in young depression patients

Scientists who relocate more often start Nobel research up to two years earlier

Sedentary time linked to faster brain aging in older adults, study finds

People with short-video addiction show altered brain responses during decision-making

New study uncovers a surprising effect of cold-water immersion

Being adopted doesn’t change how teens handle love and dating

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy