PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Mental Health

Trying to make other people happy makes us happier than trying to make ourselves happy

by Beth Ellwood
January 19, 2022
Reading Time: 3 mins read
(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

(Photo credit: Adobe Stock)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

The secret to happiness may lie in doing things to make other people happy, rather than ourselves, according to a series of five studies published in the Journal of Positive Psychology. The findings suggest that doing things for others enhances well-being by fulfilling a psychological need for connection with others — even if that person is a stranger.

All of us strive toward that coveted state of happiness. In Western culture, this is often seen as a self-focused mission involving the egoistic pursuit of personal goals. But a growing body of research suggests a more fruitful approach to happiness. It seems that, ironically, happiness comes from seeking joy for others rather than ourselves.

Among this research is a series of five studies launched by Liudmila Titova and Kennon M. Sheldon. Throughout these studies, which were mainly conducted among university students in the Mid-Western United States, the researchers tested whether participants would report a greater boost in well-being after trying to make another person happy versus trying to make themselves happy.

An initial study asked students to recall a time when they did something to make someone else happy, and a time when they did something to make themselves happy. When asked how they had felt about each experience, students recalled feeling greater well-being during the other-directed activity compared to the self-directed one.

A second study further suggested that the social interaction involved in helping another person was not driving the effect of the other-focused activity. During an experiment, students who were asked to do something to make another person happy later reported greater well-being than those who were asked to simply socialize or to do something to make themselves happy.

A “spillover” effect also did not appear to be responsible for the effect. In another experiment, the researchers found that participants’ well-being was not significantly linked to the well-being of the person they were trying to make happy. This suggests that doing something for someone else was not improving participants’ well-being through a spillover of the other person’s happiness. Instead, the extent that participants believed they were making the person happy was positively tied to their own well-being, suggesting that it was the perception that they made someone happy that made them feel good.

In a fourth study, the researchers wondered whether people would feel better when they tried to make someone else happy or when someone else tried to make them happy. They found that students recalled feeling greater well-being during a time when they tried to make someone else happy versus a time when someone else tried to make them happy.

A final experiment revealed that this boost in well-being occurs even when the person being helped is a total stranger. Passersby on the street were given two quarters and randomly assigned to one of four conditions. They were instructed to either keep the change as a reward for the survey, to put the change in their own parking meters, to put the change in a stranger’s meter, or to put the change in a stranger’s meter along with a note explaining what they did. It was found that participants reported the highest well-being when they put the money in the stranger’s meter, and the effect was slightly weaker when they fed the stranger’s meter without a note.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

Notably, the studies pointed to a psychological mechanism for why benevolent behavior increases happiness. It was found that the basic psychological need for relatedness — the need to feel connected to others — mediated the effect of the other-focused activity in all five studies. In other words, feeling a greater connection to others explained why doing something for another person tended to leave participants happier than doing something for themselves.

Titova and Sheldon note a few limitations to their research. For example, in the third study, they were unable to clearly test whether the participant’s kind behavior actually improved the target’s well-being. “It would be beneficial to examine the effect in a full actor-partner model, where both participants have a chance to do something to improve mood and happiness of one another,” the study authors suggest. Additionally, they say it would be interesting for future studies to examine the possible long-term effects of trying to make others happy, exploring how it measures up as “an overall life-strategy.”

The study, “Happiness comes from trying to make others feel good, rather than oneself”, was authored by Liudmila Titova and Kennon M. Sheldon.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin14ShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Early giftedness rarely lasts into adulthood, large developmental study finds
  • Scientists identify 19 core dimensions of positive mental health in new consensus study
  • Brain imaging study links childhood trauma to chronic procrastination in adulthood
  • Study links short-form video addiction to a decline in teenagers’ academic coping skills
  • Scientists discover a previously unknown cognitive benefit of aerobic exercise

Science of Money

  • The networking blind spot that could be holding back your next big product
  • Did voters punish inflation or pay cuts? A county-by-county look at the 2024 election
  • Can criticism be a sign of brand loyalty? A study of gaming communities says yes
  • What a brainwave headset revealed about why some traders make money and others don’t
  • When beauty backfires: Why some shoppers steer clear of good-looking salespeople

Recent

  • Scientists found a subtle social cue that reveals your choices
  • Could a simple supplement combo help adolescents with ADHD stay on task?
  • Brief smartphone check-ins can forecast the return of psychotic symptoms
  • Neuroscientists uncover a universal mechanism for human decision making
  • Genetic data indicates distinct metabolic pathways for different mental health disorders
  • Breathing exercises blunt the body’s physical reaction to acute stress
  • Higher body fat in pregnancy may influence child ADHD risk through inflammation
  • Daily, but not weekly, psilocin mucate lowers cortisol and anxiety in stressed rats
  • Frustration, not fear of judgment, drives the rise of independent voters
  • Why do some children develop ADHD after stressful events while others do not?

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc