Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology

Underlying psychological traits could explain why political satire tends to be liberal

by Eric W. Dolan
May 11, 2019
in Political Psychology
(Photo credit: Comedy Central/YouTube)

(Photo credit: Comedy Central/YouTube)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay on top of the latest psychology findings: Subscribe now!

The need for cognition — a psychological term used to describe the enjoyment of thinking and analyzing problems — could help explain the differences in humor appreciation between liberals and conservatives.

According to new research in Psychology of Popular Media Culture, political conservatives tend to score lower on a measure of need for cognition, which is related to their lack of appreciation for irony and exaggeration.

“Having studied the content, effects, and psychological processing of political humor and satire for 20 years, I could never escape the question of why political satire tends to be liberal,” said study author Dannagal G. Young, an associate professor at the University of Delaware and author of the forthcoming book Irony and Outrage: The Polarized Landscape of Rage, Fear, and Laughter in the United States.

“Everywhere I went, I was asked this question, and I had never been satisfied with my response. Digging into the literature on the psychological profiles of liberals and conservatives opened a window into a new explanatory mechanism – that the ‘liberal bias’ of satire does not stem from the content, target, or function of those jokes, but rather from the rhetorical structure of humor itself – especially in the case of irony.”

In the study, 305 participants watched and evaluated a series of jokes about a variety of apolitical topics. For each topic, the researchers crafted two types of joke: one version used irony to humorous effect, while the other used exaggeration.

For example, some participants viewed this irony-based joke:

The other participants viewed this exaggeration-based joke:

After evaluating the jokes, the participants then completed measures of need for cognition, tolerance for ambiguity, need to evaluate, sense of humor, and political ideology.

Young and her colleagues found that more conservative participants tended to show less appreciation of both forms of jokes.

This relationship was partially explained by need for cognition and sense of humor. In other words, conservatives tended to agree with statements such as “I only think as hard as I have to” and “People who tell jokes are a pain in the neck,” which in turn was associated with less positive evaluations of the jokes.

“The study provides empirical evidence that conservatives and liberals differ in their appreciation and comprehension of humor, especially in the case of irony. Even when the subject matter is not political at all, conservatives are less appreciative of incongruity-based humorous texts than liberals are,” Young told PsyPost.

“This difference is due in part to the fact that liberals and conservatives have different underlying psychological and personality traits that shape how they interact with messages in the environment. Liberals tend to be higher in need for cognition.”

“They are also more likely to value the production and consumption of humor in general. In this study, both of these traits accounted — in part — for liberals’ higher appreciation of both irony and exaggeration, compared to conservatives.”

The study — like all research — includes some limitations. Though need for cognition explains some of the relationship, “much of the impact of conservatism on humor appreciation remains unaccounted for,” the researchers said.

It is also possible that the format of the jokes reminded participants of The Daily Show, Last Week Tonight with John Oliver, or Saturday Night Live‘s Weekend Update.

“It is very possible that the format and visual cue of the comic behind a desk signaled to conservative viewers that this content was similar in spirit and intent to that of late-night comedy (hence, it may have been perceived as left-leaning even though the jokes were not political),” Young said.

“This might explain conservatives’ lower appreciation of the content. Future research could explore various novel formats to avoid that confound.”

The study, “Psychology, Political Ideology, and Humor Appreciation: Why Is Satire So Liberal?” was authored by Dannagal G. Young, Benjamin E. Bagozzi, Abigail Goldring, Shannon Poulsen, and Erin Drouin.

RELATED

Study finds Trump and Harris used distinct rhetoric in 2024—but shared more similarities than expected
Political Psychology

Study finds Trump and Harris used distinct rhetoric in 2024—but shared more similarities than expected

August 24, 2025

Donald Trump and Kamala Harris framed the 2024 presidential debate in starkly different terms, according to a new study—but their language also showed surprising overlap in tone, emotional content, and specificity.

Read moreDetails
Americans broadly agree on what’s “woke,” but partisan cues still shape perceptions
Political Psychology

Americans broadly agree on what’s “woke,” but partisan cues still shape perceptions

August 22, 2025

Do Americans agree on what “woke” means? A new study suggests yes—up to a point. The term tends to signal different things depending on political identity, especially around race, gender, and alignment with the Democratic Party.

Read moreDetails
Narcissistic grandiosity predicts greater involvement in LGBTQ activism
Moral Psychology

New psychology research finds leftist causes widely seen as more moral — even by conservatives

August 21, 2025

A pair of studies conducted in Spain provides evidence of a striking moral asymmetry in politics: both leftists and rightists feel more morally obligated to defend progressive causes, and conservatives tend to view liberals as more morally upright than vice versa.

Read moreDetails
People high in psychopathy and low in cognitive ability are the most politically active online, study finds
Political Psychology

People high in psychopathy and low in cognitive ability are the most politically active online, study finds

August 20, 2025

New research highlights a striking pattern: individuals with high psychopathic traits and lower cognitive ability tend to be the most politically active online. The study also links fear of missing out to digital engagement across eight diverse national contexts.

Read moreDetails
The brain is shown with a wave of sound
Neuroimaging

Early brain responses to political leaders’ faces appear unaffected by partisanship

August 15, 2025

New research suggests that while the brain quickly distinguishes politicians from strangers, it doesn’t initially register political allegiance. The findings challenge assumptions about how early partisan bias kicks in during perception and suggest that party loyalty may emerge later.

Read moreDetails
People with narcissistic tendencies report more ostracism and are more often excluded
Political Psychology

Intellectual humility is linked to less political and religious polarization across the board

August 10, 2025

A large online study indicates that intellectual humility is linked to less hostility toward political and religious opponents. The effect was seen across political parties and belief systems, and persisted even after controlling for the strength of participants’ convictions.

Read moreDetails
Antagonistic narcissism and psychopathic tendencies predict left-wing antihierarchical aggression, study finds
Political Psychology

Populism may act as a “thermometer” for democratic health

August 8, 2025

Long-term data from Britain and the Netherlands reveal that citizens’ populist beliefs rise and fall alongside changes in democratic satisfaction. The research challenges the idea that populist attitudes are static traits and highlights their potential responsiveness to political reforms.

Read moreDetails
Professors who use safe space language seen as more caring—and more authoritarian
Authoritarianism

Professors who use safe space language seen as more caring—and more authoritarian

August 7, 2025

A new study finds that safe space statements can make students feel more comfortable and open in the classroom—but also make instructors seem more liberal and authoritarian. Trigger warnings, by contrast, had no meaningful impact on students’ perceptions.

Read moreDetails

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Letting loose with a swear word may actually make you stronger

Pilates may help treat female sexual dysfunction, new study indicates

Is ChatGPT making us stupid?

Children raised in poverty are less likely to believe in a just world

Religious attendance linked to greater support for youth tackle football, study finds

Virtual workout partners may not be real but they still feel real enough to boost your exercise

New research identifies multiple personal, social, and biological risk factors for PTSD

Psilocybin and MDMA may reset fear-related brain-immune signaling, scientists find

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy