Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

What’s the optimum amount of homework to set a teenager?

by The Conversation
April 24, 2015
in Cognitive Science
Photo credit: Chris Yarzab (Creative Commons)

Photo credit: Chris Yarzab (Creative Commons)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Coaxing teenagers to sit down and do their homework is never an easy task. But is it actually worth their while to slave away for hours on end every evening? Not according to a new study of Spanish secondary school students which has concluded that the optimum amount of homework for children is around one hour a day.

Researchers at the University of Oviedo studied the maths and science homework and test results of 7,451 adolescents with an average age of around 13. They found a relationship between the amount of homework completed and children’s attainment. But the authors acknowledge they can’t say definitively that one hour of homework a night in total actually causes better test results.

Previous research in this area is both inconsistent and inconclusive. Some has shown the positive effects of homework and some its negative effects. In 2012, The Guardian reported on Department of Education research showing that two to three hours per day produced greater effects on achieving the highest results. In 2014, research at Stanford University found that too much homework can have a negative impact on children.

Homework can help to establish a routine and to develop independent learning skills that will be useful for professional life. Conversely, it could be argued that working at home in the evenings is the beginning of an unhealthy work-life balance and that there are academic drawbacks in studying instead of sleeping.

Not all children need to study the same

It’s unclear whether the children in the Spanish study achieve more as a result of doing the “optimum” amount of homework. Children of different abilities may take different amounts of time to complete their homework. If we subscribe to the idea that there is an “optimum” time, then we are effectively saying that children who work more quickly should complete more homework than children who work more slowly, which is arguably a disincentive for the fastest – and probably the most able – children.

The study also acknowledges that the nature of the homework has more influence over the outcomes than the time taken to complete it. This is an important point and is underpinned by a common sense view that an hour of inappropriate homework will be less effective than 45 minutes of appropriate homework.

It is only through understanding what the goals of homework are that we can properly consider how much should be set. There has been much disagreement about this among researchers: some argue that homework is about consolidating new knowledge and improving test scores, while others argue that homework is about developing skills.

The reality is that teachers set homework with different purposes, so any optimal amount of homework is unlikely to apply to all situations. In the context of mathematics, homework is often about practising a particular process – such as solving equations – whereas in other subject areas there may be a more conceptual focus, such as research into a particular aspect of history.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

Giving some an advantage

Even if we accept that there is an optimum amount of homework, there are numerous other factors that need to be considered, including the subject area, the length of the school day, the socio-economic background of the student and the age, gender and culture of the student. With so many factors to consider, it is challenging to ensure both equity and excellence – and it is most likely impossible to generalise about an optimum amount of homework.

For example, parents from middle-class families are more likely to be able to support their children with homework or to hire a tutor. This means those children from disadvantaged backgrounds become further disadvantaged as they are likely to have less academic support at home.

The cultural variations between children are also significant, not only from the family perspective, but from the expectations of society. For example, children in China and the UK have very different expectations and experiences in terms of the volume of homework set. It has also long been argued that girls outperform boys in coursework, which is not dissimilar to homework.

So it is difficult to generalise that all 13-year-olds should be set no more than one hour of homework a day. Every child has a unique set of individual needs that may vary over time. There has been much discussion in recent years about personalised learning in the classroom, but less so about the benefits of personalised learning through homework. One hour a day may well be the optimum amount of homework for some children in some circumstances, but let us not forget that every child has different needs.

The ConversationBy Adam Boddison, University of Warwick

This article was originally published on The Conversation.
Read the original article.

Previous Post

Risk perception: Social exchange can amplify subjective fears

Next Post

Mental disorders don’t predict future violence

RELATED

Researchers identify two psychological traits that predict conspiracy theory belief
Artificial Intelligence

Brain-controlled assistive robots work best when they share the workload with users

March 8, 2026
How common is anal sex? Scientific facts about prevalence, pain, pleasure, and more
Cognitive Science

New psychology research reveals that wisdom acts as a moral compass for creative thinking

March 6, 2026
Hemp-derived cannabigerol shows promise in reducing anxiety — and maybe even improving memory
Alcohol

Using cannabis to cut back on alcohol? Your working memory might dictate if it works

March 5, 2026
Chocolate lovers’ brains: How familiarity influences reward processing
Cognitive Science

A single dose of cocoa flavanols improves cognitive performance during aerobic exercise

March 4, 2026
Heart and brain illustration with electrocardiogram waves, representing cardiovascular health and neurological connection, suitable for psychology and medical research articles.
Cognitive Science

Fascinating new research reveals your heart rate drops when your brain misperceives the world

March 4, 2026
Colorful digital illustration of a human brain with neon wireframe lines, representing neuroscience, psychology, and brain research. Ideal for psychology news, brain health, and cognitive sciences articles.
Cognitive Science

New research on acquired aphantasia pinpoints specific brain network responsible for visual imagination

March 3, 2026
Traumatic brain injury may steer Alzheimer’s pathology down a different path
Cognitive Science

Growing up with solid cooking fuels linked to long-term brain health risks

March 1, 2026
The disturbing impact of exposure to 8 minutes of TikTok videos revealed in new study
Cognitive Science

Problematic TikTok use correlates with social anxiety and daily cognitive errors

March 1, 2026

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Massive global study links the habit of forgiving others to better overall well-being

Neuroscientists have pinpointed a potential biological signature for psychopathy

Supportive relationships are linked to positive personality changes

Brain-controlled assistive robots work best when they share the workload with users

Common airborne chemicals are linked to suicidal thoughts in a new public health study

New research sheds light on the psychological recipe for a grudge

Eating ultra-processed foods is not linked to faster mental decline, study finds

Hypocrisy and intolerance drive religious doubt among college students

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc