PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

Why does simply trusting your feelings lead to much better predictions?

by University of Chicago Press Journals
April 16, 2012
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Man and woman thinkingIf you trust your feelings you are better able to predict future events—from the weather to the stock market, according to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research. Of course, you need to know a little about what you’re predicting.

“Will it rain tomorrow? Who will win American Idol? How high (or low) will the Dow Jones be next week? Who will be our next president?” From the mundane to the phenomenal, the ability to predict what will happen in the future is among the most prized of human faculties,” write authors Michel Tuan Pham, Leonard Lee (both Columbia University), and Andrew T. Stephen (University of Pittsburgh).

Over the course of eight studies, the authors found that individuals who trusted their feelings about their knowledge were better able to predict the outcomes of various future events than people who had less trust in their feelings.

This phenomenon, which the authors call the “emotional oracle effect” was proven across a broad range of predictions, including the outcome of the 2008 U.S. Democratic presidential nomination, movie success at the box office, the winner of American Idol, movements of the stock market, the outcome of a national college football championship, and the weather.

For example, in one study, 175 online participants from 46 U.S. states completed a task that induced high or low trust in their feelings. Then they were asked to predict the weather in their respective zip codes for the next two days. “A comparison between predicted and actual weather conditions revealed that 54 percent of the participants with a high trust in feelings made the correct prediction, more than twice the proportion of participants with a low trust in feelings who predicted correctly (21 percent).”

The effect held true whether the participants’ trust in their feelings was simply measured or manipulated. However, it was limited by background knowledge. When people in the weather study were asked to predict the weather in far-away locales or two weeks later instead of two days, their predictions lost their advantage.

“We hypothesize that this intriguing emotional oracle effect arises because trusting one’s feelings encourages access to a ‘privileged window’ into the vast amount of predictive information people learn, almost unconsciously, about their environments over time,” the authors conclude. “Relying on feelings allows people to tap into all they tacitly know, compared to relying on logical input which only captures partial perspectives of the events.”

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources
TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Specific cognitive skills rival general intelligence in predicting socioeconomic success
  • Mapping the dark triad: Which countries have the most narcissistic and manipulative populations?
  • Fascinating findings emerge from recent LSD research
  • Study finds unpredictable childhood environments are linked to borderline personality traits in adulthood
  • Is intelligence related to happiness?

Science of Money

  • Do the stars really shape your paycheck? A study of 11 million German records says no
  • Why some companies fight climate rules while their rivals push for them
  • California’s $20 fast-food wage: mobile phone data reveals staffing cuts started before the law took effect
  • New study blames authoritarian bosses for the quiet quitting trend
  • Three types of older jobseekers, three very different odds of getting hired

Recent

  • Reclaimed hate speech backfires by desensitizing listeners, study finds
  • Rising testosterone levels predict anxiety and depression risk in preteen girls
  • Compulsive gamers and gamblers share similar traits, but different emotional triggers
  • The skin-brain axis: New research highlights the link between mental well-being and skin health
  • High-achieving working mothers face harsher moral judgments for parenting mistakes
  • Learning a new skill triggers both temporary cell swelling and lasting structural growth in the human brain
  • New study links digital “brain rot” to a cascading sequence of psychological burdens
  • Scientists identify five key factors linked to happiness across 66 countries
  • The psychological power of naming legislation after victims
  • Chemical signals in umbilical cord blood predict childhood neurodevelopmental disorders

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc