Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Why women regret saying yes to casual sex much more often than men do

by Norwegian Institute of Science and Technology
January 19, 2017
in Social Psychology
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Have you ever ended up in bed with someone without it turning into anything more? You’re far from alone.

The numbers vary a lot with sources and countries, but a rather safe bet is that around half of people in Western Europe and the USA will have at least one one-night stand. In some countries maybe as many as 7 out of 10.Why 

But how men and women experience the “morning after” varies greatly between the sexes.

“Women regret that they agreed to a one-night stand more often than men. Men regret passing up the chance more than women,” says Professor Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology’s (NTNU) Department of Psychology.

These are the results of a previous American study. Kennair and Associate Professor Mons Bendixen wanted to see whether this is also true in Norway, which is supposedly a more sexually liberal and egalitarian country. They also wanted to try and find out why the results varied so much by gender. The Norwegian researchers collaborated with evolutionary psychologist David Buss of the University of Texas at Austin.

Same differences in Norway

Kennair, Bendixen and Buss found exactly the same pattern in Norway as in the U.S.

A larger proportion of women than men regretted the last time they had casual sex. Around 35 per cent of women and only 20 per cent of men regretted the experience to some degree.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

“So we’re not saying that there aren’t men who regret casual sex,” says Kennair.

But it is far more common for women to regret saying yes. They are also less unequivocally happy about the experience.

About 30 per cent of women in Norway were happy about their most recent casual sex experience, as were over 50 per cent of the men, according to Bendixen.

Only men regret saying no

At the same time, nearly 80 per cent of women were happy that they said no to casual sex last time. Only 43 per cent of men were totally happy that they passed it up.

“Women regretted having a one-night stand the most, but they weren’t sorry about saying no at all, says Kennair.

But that’s not the biggest difference. Very few women regretted saying no. But nearly 30 per cent of the men regretted not having casual sex, according to Bendixen.

Several possible explanations

Women worry more than men generally, and they worry about more than just casual sex. As Kennair sums it up, men do stupid things that they die from. Fewer women do these stupid things.

But this basic phenomenon does not change the study’s main conclusion that women and men react so differently to one-night stands.

So why such dramatic gender differences in regret?

The researchers found no difference in regret between those who were single and those who were in a relationship, so they did not take partner status into account in their further analyses.

However, they did examine several possible reasons for regret, such as pregnancy concerns, STD infections and getting a bad reputation.

Across the board, women worry more about all these factors. But this doesn’t explain why Norwegian women regretted casual sex so much more than men did, though, said Bendixen and Kennair.

And worry was certainly not the reason why virtually only men regretted saying no.

Less sexual gratification for women?

It’s conceivable that women feel more regretful because they do not get as much sexual pleasure out of a one-night stand as men do. Maybe they regret it more because they don’t have an orgasm?

This idea led the researchers to also ask whether participants achieved an orgasm or not.

Not surprisingly, men had orgasms during sex to a far greater extent than women the last time they had casual sex. But at the same time, the results show that far fewer women than men think orgasm is particularly important.

Both women and men are more regretful about one-night stands that did not end in orgasm for them. But overall, lack of sexual satisfaction does not seem to play into why women regret the experience more often than men.

“Men enjoy casual sex considerably more, but this doesn’t explain the gender difference in regret, because gender is the most important influencing factor for both orgasm probability and sexual regret after casual sex,” says Professor Kennair.

So what can be the reason?

Basic difference

An overall explanation presumably lies in the fundamental differences between men and women.

The study results support theories of parental investment and sexual strategy: men and women have throughout generations invested differently in their relationships and any children that resulted.

We’re talking evolution psychology here.

All of us are descendants of individuals who managed to reproduce. Passing our genes on to the next generation as effectively as possible is the ultimate biological goal for everyone. If you don’t, your genes die out eventually.

Through evolution, nature weeds out what is not working. But when it comes to short-term sex, the best strategy is fundamentally different for men and women.

“Due to selective pressure from the big difference in parental investment, one would expect men and women to regret different aspects of casual sex decisions – having casual sex with the wrong partner versus missing a casual sexual opportunity,” notes the article about the study published in Evolutionary Psychology.

This might require an explanation.

Men are limited by access

Men can theoretically father thousands of children and are primarily limited, at least in theory for most of us, by the supply of willing, fertile women. Men who could reproduce freely would be able to afford having some of the kids fail to multiply as long as most functioned serviceably.

“Women and men differ fundamentally in their sexual psychology,” says Professor Buss. “A key limitation on men’s reproductive success, historically, has been sexual access to fertile women. These evolutionary selection pressures have created a male sexual mind that is attentive to sexual opportunities.”

The quality of one’s sexual partner in short-term relationships plays a lesser role biologically for men. Assuming women did not avoid having sex with them, men who ran from woman to woman and got them pregnant would have scored best in the evolutionary race.

“The winner takes them all,” says Kennair with a smile.

Few men have such unlimited access to the other sex, but quantity over quality has been the main strategy for men in general.

Consider this example. A married man with two children, historically, could have increased his reproductive success by a full 50 percent by impregnating one other woman.

Men do not think about these things consciously, of course. Rather, men’s sexual psychology is highly attuned to sexual opportunities and they experience regret at missed sexual opportunities.

Women see it differently. Partner quality has been far more important to them.

Women have the most to lose

Our ancestral mothers rarely could have increased their reproductive success by adding additional sex partners.

Women can seldom have more than 10-15 children during their lifetime, no matter how much they try. Obviously most women today bear far fewer children than that. The quality of the children, and thus the quality of the sexual partner who contributes to the children’s genes, is far more important for women than for men.

“Female choice–deciding when, where, and with whom to have sex– is perhaps the most fundamental principle of women’s sexual psychology,” says Dr. Buss.

For a woman, an ideal partner helps raise their children in order to give the next generation the best possible conditions to reproduce.

For most women through the generations, it has been important to secure a partner of high quality who was willing to invest more in their children together, and who did not waste resources by getting involved with other women and their potential children.

Thus it is quite natural that women regret casual sex much more with a man who is not an ideal partner. Women have for generations had much more to lose.

Culture does not change biology

Of course, most Norwegian women manage much better on their own today than they did even a few generations ago.

Many of the ancestral conditions that created these fundamentally different male and female sexual psychologies are no longer with us, especially in Norway.

Men are less important than they were in the past for providing resources to children. Women earn their own money, society offers various support schemes, and women are largely able to raise children without appreciably involving a man beyond the actual fertilization.

In sexually liberal countries one’s reputation is not necessarily harmed in the same way as it once might have been by having casual sex. Effective contraceptives that women have control over also reduce the risk of getting pregnant with a partner who is less than ideal. But the fear of getting pregnant with a less suitable partner can still hang on, consciously or not. So can the fear of a bad reputation.

“Many social scientists expect that in sexually egalitarian cultures such as Norway, these sex differences would disappear. They do not. This fact makes the findings on sex differences in sexual regret in modern Norwegian people so fascinating scientifically,” says Dr. Buss.

New cultural changes, it turns out, do not alter our biological foundation. Evolution doesn’t work that way. The underlying gender differences in parental investment in offspring and the way we act do not change within a few generations.

Our evolved sexual psychology is the only one we have. It operates in the modern world as much as our evolved food preferences, whether or not it is currently adaptive.

The study participants consisted of 263 students aged 19 to 37 years. All had at least one one-night stand behind them.

Previous Post

One in 5 adults secretly access their friends’ Facebook accounts

Next Post

Brain stimulation used like a scalpel to improve memory

RELATED

Want friends to like you more? Venting can help, but there’s a catch
Social Psychology

How to make friends: Scientists have uncovered some intriguing new details

March 22, 2026
ChatGPT’s social trait judgments align with human impressions, study finds
Artificial Intelligence

Efforts to make AI inclusive accidentally create bizarre new gender biases, new research suggests

March 22, 2026
Left-wing authoritarianism tied to greater acceptance of brutal war tactics
Political Psychology

Political ideology shapes views on acceptable civilian casualties in war

March 21, 2026
Machiavellianism most pronounced in students of politics and law, least pronounced in students of social work, nursing and education
Cognitive Science

Intelligence predicts progressive views, but only after college

March 21, 2026
Dark personality traits linked to “social zapping”: New study examines people who cancel plans at the last minute
Narcissism

Why a widely disliked personality trait might actually protect your mental health

March 20, 2026
Fear of being single, romantic disillusionment, dating anxiety: Untangling the psychological connections
Dating

New research reveals why storytelling works better than bullet points in online dating

March 20, 2026
Building muscle strength may help prevent depression, especially in women
Business

New study finds link between receptivity to “corporate bullshit” and weaker leadership skills

March 20, 2026
Victimhood and Trump’s Big Lie: New study links white grievance to election skepticism
Political Psychology

Researchers use machine learning to reveal how gasoline prices drive presidential approval ratings

March 20, 2026

STAY CONNECTED

RSS Psychology of Selling

  • What actually makes millennials buy products on sale?
  • The surprising coping strategy that may help salespeople avoid burnout
  • When saying sorry with a small discount actually makes things worse
  • How dark and light personality traits relate to business owner well-being
  • Why mobile game fail ads make you want to download the app

LATEST

Study links psilocybin receptor activation to sustained structural brain changes

People with cannabis disorder do not seem to pay increased attention to pictures of cannabis

In sickness and in health? How a medical condition impacts your chances of finding and keeping love

How to make friends: Scientists have uncovered some intriguing new details

Albert Einstein’s brain: What have scientists discovered?

The biological roots behind the chills you get from music and art

Lab-grown brain models reveal unique electrical patterns in different types of autism

Efforts to make AI inclusive accidentally create bizarre new gender biases, new research suggests

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc