Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Artificial Intelligence

Young children are more likely to trust information from robots over humans

by Eric W. Dolan
May 28, 2024
in Artificial Intelligence, Developmental Psychology, Social Psychology
(Photo credit: Stephen Chin/Wikimedia Commons)

(Photo credit: Stephen Chin/Wikimedia Commons)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Don't miss out! Follow PsyPost on Bluesky!

A recent study published in the journal Computers in Human Behavior sheds light on how young children decide who to trust when faced with conflicting information from humans and robots. Researchers found that children aged three to six are more likely to trust robots over humans when both sources of information are established as reliable.

The motivation behind the study was to understand how children decide whom to trust when faced with conflicting information from humans and robots. With the increasing presence of robots and other technological devices in children’s lives, it is important to explore how these interactions influence their learning and development.

For their study, the researchers recruited 118 children through various channels, including mailing lists, social media, and the website Children Helping Science. After excluding data from seven children who failed preliminary checks, 111 participants were included in the final analysis.

The study was conducted online using the Qualtrics survey platform, with parents guiding their children through the process. Children were randomly assigned to watch videos featuring one of three pairs of agents: both a reliable human and a reliable robot, a reliable robot and an unreliable human, or a reliable human and an unreliable robot. This setup allowed researchers to compare children’s preferences for reliable versus unreliable agents across different conditions.

The study comprised three phases: history, test, and preference. In the history phase, children watched videos where the human and robot agents labeled familiar objects. Depending on the condition, one agent consistently labeled objects correctly while the other labeled them incorrectly. This phase aimed to establish the reliability or unreliability of each agent in the children’s minds.

In the test phase, children were shown videos of the same agents labeling novel objects with unfamiliar names. They were first asked whom they wanted to ask for the name of the object (ask trials), and after hearing both agents provide a label, they were asked which label they thought was correct (endorse trials). This phase measured the children’s trust in the agents based on the reliability established during the history phase.

Finally, in the preference phase, children answered questions assessing their social attitudes toward the agents. These questions included who they would prefer to tell a secret to, who they wanted as a friend, who they thought was smarter, and who they preferred as a teacher.

As expected, the researchers found that children were more likely to trust the agent that had been established as reliable in the history phase. In the test phase’s ask and endorse trials, children showed a clear preference for asking and endorsing the reliable agent’s labels over those of the unreliable agent.

Notably, however, in the reliable-both condition (where both agents were reliable), the robot was more likely to be selected by the children. This suggests that even when both the human and robot were reliable, children showed a preference for the robot.

Age also played a significant role in trust decisions. Older children showed an increasing preference for humans, especially in the condition where the human was reliable. However, younger children displayed a stronger preference for the robot.

In the preference phase, children’s social attitudes further reflected a general favorability towards robots. They were more likely to choose the robot for sharing secrets, being friends, and as teachers, particularly in the reliable-robot condition. This preference extended to perceiving the robot as smarter and more deliberate in its actions. When asked who made mistakes, children in the reliable-robot condition were more likely to attribute errors to the human, suggesting that they saw the robot as more competent.

These results challenge the assumption that children inherently prefer human informants over robots. Instead, they suggest that children are willing to trust robots, especially when these robots have demonstrated reliability. This willingness to trust robots over humans has significant implications for how robots and other technological agents might be integrated into educational and developmental contexts for children.

While this study provides valuable insights, it has limitations to consider. The online nature of the study and the use of videos instead of live interactions may not fully capture the nuances of child-robot interactions. Replicating the study in a real-life setting could provide more accurate results. Additionally, the novelty effect—where children’s high initial interest in robots might bias their responses—should be considered. Long-term studies could help determine if children’s trust in robots persists over time.

The study, “When is it right for a robot to be wrong? Children trust a robot over a human in a selective trust task,” was authored by Rebecca Stower, Arvid Kappas, and Kristyn Sommer.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Bullshit is deemed more credible if attributed to a scientist, compared to a spiritual guru
Social Psychology

Scientists who relocate more often start Nobel research up to two years earlier

July 8, 2025

A new study of Nobel Prize winners suggests that scientists who change locations or work in multiple places tend to begin their groundbreaking research earlier, highlighting how exposure to diverse environments may help spark innovative, high-impact ideas.

Read moreDetails
The most popular dementia videos on TikTok tend to have the lowest quality, study find
Addiction

People with short-video addiction show altered brain responses during decision-making

July 8, 2025

People who frequently use short-video apps like TikTok may show reduced loss sensitivity and impulsive decision-making, according to a new neuroimaging study that links addictive use patterns to changes in brain activity during risky choices.

Read moreDetails
People with psychopathic traits fail to learn from painful outcomes
Narcissism

National narcissism linked to emotional impairments and dehumanization, new study finds

July 7, 2025

A new study suggests that people who see their nation as uniquely important often struggle with recognizing emotions and experience more anger and contempt—factors that may help explain why they’re more likely to dehumanize both outsiders and fellow citizens.

Read moreDetails
Anxious and avoidant attachment are elevated among individuals with eating disorders
Developmental Psychology

Personality may be a key factor connecting negative parenting experiences to adult challenges

July 7, 2025

New research finds a link between how adults recall being parented and their current life difficulties. These challenges may be partly explained by personality traits, such as lower conscientiousness, that are connected to early family environments and adult well-being.

Read moreDetails
Positive attitudes toward AI linked to problematic social media use
Artificial Intelligence

Positive attitudes toward AI linked to problematic social media use

July 7, 2025

A new study suggests that people who view artificial intelligence positively may be more likely to overuse social media. The findings highlight a potential link between attitudes toward AI and problematic online behavior, especially among male users.

Read moreDetails
Loneliness predicts an increase in TV viewing for older women, but not for men
Sexism

New study finds link between sexism and denial of male victimhood in relationships

July 6, 2025

New research shows that many people endorse myths that minimize abuse against men in relationships. These myths are closely tied to sexist attitudes about masculinity, gender roles, and who is believed to be a “real” victim of violence.

Read moreDetails
Fascinating study reveals how Trump’s moral rhetoric diverges from common Republican language
Donald Trump

Viral AI-images highlight how Trump engages in “victimcould,” scholar argues

July 6, 2025

How can one of the world's most powerful men also be its biggest victim? A new paper argues it’s a political strategy based on hypothetical, not actual, harm—a concept the author calls “victimcould” used to justify present-day aggression.

Read moreDetails
Stress disrupts gut and brain barriers by reducing key microbial metabolites, study finds
Narcissism

How to protect your mental health from a passive-aggressive narcissist

July 5, 2025

Passive aggression is more than just frustrating; it’s a weapon. When someone consistently uses backhanded compliments, sabotage, or the silent treatment, you may be dealing with a narcissist. Here’s how to spot the signs and protect your mental wellbeing.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Prenatal exposure to “forever chemicals” linked to autistic traits in children, study finds

Ketamine repairs reward circuitry to reverse stress-induced anhedonia

Neuroscientists decode how people juggle multiple items in working memory

Inside the bored brain: Unlocking the power of the default mode network

Choline imbalance in the brain linked to with cognitive symptoms in young depression patients

Scientists who relocate more often start Nobel research up to two years earlier

Sedentary time linked to faster brain aging in older adults, study finds

People with short-video addiction show altered brain responses during decision-making

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy