Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology Donald Trump

Trump’s presidency coincided with a rise in extreme mental distress among LGBT people, according to a massive new study

by Eric W. Dolan
September 25, 2021
in Donald Trump
Donald Trump speaking during a Turning Point Action event in 2020. (Photo credit: Gage Skidmore)

Donald Trump speaking during a Turning Point Action event in 2020. (Photo credit: Gage Skidmore)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Stay informed on the latest psychology and neuroscience research—follow PsyPost on LinkedIn for daily updates and insights.

Extreme mental distress among LGBT people increased during Donald Trump’s political rise and presidency, according to new research published in the journal Economics & Human Biology.

Trump became the Republican Party’s presidential nominee in July 2016 and that same month he selected conservative Christian politician Mike Pence as his running mate. During his administration, Trump opposed legislation that sought to prevent discrimination against LGBT people by adding sexual orientation and gender identity to federal civil rights law.

“I was curious to know whether the average mental health among LGBT people worsened during the Trump presidency, as he and his administration were perceived as anti-LGBT,” said study author Masanori Kuroki, an associate professor of economics at Arkansas Tech University.

For his study, Kuroki examined data collected from 2014 to early 2020 by the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), an annual survey conducted by The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to gather information about risk factors and behaviors among adults. About 450,000 adults are interviewed each year, providing Kuroki with a sample size of approximately 1.06 million American adults.

The survey asked the respondents to indicate how many days during the past 30 days they considered their mental health to be “not good.” Those who gave the answer 30 were considered as experiencing extreme mental distress.

The researchers found that LGBT people were more likely than non-LGBT people to report extreme mental distress even before Trump’s presidency. But Kuroki observed “a marked increase” in extreme mental distress among LGBT people starting in early 2016. The findings suggest that “the Trump administration possibly adversely affected mental health among LGBT people,” Kuroki told PsyPost.

In 2014, the proportion of adults suffering from extreme mental distress was 7.7% for LGBT individuals and 4.8% for non-LGBT individuals. By 2019, that proportion had increased to about 12% for LGBT adults, while the proportion for non-LGBT adults remained at about 5%. Moreover, the researchers found that LGBT people in states where Trump won experienced a larger increase in extreme mental distress compared to LGBT people living in states where Trump lost to Hillary Clinton.

“Before he became President of the United States, Trump was widely considered as an anti-LGBT presidential candidate, who would roll back critical legal protections if he was elected president. Since taking office, the Trump administration adopted a broad anti-LGBT agenda that threatened the rights of LGBT people,” Kuroki wrote in his study.

“Based on the hypothesis that anti-LGBT sentiments and policies might have led to higher levels of mental distress among LGBT people, this study has examined whether exceptional levels of mental distress have become more common among LGBT people, relative to non-LGBT people, following Trump’s ascendance to the presidency in early 2016. The results indeed revealed a concerning rise in poor mental health among LGBT people after Trump’s presidency became a real possibility.”

But the BRFSS collects cross-sectional, rather than longitudinal, data. In other words, the survey acquires a new sample of individuals every year, rather than repeatedly questioning the same individuals over time. This limits the ability to draw conclusions about cause and effect. “The finding is not causal, and we cannot confidently attribute the rise in mental distress among LGBT to Trump or his administration,” Kuroki said.

Kuroki believes that future research should examine whether the mental health of LGBT people improves under the new Biden administration.

“In contrast to the Trump administration, the Biden administration has already signaled that protecting the rights of LGBT people is important,” Kuroki wrote. “… If presidents affect LGBT people’s mental health, then we should expect that the extreme mental distress gap between LGBT people and non-LGBT people to narrow under the Biden presidency.”

The study, “The rise in extreme mental distress among LGBT people during Trump’s rise and presidency“, was published online June 23, 2021.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Trump’s election fraud allegations linked to temporary decline in voter turnout
Donald Trump

Trump assassination attempt lowered Republican support for violence and boosted party unity

February 17, 2025

The attempted assassination of Trump didn’t ignite partisan fury—instead, Republicans became less supportive of political violence and more united, while Democrats’ attitudes remained unchanged.

Read moreDetails
The power of the point: The science of Donald Trump’s gestures
Donald Trump

The power of the point: The science of Donald Trump’s gestures

February 6, 2025

Ever noticed Donald Trump's frequent pointing? A new linguistic study reveals it's not just random.

Read moreDetails
Victimhood and Trump’s Big Lie: New study links white grievance to election skepticism
Dark Triad

Donald Trump viewed as higher in Dark Tetrad traits than Joe Biden, study finds

February 5, 2025

A study on the 2020 U.S. election examined how perceived dark tetrad traits (Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy, sadism) in Trump and Biden influenced voter behavior. Perceptions varied by political affiliation and impacted candidate support, with psychopathy and sadism decreasing it.

Read moreDetails
Identity fusion with Trump reinforced his election fraud claims and narratives of victimhood
Donald Trump

Identity fusion with Trump reinforced his election fraud claims and narratives of victimhood

January 29, 2025

Trump supporters with strong personal loyalty (identity fusion) were more likely to believe his election fraud claims, which further deepened their loyalty and led to greater support for his policies and dismissal of his legal troubles.

Read moreDetails
The psychological puzzle of Donald Trump: Eye-opening findings from 20 studies
Donald Trump

The psychological puzzle of Donald Trump: Eye-opening findings from 20 studies

January 20, 2025

Donald Trump's unexpected rise to the presidency in 2016 defied conventional political norms, driven by his populist appeal and unique communication style, which has since become a focal point for research into the psychological and social factors behind his supporters' loyalty.

Read moreDetails
January 6 quasi-experiment reveals limited impact of anti-democratic actions on Republican Party loyalty
Donald Trump

Donald Trump’s tweets predicted bursts of violence during January 6 Capitol riot, study finds

January 5, 2025

A new study has found that Trump's tweets and rally speech strongly correlated with escalating violence during the Capitol riot, with feedback loops between online rhetoric and on-the-ground aggression amplifying both the severity and duration of violent actions.

Read moreDetails
Artificial intelligence reveals Trump’s language as both uniquely simplistic and divisive among U.S. presidents
Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence reveals Trump’s language as both uniquely simplistic and divisive among U.S. presidents

October 31, 2024

Donald Trump’s speech is uniquely distinct and divisive among modern presidents, marked by shorter, simpler sentences and frequent antagonistic language, especially toward opponents, setting his rhetorical style apart from both Republican and Democratic predecessors.

Read moreDetails
A rare event in Alabama suggests Trump’s MAGA movement can overpower incumbency effects
Donald Trump

A rare event in Alabama suggests Trump’s MAGA movement can overpower incumbency effects

October 30, 2024

A new study has found that in Alabama’s rare incumbent-versus-incumbent GOP primary, alignment with Trump’s MAGA movement outweighed traditional incumbency advantages, leading to a narrow win for the more MAGA-aligned candidate.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Psilocybin use has surged in the United States since 2019

Knowledge isn’t enough: What really predicts condom use in teens

Schizophrenia may accelerate brain ageing, new study finds

New study uncovers an intriguing liver–brain connection

Parental warmth—not poverty or danger—predicts positive world beliefs in adulthood

Diets high in fat and sugar appear to harm cognitive function

Little-known psychedelic drug shows promise in treating low motivation in depression

AI-driven brain training reduces impulsiveness in kids with ADHD, study finds

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy