Recent research has found that both IQ and genetic markers can predict political leanings towards liberalism and lower authoritarianism, suggesting our political views may be partly wired in our DNA.
Uncertainty about immigration amplifies nationalist attitudes among Portuguese citizens, predominantly driven by economic rather than cultural concerns. This perception of threat strengthens support for anti-immigration policies.
A recent study found that increased parasocial interactions with Donald Trump, where viewers form one-sided relationships with him as a media persona, correlate with more negative attitudes towards the former president.
A recent study found right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation have significant genetic underpinnings. The findings highlight the genetic influence on ideological attitudes.
Individuals, regardless of moderate political beliefs, judge opponents as less moral, even when treated fairly or kindly, underscoring deep political polarization in the United States.
New research finds that consumer confidence and willingness to spend significantly increase when the political party they support is in power. This effect is particularly pronounced following presidential elections that lead to a change in governing parties.
A study on the January 6 insurrection's impact found that despite its severity, Republican Party support only slightly decreased, rebounding quickly. This suggests that many voters prioritize partisanship over democratic norms.
New findings indicate that increased perceptions of societal polarization and negative encounters with opposing political expressions significantly heightened individuals' moral convictions on key issues.
A new study introduces a tool to measure "woke" attitudes, revealing a correlation with heightened anxiety and depression. These attitudes are less prevalent than assumed, with gender and political affiliation playing significant roles.
A study found that while all Americans view disruptive protests negatively, white people feel stronger about it. Yet, paradoxically, such tactics boost white people's views of BLM's effectiveness. Black Americans' support for BLM remains unchanged by protest tactics.
A new study reveals many Americans struggle to distinguish fact from opinion, critical for navigating political information. The findings have profound implications for civic discourse and the democratic process.
A study on the 2020 U.S. election revealed a partisan gap in democratic satisfaction, with declines among Republicans and rises among Democrats. Perceptions of electoral legitimacy and media fairness were found to fully account for this gap.
A German study of 2,133 candidates found those with aversive traits like psychopathy and spitefulness more often used positive campaigning. Despite the negative connotations of such personalities, they're inclined to highlight their achievements, suggesting a strategic self-promotion in politics.
Politicians' attachment styles and state culture predict bipartisan behavior, according to new research. Avoidantly attached politicians are more likely to cross party lines, while anxiously attached ones and those from culturally tighter states show less bipartisanship.
A study revealed brands supporting BLM on social media faced consumer backlash, resulting in decreased follower growth and increased negative comments. The effect was intensified by self-promotional content, highlighting the importance of authentic engagement in social activism.