Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Cognitive Science

It’s all in the eyes: Women and men really do see things differently

by Queen Mary University of London
November 28, 2016
in Cognitive Science
Photo credit: Zach Dischner

Photo credit: Zach Dischner

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Don't miss out! Follow PsyPost on Bluesky!

Women and men look at faces and absorb visual information in different ways, which suggests there is a gender difference in understanding visual cues, according to a team of scientists that included psychologists from Queen Mary University of London (QMUL).

The researchers used an eye tracking device on almost 500 participants at the Science Museum over a five-week period to monitor and judge how much eye contact they felt comfortable with while looking at a face on a computer screen.

They found that women looked more at the left-hand side of faces and had a strong left eye bias, but that they also explored the face much more than men. The team observed that it was possible to tell the gender of the participant based on the scanning pattern of how they looked at the face with nearly 80 per cent accuracy. Given the very large sample size the researchers suggest this is not due to chance.

Lead author Dr Antoine Coutrot from QMUL’s School of Biological and Chemical Sciences said: “This study is the first demonstration of a clear gender difference in how men and women look at faces.

“We are able to establish the gender of the participant based on how they scan the actors’ face, and can eliminate that it isn’t based on the culture of the participant as nearly 60 nationalities have been tested. We can also eliminate any other observable characteristics like perceived attractiveness or trustworthiness.”

The participants were asked to judge how comfortable the amount of eye contact they made with the actor in a Skype-like scenario. Each participant saw the same actor (there were eight in total) during the testing period, which was around 15 minutes. At the end of the session the researchers collected personality information about the participants through questionnaires.

Co-author Dr Isabelle Mareschal also from QMUL’s School of Biological and Chemical Sciences added: “There are numerous claims in popular culture that women and men look at things differently – this is the first demonstration, using eye tracking, to support this claim that they take in visual information in different ways.”

The team describe their findings in the Journal of Vision and suggest the gender difference in scanning visual information might impact many research fields, such as autism diagnosis or even everyday behaviours like watching a movie or looking at the road while driving.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

These common sounds can impair your learning, according to new psychology research
Cognitive Science

These common sounds can impair your learning, according to new psychology research

July 4, 2025

Your brain’s ancient defense system might be sabotaging your test scores. New research suggests our "behavioral immune system," which makes us subconsciously alert to signs of illness, can be triggered by coughs and sniffles.

Read moreDetails
From fireflies to brain cells: Unraveling the complex web of synchrony in networks
Addiction

Understanding “neuronal ensembles” could revolutionize addiction treatment

July 3, 2025

The same brain system that rewards you for a delicious meal is hijacked by drugs like fentanyl. A behavioral neuroscientist explains how understanding the specific memories behind these rewards is the key to treating addiction without harming our essential survival instincts.

Read moreDetails
Scientists just uncovered a surprising illusion in how we remember time
Memory

Scientists just uncovered a surprising illusion in how we remember time

July 3, 2025

Our perception of time is more fragile than we think. Scientists have uncovered a powerful illusion where repeated exposure to information makes us misremember it as happening much further in the past, significantly distorting our mental timelines.

Read moreDetails
Peppermint tea boosts memory and attention—but why?
Cognitive Science

Peppermint tea boosts memory and attention—but why?

July 2, 2025

Can a cup of peppermint tea sharpen your mind? A new study suggests it can—but not in the way scientists expected. Improved memory and attention followed the tea, but increased brain blood flow wasn't the reason why.

Read moreDetails
Scientists reveal ChatGPT’s left-wing bias — and how to “jailbreak” it
Artificial Intelligence

ChatGPT and “cognitive debt”: New study suggests AI might be hurting your brain’s ability to think

July 1, 2025

Researchers at MIT investigated how writing with ChatGPT affects brain activity and recall. Their findings indicate that reliance on AI may lead to reduced mental engagement, prompting concerns about cognitive “offloading” and its implications for education.

Read moreDetails
New psychology study sheds light on mysterious “feelings of presence” during isolation
Cognitive Science

Vagus nerve signals influence food intake more in higher socio-economic groups

July 1, 2025

Researchers have found that internal physiological cues—like signals from the vagus nerve—play a stronger role in guiding eating behavior among wealthier individuals, offering new insight into why socio-economic status is linked to differences in diet and health.

Read moreDetails
Researchers identify neural mechanism behind memory prioritization
Memory

Researchers identify neural mechanism behind memory prioritization

June 30, 2025

A new brain imaging study shows that when people try to remember multiple things, their brains give more precise attention to the most important item. The frontal cortex helps allocate memory resources, boosting accuracy for high-priority information.

Read moreDetails
Scientists show how you’re unknowingly sealing yourself in an information bubble
Cognitive Science

Scientists show how you’re unknowingly sealing yourself in an information bubble

June 29, 2025

Scientists have found that belief polarization doesn’t always come from misinformation or social media bubbles. Instead, it often begins with a simple search. Our choice of words—and the algorithm’s response—can subtly seal us inside our own informational comfort zones.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Othello syndrome: Woman’s rare stroke leads to psychotic delusions of infidelity

How to protect your mental health from a passive-aggressive narcissist

Dark personality traits linked to generative AI use among art students

Scientists are uncovering more and more unsettling facts about our politics

People with depression face significantly greater social and health-related challenges

Stress disrupts gut and brain barriers by reducing key microbial metabolites, study finds

New research reveals hidden biases in AI’s moral advice

7 subtle signs you are being love bombed—and how to slow things down before you get hurt

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy