Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

High-ranked women less generous than men when sharing a reward with their collaborators

by Eric W. Dolan
October 10, 2017
in Social Psychology
(Photo credit: michaeljung)

(Photo credit: michaeljung)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Don't miss out! Follow PsyPost on Bluesky!

High status men are more willing to reward their collaborators than are high status women, according to new research.

The study, published in PLOS One, found that high-ranked men were more generous when sharing a reward with people they worked with.

“From early in childhood, girls form relationships with same-sex peers of equal status more than boys do, whereas boys are more willing to cooperate with same-sex peers of differing status levels. This occurs both in language use and cooperative activities,” explained study authors Joyce Benenson and Henry Markovits, of Emmanuel College and the Université du Québec à Montréal, respectively.

“In our Current Biology (2014) article, we tested this with adults in 50 Psychology departments in the US and Canada. Again, we found that male full professors were more likely than female full professors to cooperate with assistant professors of the same sex.

“Female full professors however were just as likely as male full professors to cooperate with same-sex full professors,” the researchers told PsyPost. “We wondered, however, whether this was due to institutional pressures or some kind of socialization. Therefore, we wanted to replicate these more naturalistic findings with a controlled standardized test.”

“There have been a number of references to the ‘Queen Bee’ phenomenon, but no test of sex differences. And men are well known to be tyrannical bosses and, of course, to take advantage of and discriminate against women. The obvious question then is to what extent can newcomer females can depend on senior females to help them advance in a field.”

In three studies of 187 male and 188 female participants, the researchers found that high status men were more invested in a cooperative partner than high status women.

In the first study, the participants were told they were either the most or least influential person in a group. They were then asked how much of a hypothetical reward they would share with a cooperative partner of varying competence.

The second and third studies replaced the hypothetical reward with a small monetary reward. The participants were told they were the leader of the group and had to allocate the rewards they earned to their partners. In all of the experiments, the participants’ partners were of the same sex.

Across all studies, high status men shared more rewards with their partners, while high status women tended to to retain a larger share for themselves.

“Women need to learn to be more generous with lower-ranked females,” Benenson and Markovits said. “These young people in our study who were not influenced by a particular institutional culture nevertheless exhibited the same sex-differentiated patterns that have been found before. This suggests that female newcomers are at a disadvantage if they rely on higher-ranked females to get ahead compared to male newcomers.”

“This is the first study of which we are aware that experimentally demonstrates that higher-ranked females are less likely than higher-ranked same-sex peers to cooperate with lower-ranked same-sex peers.”

But the study does have some limitations.

“Our study is very limited in that the setting is completely experimental and artificial and no other same-sex peer was present,” the researchers explained. “More research in real settings needs to be conducted. If the results are replicated, it behooves human resources professionals to make female leaders and other high-ranked female professionals more aware of this bias.”

The findings also suggest that men have a natural inclination to strengthen group bonds, something which could help them succeed in hierarchical organizations.

“We really believe that we need females to work together to contribute their unique perspectives to the world,” Benenson and Markovits told PsyPost. “This requires more high status females in important positions and more collaboration among females. Many of the world’s problems today are being ignored and males’ interests in warfare, making large sums of money, playing politics are overshadowing females’ greater interests in the health of individuals and the environment.”

The study, “High status males invest more than high status females in lower status same-sex collaborators“, was also co-authored by Evelyne Gauthier and Émilie Gagnon-St-Pierre.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

New research reveals aging shifts gender stereotypes in unexpected ways
Sexism

New research reveals aging shifts gender stereotypes in unexpected ways

May 19, 2025

A new meta-analysis challenges the idea that older women face “double jeopardy” due to age and gender. While younger and middle-aged women are viewed more positively than men, perceptions of older women and men appear to converge in later life.

Read moreDetails
New study upends decades-old narrative about Democrats and the white working class
Political Psychology

New study upends decades-old narrative about Democrats and the white working class

May 17, 2025

A new analysis disrupts decades of conventional wisdom: the white working class was not a reliable Democratic base in the postwar era. Instead, support for Republicans has been a longstanding trend dating back to the 1940s.

Read moreDetails
Surprisingly strong link found between neighborhood greenness and police shootings
Social Psychology

Surprisingly strong link found between neighborhood greenness and police shootings

May 15, 2025

A new nationwide study suggests that U.S. counties with more green space experience fewer fatal police shootings. The effect was strongest in urban and socioeconomically deprived areas, highlighting the potential public safety benefits of greener environments.

Read moreDetails
Political diversity in your social circle might come with a surprising trade-off
Political Psychology

Political diversity in your social circle might come with a surprising trade-off

May 14, 2025

People with politically mixed social circles may trust more of what they see on social media, including misinformation. A new study highlights an unexpected relationship between network diversity and belief in political content—true or false.

Read moreDetails
Twitter polls exhibit large pro-Trump bias — but these researchers have a fix
Political Psychology

Sharing false information online boosts visibility for Republican legislators, study finds

May 13, 2025

A new study reveals that U.S. state legislators who posted false or inflammatory content during times of political turmoil sometimes gained online visibility—especially Republicans spreading low-credibility claims. But uncivil language often had the opposite effect, particularly for extremists.

Read moreDetails
Left-wing authoritarians are less likely to support physically strong men as leaders
Authoritarianism

Left-wing authoritarians are less likely to support physically strong men as leaders

May 12, 2025

Do muscles make a man a better leader? That depends on your politics. A new study finds conservatives are drawn to strong men in leadership roles, while left-wing authoritarians are more likely to shy away from physical dominance.

Read moreDetails
Do you call your partner your best friend? This study says you’re in the minority
Relationships and Sexual Health

Do you call your partner your best friend? This study says you’re in the minority

May 11, 2025

A large study suggests that most people separate romantic and platonic bonds. While some do see their partner as a best friend, the emotional benefits of doing so vary by age, income, and relationship type.

Read moreDetails
New study sheds light on how personality, power, and identity shape relationship satisfaction
Relationships and Sexual Health

New study sheds light on how personality, power, and identity shape relationship satisfaction

May 9, 2025

Personality traits and perceived power don’t operate the same way in every relationship. A new study suggests that identity and relationship context change how these factors influence satisfaction, challenging long-held assumptions about what makes romantic partnerships work.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Where you flirt matters: New research shows setting shapes romantic success

Psychedelic’s anti-anxiety effects can be separated from hallucinations by targeting specific brain circuits

New research reveals aging shifts gender stereotypes in unexpected ways

Optimistic individuals are more likely to respond to SSRI antidepressants

Brain oscillations reveal dynamic shifts in creative thought during metaphor generation

Surprisingly widespread brain activity supports economic decision-making, new study finds

Scientists finds altered attention-related brain connectivity in youth with anxiety

From fixed pulses to smart stimulation: Parkinson’s treatment takes a leap forward

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy