What millions of voter records reveal about political independents

Voters who do not align with the Democratic or Republican parties make up the largest portion of the American electorate, yet their actual political views are frequently misunderstood. Research published in American Politics Research shows that most independent voters hold moderate ideologies and desire a system focused on open-mindedness rather than rigid political labels. The findings suggest that these individuals are an active, distinct segment of the voting public wanting better representation, rather than simply apathetic citizens or disguised partisans.

Political polarization between the two major parties has led to a growing number of Americans identifying as independents. Recent polling indicates that over forty percent of the country prefers not to belong to either major American political party. Many of these voters end up blocked from basic steps of the political process, such as closed primary elections. In nearly half the country, residents who decline to choose a political party are legally prevented from voting in those early races.

Scholars debate what it actually means to be an independent in modern politics. Some early political theory treated unaffiliated individuals as voters lacking political knowledge who merely ignore national issues. Under this historical framework, an independent label signaled a deficit of civic engagement rather than a meaningful personal ideology.

Other experts have argued that independents are essentially partisan voters who hide their actual party preference. Under this perspective, individuals conceal their political leanings to avoid the social stigma associated with toxic political arguments. By remaining undercover, these voters preserve a neutral public image while quietly voting along strict party lines on election day.

A third perspective views independent registration as a choice based on systematic frustration. This framework argues that voters reject party labels because they actively distrust the two-party system itself. These individuals might hold a variety of personal convictions, but they are united by a generalized opposition to the current institutional structure of American voting.

Free daily newsletter

To test these competing ideas, political scientists Eveline Dowling of the University of California, Davis, Nathan K. Micatka of the University of South Alabama, and Caroline Tolbert of the University of Iowa conducted a two-part investigation. They sought to discover if independents are genuinely moderate in their political beliefs. They also wanted to see how the broader public perceives these voters.

The researchers first analyzed information from an administrative voter database known as Catalist to map the demographics of unaffiliated voters. They reviewed random samples of the total adult population in the United States from 2020, 2022, and 2023. This massive study involved over seven and a half million individual data points. The files combined official state voting records with commercial information and campaign estimates to capture the entire adult population.

This approach allowed the team to bypass problems common in standard public opinion polls. Telephone surveys often overrepresent the most active and engaged citizens, leaving out the quiet middle of the electorate. The researchers used a synthetic partisanship score provided by the database vendor to identify individuals who sit midway between the strong Democratic and strong Republican sides of the spectrum.

The Catalist data revealed that independent voters differ from the general population in pronounced ways. People categorized as independent were consistently younger than those affiliated with major parties. Specifically, citizens between the ages of twenty-five and thirty-nine were the most likely to avoid a party label. Unaffiliated adults were also notably less likely to have earned a college degree compared to the general public.

The most defining characteristic from the voter files concerned their political ideology. Well over half of the independent individuals registered as moderate in their political beliefs across the three time periods evaluated. In both 2020 and 2022, the modeled data showed that more than nine out of ten independent voters were ideological moderates. This finding challenges the notion that most independents are just secretive extremists or highly partisan voters.

For the second part of their project, the scientists analyzed results from the 2022 Collaborative Midterm Survey. This large study included roughly nineteen thousand five hundred valid responses from adults across the entire country. Participants answered questions regarding how they viewed people who do not affiliate with either of the two major parties.

The survey revealed that a majority of Americans believe independents are eager to work across party lines. The public also tended to view these unaligned voters as people willing to consider opposing viewpoints. Both Democrats and Republicans reported generally favorable attributes when asked to describe independent voters, showing that mainstream partisans do not view them entirely negatively. Highly educated citizens were especially prone to assigning positive traits to the unaffiliated public.

Strong partisans frequently viewed independents as strategic bridge builders who could help politicians reach compromises. They saw the unaffiliated segment as a potential mediating force capable of cooling down political conflict. The independent voters themselves, however, focused more on the specific value of open-mindedness compared to regular party members. These individual voters highly valued representation that accurately reflects their unique perspectives.

Independents strongly supported statements indicating that unaffiliated voters represent views ignored by the two main organizations. They placed a high priority on having a flexible political identity that sidesteps strict partisan labels. Many felt that no individual should be forced to adopt a party label simply to cast a ballot in the United States.

Independent leaners, who identify as unaffiliated but tend to vote for one specific side, were extremely likely to support an unconstrained political system. These leaners consistently rated the ability to consider opposing viewpoints as the defining trait of an independent. This desire for perspective-taking was especially strong among those who lightly lean toward the Democratic party.

The authors note a few limitations to their research. The administrative voter files use probabilistic models created by a vendor, which means the ideology scores are estimates rather than direct self-reported surveys. In addition, checking a box as an unaffiliated voter on a state registration form might involve different psychological motivations than telling a pollster you identify as an independent. These measures do not fully capture the emotional fervor involved in making that choice.

The statements evaluated in the national survey also represent a limited look at human psychology. The data captured identity and social dimensions, but the survey omitted questions regarding broad political trust or the desire for sweeping institutional reform. The authors suggest that exploring these missing factors would be a productive avenue for future research. Follow-up studies could assess how these unaffiliated voters view ranked voting or nonpartisan redistricting.

Despite these boundaries, the combined results present a distinct demographic contour of a misunderstood group. Independents typically show lower participation rates in national elections compared to dedicated partisans. Recognizing that this low turnout might stem from an authentic desire for moderate, flexible politics could influence the way local primary elections are structured. Better rules might bring millions of these quiet moderates back to the ballot box.

If independent voters are genuinely moderate and heavily favor compromise, expanding their legal right to vote in primaries might alter the entire political landscape. Institutional reforms that grant unaffiliated individuals better ballot access could theoretically reward more moderate politicians. Understanding exactly who these unaligned voters are provides a foundation for any future efforts aiming to reduce the hostility in American politics.

The study, “Who Are Independents? Are They Moderate in Political Ideology?,” was authored by Eveline Dowling, Nathan K. Micatka, and Caroline Tolbert.