PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Men and women differ in how they imagine an opposite-sex friend

by Eric W. Dolan
October 25, 2016
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Photo credit: Nathan Rupert

Photo credit: Nathan Rupert

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

A new study has found that men and women’s actual day-to-day experience with opposite-sex friends differs from what comes to mind when they think of an opposite-sex friend.

The study in Evolutionary Psychological Science found that men were more likely to think of an opposite-sex friend as “a member of the opposite sex to whom I am attracted and would pursue given the opportunity” while women were more likely to think of them as simply “a friend of the opposite sex.”

But the researchers found a different result when they approached students at a university who were accompanied by an opposite-sex friend — and then separated the duo to examine their perceptions of one another. They discovered that male and female friends’ attraction to one another varied widely.

PsyPost interviewed the study’s corresponding author, April Bleske-Rechek of the University of Wisconsin at Eau Claire. Read her responses below:

Why were you interested in this topic?

Bleske-Rechek: I have been interested in both same-sex and opposite-sex friendships, and close relationships of any kind, actually, since well before graduate school. In graduate school, my advisor (David Buss) and I began studying friendship with an evolutionary lens, and hence we began to consider the ways in which our evolved mating strategies might impinge on our experiences with opposite-sex friends.

We did that because, defined as a voluntary, non-reproductive alliance between non-genetically related members of the opposite sex, these relationships — at least among young adults — seem to be a bit of an evolutionary novelty.

What should the average person take away from your study?

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

The current set of studies, taken as an aggregate, supports my general hypothesis that young adult heterosexual men and women, on average, have somewhat different mental definitions (or characterizations) of “opposite-sex friend.” When men and women think of an opposite-sex friend, men are more likely than women to think of a friend to whom they are attracted.

Are there any major caveats? What questions still need to be addressed?

So many questions remain. First, the hypothesis above needs to be tested in multiple ways, so my conclusion is very tentative. At the least, I think we can conclude that the opposite-sex “friend” who comes to a given person’s mind when someone asks them about friends might not be the same “opposite-sex friend” they hang out with at any given time of the day. This issue does not happen with romantic partners! If I ask people to tell me about a romantic partner of theirs, I can be reasonably confident they are going to tell me about their current romantic partner because most people have one partner at a time (multiple sex partners perhaps but usually serial monogamy with romantic partners.)

I am trying to figure out whether male and female friendship partners send signals that match their stated intentions or desires (because they may not be aware of their desires). Students and I are currently beginning a study of young adult male-female dyads in which outside judges observe each dyad for 90 seconds and attempt to determine whether they are romantically involved or “just friends” (or somewhere in between). After each observation, dyad members are separated and questioned about their relationship and their attraction to one another. The point is to try to figure out whether opposite-sex friends tend to send nonverbal cues of being romantically involved (even when they are not), and whether men or women tend to send off those cues more often.

The study, “Sex Differences in Young Adults’ Attraction to Opposite-Sex Friends: Natural Sampling versus Mental Concepts,” was co-authored by Whitney E. Joseph, Heather Williquette and Bryan Donovan.

RELATED

Liberals hesitate to share progressive causes framed with conservative moral language
Political Psychology

Political loser perceptions alter white American views on wealth distribution

May 18, 2026
Liberals hesitate to share progressive causes framed with conservative moral language
Psychopathy

Brain wave monitoring reveals how psychopathic traits disrupt trust and reward in social scenarios

May 18, 2026
Liberals hesitate to share progressive causes framed with conservative moral language
Relationships and Sexual Health

Psychologists identify a key reason conversations with your partner might be turning negative

May 18, 2026
Liberals hesitate to share progressive causes framed with conservative moral language
Political Psychology

Liberals hesitate to share progressive causes framed with conservative moral language

May 18, 2026
Cognitive issues in ADHD and learning difficulties appear to have different roots
Sleep

Poor sleep and endless video scrolling form a predictable behavioral loop

May 17, 2026
Religion and psychedelics weaken link between risky behavior and violence
Political Psychology

How racial resentment relates to political conservatism across different White religious groups

May 17, 2026
A rare event in Alabama suggests Trump’s MAGA movement can overpower incumbency effects
Political Psychology

Four decades of data show high-status voters, not the working class, are reshaping American politics

May 16, 2026
New psychology research sheds light on the dark side of intimate touch
Social Psychology

Updating Wikipedia pages boosts public trust in scientific organizations, study finds

May 16, 2026

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader. We also syndicate to Apple News.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Liberals hesitate to share progressive causes framed with conservative moral language
  • A simple at-home sexual fantasy exercise increases pleasure and reduces distress
  • Feeling empty after finishing a video game? Researchers say post-game depression is a real phenomenon
  • Intelligence makes people more trusting, but early hardship cuts this benefit in half
  • A classic psychology study on the calming effects of nature just got a massive update

Science of Money

  • How AI is rewriting the marketer’s playbook, according to a wide-ranging literature review
  • When a CEO’s foreign accent becomes an asset: What investors actually hear
  • Congressional stock trades look a lot like retail investing, new study finds
  • Researchers identify a costly pattern in consumer debt repayment
  • Can GPT-4 pick stocks? A new AI framework reports market-beating returns on the S&P 100

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc