PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Mental Health

Narcissists eventually figure out they are not especially socially valued

by Michele P. Mannion
September 11, 2015
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Photo credit: Chris Lim

Photo credit: Chris Lim

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

The incidence of narcissism is generally thought to be on the rise, and recently published research sought to examine how aware narcissists may be of their social status and popularity.

In their studies, Erika Carlson and Nicole Lawless DesJardins rely on a narcissism definition from Raskin & Terry, who define grandiose narcissism as “entitlement and need for admiration, vanity, a belief that one is special, and a tendency to manipulate others.”

The authors make a distinction between social status and popularity, noting that authority and respect in the eyes of others are key considerations in social status, while being well liked best defines popularity. In explaining how narcissists may maintain status and popularity over time, three patterns emerge. A narcissist may sustain a maintenance pattern, the initial realization of status and popularity; a waning pattern describes the initial achievement of status and popularity, but then the loss of both; a null pattern involves no achievement of status or popularity.

Participants in the first study included 133 undergraduate men and women from a university located in the Midwest. Personality description of participants was provided by informant friends, with average length of acquaintance two years.  Study participants, who were not acquainted, met in small groups and provided self and peer ratings of status and popularity.  The Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI), was completed to assess overall grandiose narcissism, in addition to four specific subscales (leadership/authority; self-absorption/self-admiration; superiority/arrogance; exploitativeness/entitlement). Status was measured by participants on one scaled item: “has high status, influence or respect.” Popularity, also measured on a scaled item, measured “how much they liked group members . . . and how much they thought their group members, in general, liked them.”

As compared to participants lower in narcissism, those with higher levels reported initially attaining more status, although this was not the case for popularity. While narcissists were accurate in their perception of having higher status, they inaccurately judged themselves to be more popular, overestimating their popularity.

In a second study, Carlson and Lawless-Desjardins focused on longer term perceptions of status and popularity by examining narcissistic beliefs over a period of four months. A total of 94 participants were placed in the small, unacquainted groups, meeting once a week for 10 to 20 minutes, primarily discussing material from a psychology course focused on personality. Ratings related to status and popularity were collected three times at six week intervals. Approximately two weeks after the group began, the NPI was completed, participants described their own personality, and informant friends were nominated to describe their friends’ personality.

During these first four months of acquaintanceship, those participants higher in narcissism were more inclined toward initially attaining status, then losing their status; this lends support to the waning pattern for status. While participants were not necessarily higher in popularity, supporting the null pattern for popularity, those higher on the NPT were inclined to perceive they were more popular and over-estimated their popularity.

Of interest is the finding that narcissists seemed to comprehend their status was lost over time, since at the end of four months, they did not perceive either high or low status or popularity, and the over estimation of social value did not occur.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

A third study of 73 participants explored narcissists’ belief about those attributes which contribute to status. Results suggest that narcissists’ believe their narcissistic tendencies are of benefit, that essentially, “their narcissism gets them ahead.” This sense of getting ahead, however, is short lived and “in the long run, and eventually, they seemed to be aware that they were not especially socially valued.”

“This subjective experience likely makes first impression contexts more rewarding than later stages of acquaintanceship and might explain why they prefer short-term relationships,” the researchers said.

The study, which includes findings related to specific narcissistic personality traits and subscale items from the NPI, is published in the July issue of the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Men and women report similar levels of “duty sex,” and similar reasons behind it
  • Frequent cannabis use linked to higher odds of nighttime breathing problems
  • Young adults who fear rejection also tend to fear death more, psychology study finds
  • Your body makes its own cannabis-like chemicals as you run, and neuroscience research finds they keep rising all the way to the marathon finish line, a possible clue to the runner’s high
  • People with psychosis and a history of aggression are more likely to mistake negative emotions for positive ones

Science of Money

  • A discriminating algorithm sparks less moral outrage than a human loan officer, study finds
  • What happens to your well-being when your job becomes your calling?
  • How a boss’s psychopathic traits shape employee performance
  • Study finds Medicaid expansions prompted lenders to ease borrowing terms
  • Does remote work increase birth rates? Census data points to the opposite

Recent

  • Only about half of social science findings held up when retested, major replication project finds
  • Beautiful landscapes may briefly put the brakes on the brain’s movement system
  • Early trauma may change how children’s cortisol responses relate to anxiety and behavior problems
  • New study explores how money influences interpretations of the Bible
  • Diets high in fat and sugar are linked to impulsiveness in people with borderline personality disorder
  • A mirror trick that adds a sixth finger also changes what people think their hand can grab
  • Intelligence and fertility: Do smarter people have fewer children? The strongest evidence suggests a smaller, more complicated link
  • A strong emotional bond with a mother predicts resilience after childhood trauma
  • Men and women report similar levels of “duty sex,” and similar reasons behind it
  • Horror isn’t just intense fear, new psychology study suggests

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc