PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Relationships and Sexual Health Infidelity

New research shows how people’s romantic beliefs influence how they process celebrities’ infidelity

by Eric W. Dolan
January 14, 2023
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

New research sheds light on how audiences rely on romantic beliefs to evaluate infidelity committed by their favorite celebrities. The findings, published in the journal Psychology of Popular Media, provide insight into the nature of the relationship between romantic beliefs and parasocial relationships.

A parasocial relationship is one where people feel like they know someone even though they have never met them in real-life. People often form these one-sided relationships with celebrities and other figures in the public eye. While many studies have examined the formation of parasocial relationships, researchers have largely neglected how people’s idealized romantic beliefs influence their reactions to celebrities’ transgressions, such as infidelity.

“Infidelity is a prevalent celebrity transgression yet with very mixed fans’ reactions. Research is needed to outline the patterns of these reactions and empirically examine the rationales underlying the reactions,” said study author Mu Hu, an associate professor of communication at Texas A&M University-San Antonio.

For their study, the researchers surveyed a sample of 397 college students from five large public universities in eastern China. The participants first completed a measure of idealized romantic beliefs, where they reported the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with statements such as “I believe that to be truly in love is to be in love forever,” “I am likely to fall in love almost immediately if I meet the right person,” and “There will be only one love for me.”

The participants were then asked to name their favorite celebrities. Most participants (63%) named actors or actresses. In addition, 27% named were singers, while 4% named sports figures, 2% named television hosts, 2% named social media influencers, 2% named comedians, 1% named scholars, and just one person named a movie director. Seventy-nine participants viewed their parasocial relationship with celebrity to be romantic in nature, 153 participants viewed their parasocial relationship with the celebrity to be friendly in nature, and 165 participants categorized their parasocial relationship as “other.”

Next, the participants reported how they would feel if their favorite celebrity committed infidelity. They indicated how severe they would consider the transgression and estimated their negative emotional reaction and likelihood of forgiving the celebrity.

The researchers found that idealized romantic beliefs were positively related to perceived severity. In other words, those with more idealized romantic beliefs tended to view infidelity as a more severe transgression. Women tended to have stronger parasocial relationships compared to men. Women’s responses to celebrities’ infidelity were also more negative than men’s.

After controlling for the strength of parasocial relationships, the researchers als found were a significant interaction effect of gender and audience type. Among men, romance fans were less troubled than friendship fans by their favorite celebrities’ infidelity. Among women, romance fans were more troubled than friendship fans by their favorite celebrities’ infidelity

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

“We should understand that it is natural that people form different opinions about and have different reactions toward a certain celebrity’s infidelity scandal,” Hu told PsyPost. “This study shows that people’s romantic beliefs, how they view the celebrity (e.g., as a romantic partner, a friend, or others), and gender all play a role in how they process this type of transgression and cope with it.”

“Any study has limitations but meanwhile provides potential directions in future research,” Hu noted. “The biggest caveat of this study, in my view, is that it examined people’s expected reactions to their favorite celebrities’ infidelity but not the actual reactions since we adopted a hypothetical scenario study design (we asked the research participants to evaluate how they would respond if their favorite celebrities committed infidelity). For future directions, I believe that a cross-cultural comparison or an intercultural communication study which incorporates cultural constructs will further our understanding of this subject.”

“This study is based on a Chinese college student sample,” Hu added. “I would like to see replications of this study using samples from other cultures. Some of the key constructs involved in this study such as romantic beliefs are highly susceptible to the influence of cultural contexts.”

The study, “Whose Bed Have Your Boots Been Under? People’s Expected Responses Toward Celebrities’ Romantic Relationship Infidelity“, was authored by Mu Hu, Haijiao Xu, Shuchang Liu, and Jing Cai.

TweetSendScanShareSendPinShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • New study explores the psychological chain behind involuntary sexual thoughts
  • Narcissistic individuals are more prone to problematic use of generative AI
  • Wealth and air pollution emerge as top predictors of state autism rates
  • Scientists develop a groundbreaking vaccine that outsmarts illicit fentanyl analogs
  • Trump’s 2020 pivot on face masks changed Republican behavior but not their medical beliefs

Science of Money

  • Does admitting a message is AI-written turn customers off? A new study weighs in
  • That “helpful” gift might backfire: self-improvement presents lead to bad reviews, study finds
  • The hidden language of packaging and why shoppers grant their approval
  • Screens on shopping carts nudge shoppers to spend more, even on items that aren’t on sale
  • Personality traits and social cues both feed crypto risk-taking, researchers report

Recent

  • Scientists discover a specific brainstem circuit that triggers long-lasting anxiety
  • Genetic risk for cannabis use disorder linked to brain differences in youth
  • A suspected bout of COVID-19 left a man with half his face numb and burning
  • Shared positive humor styles predict better online dating matches
  • Do you lose your whole day to one appointment? “Waiting mode” may be why
  • Adults with ADHD who struggle to manage emotions face a higher insomnia risk
  • People in close proximity to each other synchronize their heart rates
  • Oxytocin nasal spray may help people with borderline personality disorder engage in self-compassion meditation
  • Researchers identify risk factors for addictive use of cosmetic procedures
  • Study finds societal affluence is linked to wider gender gaps in STEM graduation

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc