PsyPost
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
Join
My Account
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Relationships and Sexual Health Infidelity

New research shows how people’s romantic beliefs influence how they process celebrities’ infidelity

by Eric W. Dolan
January 14, 2023
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

New research sheds light on how audiences rely on romantic beliefs to evaluate infidelity committed by their favorite celebrities. The findings, published in the journal Psychology of Popular Media, provide insight into the nature of the relationship between romantic beliefs and parasocial relationships.

A parasocial relationship is one where people feel like they know someone even though they have never met them in real-life. People often form these one-sided relationships with celebrities and other figures in the public eye. While many studies have examined the formation of parasocial relationships, researchers have largely neglected how people’s idealized romantic beliefs influence their reactions to celebrities’ transgressions, such as infidelity.

“Infidelity is a prevalent celebrity transgression yet with very mixed fans’ reactions. Research is needed to outline the patterns of these reactions and empirically examine the rationales underlying the reactions,” said study author Mu Hu, an associate professor of communication at Texas A&M University-San Antonio.

For their study, the researchers surveyed a sample of 397 college students from five large public universities in eastern China. The participants first completed a measure of idealized romantic beliefs, where they reported the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with statements such as “I believe that to be truly in love is to be in love forever,” “I am likely to fall in love almost immediately if I meet the right person,” and “There will be only one love for me.”

The participants were then asked to name their favorite celebrities. Most participants (63%) named actors or actresses. In addition, 27% named were singers, while 4% named sports figures, 2% named television hosts, 2% named social media influencers, 2% named comedians, 1% named scholars, and just one person named a movie director. Seventy-nine participants viewed their parasocial relationship with celebrity to be romantic in nature, 153 participants viewed their parasocial relationship with the celebrity to be friendly in nature, and 165 participants categorized their parasocial relationship as “other.”

Next, the participants reported how they would feel if their favorite celebrity committed infidelity. They indicated how severe they would consider the transgression and estimated their negative emotional reaction and likelihood of forgiving the celebrity.

The researchers found that idealized romantic beliefs were positively related to perceived severity. In other words, those with more idealized romantic beliefs tended to view infidelity as a more severe transgression. Women tended to have stronger parasocial relationships compared to men. Women’s responses to celebrities’ infidelity were also more negative than men’s.

After controlling for the strength of parasocial relationships, the researchers als found were a significant interaction effect of gender and audience type. Among men, romance fans were less troubled than friendship fans by their favorite celebrities’ infidelity. Among women, romance fans were more troubled than friendship fans by their favorite celebrities’ infidelity

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

“We should understand that it is natural that people form different opinions about and have different reactions toward a certain celebrity’s infidelity scandal,” Hu told PsyPost. “This study shows that people’s romantic beliefs, how they view the celebrity (e.g., as a romantic partner, a friend, or others), and gender all play a role in how they process this type of transgression and cope with it.”

“Any study has limitations but meanwhile provides potential directions in future research,” Hu noted. “The biggest caveat of this study, in my view, is that it examined people’s expected reactions to their favorite celebrities’ infidelity but not the actual reactions since we adopted a hypothetical scenario study design (we asked the research participants to evaluate how they would respond if their favorite celebrities committed infidelity). For future directions, I believe that a cross-cultural comparison or an intercultural communication study which incorporates cultural constructs will further our understanding of this subject.”

“This study is based on a Chinese college student sample,” Hu added. “I would like to see replications of this study using samples from other cultures. Some of the key constructs involved in this study such as romantic beliefs are highly susceptible to the influence of cultural contexts.”

The study, “Whose Bed Have Your Boots Been Under? People’s Expected Responses Toward Celebrities’ Romantic Relationship Infidelity“, was authored by Mu Hu, Haijiao Xu, Shuchang Liu, and Jing Cai.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin1ShareShareShareShareShare

Follow PsyPost

The latest research, however you prefer to read it.

Daily newsletter

One email a day. The newest research, nothing else.

Google News

Get PsyPost stories in your Google News feed.

Add PsyPost to Google News
RSS feed

Use your favorite reader.

Copy RSS URL
Social media
Support independent science journalism

Ad-free reading, full archives, and weekly deep dives for members.

Become a member

Trending

  • Kindness isn’t always what it seems: The psychology of women’s competitive altruism
  • Lower cognitive ability is linked to stronger Christian nationalist views, even after accounting for education
  • Taylor Swift fans lower climate concerns to justify star’s carbon footprint
  • Why is autism increasing? Scientists are converging on an unglamorous answer
  • People with higher autistic traits tend to avoid positive relationship-maintenance tactics

Science of Money

  • Did generative AI derail the job market for recent college graduates?
  • How SNAP restrictions on soda and candy affect consumer spending
  • Can rebuilding blighted lots pay for itself? Savannah’s two-decade record suggests yes
  • The psychological trap of checking reviews after you buy
  • The hidden cost of firing your lowest performers

Recent

  • Longitudinal study highlights the enduring toll of childhood loneliness and social isolation
  • Financial and relationship worries predict bad dreams
  • The right side of the brain shows more signs of aging than the left, new study suggests
  • Gut bacteria and digestive metabolites are linked to psychopathic traits
  • “Mate-value backlash” may help explain anti-feminist attitudes among some Trump-era men, researchers say
  • Childhood trauma is linked to suicidal thoughts and attempts in adults with depression and anxiety
  • Americans’ support for political violence fell in 2026, but MAGA supporters remain the most likely to justify it
  • New study identifies four unique migraine phenotypes using artificial intelligence
  • Early-life sugar restriction tied to better mental health in adulthood
  • People found not guilty by reason of insanity show a surprisingly mixed criminal risk profile

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc