Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology Political Psychology Donald Trump

New study identifies a psychological factor linked to Trump supporters’ vindictiveness

by Eric W. Dolan
March 28, 2020
in Donald Trump
Donald Trump speaking with supporters at a campaign rally at Veterans Memorial Coliseum at the Arizona State Fairgrounds in Phoenix, Arizona. (Photo credit: Gage Skidmore)

Donald Trump speaking with supporters at a campaign rally at Veterans Memorial Coliseum at the Arizona State Fairgrounds in Phoenix, Arizona. (Photo credit: Gage Skidmore)

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Don't miss out! Follow PsyPost on Bluesky!

The desire to matter and feel significant among Donald Trump supporters is associated with support for hostile and vindictive actions against the president’s political rivals, according to new research published in the journal Political Psychology. In a series of studies conducted immediately before and after the 2016 election in the United States, the researchers examined how the quest for personal significance was related to confrontational intergroup behaviors.

“Our team studies what motivates people to support and engage in radical political actions. In the past we focused on actions — both peaceful and violent — that were aimed against the political system such as protesting, donating money for a cause, or using politically motivated violence,” explained study author Katarzyna Jaśko, an associate professor at Jagiellonian University in Poland.

“In this study we wanted to look at both sides and to explore the motivations of not only those who protest against the government but also those who support it. Our thinking was that just like some citizens contest the system and engage in aggressive actions directed against it, the government can use its power in benevolent or hostile ways and it’s important to understand whether its supporters accept it, and if so why?”

The researchers surveyed 189 supporters of Donald Trump and 305 supporters of Hillary Clinton the week preceding Election Day about how different outcomes of the election would make them feel. The participants also indicated their willingness to engage in actions against the future president and their support for hypothetical actions performed by the president against his or her political opponents.

“We asked whether they would support their elected president if, for example, he or she sued the media that criticized them, used the military to stop anti-government demonstrations, investigated political opponents’ email accounts or, in contrast, he or she demonstrated respect for their political opponents and included them in a political process,” Jaśko explained.

The researchers then repeated the study with another 217 Trump voters and 261 Clinton voters a week after the 2016 election.

“We were interested whether psychological factors such as gain of personal significance (i.e., feeling proud, strong, and important) derived from the victory of one’s political candidate or loss of personal significance (i.e., feeling humiliated, excluded, and ashamed) experienced after the defeat could predict those peaceful or aggressive reactions,” Jaśko said.

Trump supporters were more likely to approve of him taking hostile actions against his political opponents than Clinton supporters were to approve hers. The more Trump supporters thought his election would result in a gain of personal significance, the more supportive they were of his hostile actions.

The researchers also analyzed data from the Pew Research Center’s November 2016 Post-Election Survey, which included 533 Trump voters. They found that voters who indicated that the election of Trump made them feel proud were more likely to believe that he should not work with Democratic leaders to accomplish things and should stand up to Democrats even if it means less gets done in Washington.

“It means that among those who were particularly invested in supporting Donald Trump and whose individual sense of personal significance was mostly affected by the victory, his hostile actions were accepted the most,” Jaśko told PsyPost.

“In contrast, among voters of Hillary Clinton (when they were asked about it a week before the elections), expected gain of personal significance (should she be victorious) was weakly but significantly related to support for her benevolent but not hostile actions toward her opponents. Thus, Trump supporters seemed to be more vindictive in their expected (and actual) victory, whereas that was not the case for Clinton’s supporters.”

“Among the losers of elections, we found that loss of personal significance was related to greater motivation to engage in peaceful, but not violent, actions toward the government. This was true for both groups and we did not find any differences between supporters of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. This result could suggest that support for aggressive and hostile actions depends on whether those actions are perpetrated against the political system (in which case support for such actions is low in both groups) or whether they are endorsed by elected authorities,” Jaśko explained.

All research includes some limitations, and the current study is no exception. One thing the study was unable to assess was why there was a difference between Trump and Clinton supporters.

“We don’t know what psychological factors account for the differences we obtained between supporters of Trump and Clinton in their support for hostile actions of their elected candidate. None of the variables that we included in our study such as political ideology, socioeconomic status, or education explained those differences,” Jaśko said.

Future research could also examine “how the dynamic between feelings of personal significance gained from supporting one’s leader and support for hostile versus peaceful actions unfolds over time,” she noted.

The study, “Making Americans Feel Great Again? Personal Significance Predicts Political Intentions of Losers and Winners of the 2016 U.S. Election“, was authored by Katarzyna Jasko, Joanna Grzymala‐Moszczynska, Marta Maj, Marta Szastok, and Arie W. Kruglanski.

TweetSendScanShareSendPin20ShareShareShareShareShare

RELATED

Trump’s election fraud allegations linked to temporary decline in voter turnout
Donald Trump

Trump assassination attempt lowered Republican support for violence and boosted party unity

February 17, 2025

The attempted assassination of Trump didn’t ignite partisan fury—instead, Republicans became less supportive of political violence and more united, while Democrats’ attitudes remained unchanged.

Read moreDetails
The power of the point: The science of Donald Trump’s gestures
Donald Trump

The power of the point: The science of Donald Trump’s gestures

February 6, 2025

Ever noticed Donald Trump's frequent pointing? A new linguistic study reveals it's not just random.

Read moreDetails
Victimhood and Trump’s Big Lie: New study links white grievance to election skepticism
Dark Triad

Donald Trump viewed as higher in Dark Tetrad traits than Joe Biden, study finds

February 5, 2025

A study on the 2020 U.S. election examined how perceived dark tetrad traits (Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy, sadism) in Trump and Biden influenced voter behavior. Perceptions varied by political affiliation and impacted candidate support, with psychopathy and sadism decreasing it.

Read moreDetails
Identity fusion with Trump reinforced his election fraud claims and narratives of victimhood
Donald Trump

Identity fusion with Trump reinforced his election fraud claims and narratives of victimhood

January 29, 2025

Trump supporters with strong personal loyalty (identity fusion) were more likely to believe his election fraud claims, which further deepened their loyalty and led to greater support for his policies and dismissal of his legal troubles.

Read moreDetails
The psychological puzzle of Donald Trump: Eye-opening findings from 20 studies
Donald Trump

The psychological puzzle of Donald Trump: Eye-opening findings from 20 studies

January 20, 2025

Donald Trump's unexpected rise to the presidency in 2016 defied conventional political norms, driven by his populist appeal and unique communication style, which has since become a focal point for research into the psychological and social factors behind his supporters' loyalty.

Read moreDetails
January 6 quasi-experiment reveals limited impact of anti-democratic actions on Republican Party loyalty
Donald Trump

Donald Trump’s tweets predicted bursts of violence during January 6 Capitol riot, study finds

January 5, 2025

A new study has found that Trump's tweets and rally speech strongly correlated with escalating violence during the Capitol riot, with feedback loops between online rhetoric and on-the-ground aggression amplifying both the severity and duration of violent actions.

Read moreDetails
Artificial intelligence reveals Trump’s language as both uniquely simplistic and divisive among U.S. presidents
Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence reveals Trump’s language as both uniquely simplistic and divisive among U.S. presidents

October 31, 2024

Donald Trump’s speech is uniquely distinct and divisive among modern presidents, marked by shorter, simpler sentences and frequent antagonistic language, especially toward opponents, setting his rhetorical style apart from both Republican and Democratic predecessors.

Read moreDetails
A rare event in Alabama suggests Trump’s MAGA movement can overpower incumbency effects
Donald Trump

A rare event in Alabama suggests Trump’s MAGA movement can overpower incumbency effects

October 30, 2024

A new study has found that in Alabama’s rare incumbent-versus-incumbent GOP primary, alignment with Trump’s MAGA movement outweighed traditional incumbency advantages, leading to a narrow win for the more MAGA-aligned candidate.

Read moreDetails

SUBSCRIBE

Go Ad-Free! Click here to subscribe to PsyPost and support independent science journalism!

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

Surprisingly widespread brain activity supports economic decision-making, new study finds

Scientists finds altered attention-related brain connectivity in youth with anxiety

From fixed pulses to smart stimulation: Parkinson’s treatment takes a leap forward

New research challenges idea that female breasts are sexualized due to modesty norms

Mother’s childhood trauma linked to emotional and behavioral issues in her children, study finds

New study sheds light on which post-psychedelic difficulties last longest and what helps people cope

Young adults who drink heavily report more romantic highs and lows

Amphetamine scrambles the brain’s sense of time by degrading prefrontal neuron coordination

         
       
  • Contact us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and Conditions
[Do not sell my information]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy