Subscribe
The latest psychology and neuroscience discoveries.
My Account
  • Mental Health
  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • About
No Result
View All Result
PsyPost
PsyPost
No Result
View All Result
Home Exclusive Social Psychology

Orgasms activate a powerful type of unconscious learning

by Eric W. Dolan
November 1, 2016
in Social Psychology
Photo credit: WillVision

Photo credit: WillVision

Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

The experience of an orgasm can act as a Pavlovian reward that influences our future behavior, according to a review article published in the journal Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology.

The review examined the current research about brain changes during orgasm. It concluded that basic neural pathways involved in the experience of an orgasm could influence men and women’s preferences regarding romantic partners.

PsyPost interviewed Genaro Alfonso Coria Avila of Universidad Veracruzana about his research. Read his responses below:

PsyPost: Why were you interested in this topic?

Social preferences are extremely interesting and it is important to understand why we prefer what we prefer, is it innate? Is it learned? Both?

When we become adults we choose a partner, we display courtship behaviors, and if that partner chooses us in return we may have sex. Then two things can happen, either we leave and never come back, or we stay and form a couple, either short- or long-lasting, perhaps based on a rational decision, but most likely based on an unconscious powerful emotion.

What should the average person take away from your study?

“Casual sex” is unlikely to be casual unless you don’t see that person ever again. Every sexual encounter automatically triggers brain mechanisms of high attention, expectation and a powerful type of unconscious learning referred to as Pavlovian.

Google News Preferences Add PsyPost to your preferred sources

Therefore, repetitive sex outside of a romantic relationship without commitment and without emotional attachment is likely to trigger those brain mechanisms unconsciously. That means people may not realize when and how they became emotionally attached to partner they had sex with. Humans and animals use this type of learning to shape partner preferences and pair bonds in an assortative manner.

Are there any major caveats? What questions still need to be addressed?

There are many questions that need to be addressed. For instance, why don’t all the romantic sexual encounters in humans result in pair bonds? Or how many sexual encounters are required for a strong pair bond to develop and/or be maintained?

Studies on laboratory animals indicate that certain areas in the brain of monogamous rodents are better equipped with receptors for some chemicals such as oxytocin, vasopressin and dopamine, as compared to promiscuous rodents that express less of those receptors in the same brain areas. Therefore, post-orgasmic Pavlovian learning towards the partner occurs easily in monogamous rodents, but not that easily in promiscuous ones who may require many more rewarding sexual encounters to develop a partner preference or a pair bond.

The thing is, we don’t know what type we are (monogamous or promiscuous) or how likely we are to get attached to someone (post-orgasmic learning) until we try. Maybe we can use this knowledge to make our lives more harmonious or get in less trouble.

Is there anything else you would like to add?

Love functions as a signal that help us take automatic decisions (feelings) regarding how much time we want to spend with someone, how much care we take of them, how defensive we become in the presence of others, and how much we are willing to risk to be together. Those feelings can develop slowly by spending time with someone, perhaps we learn to love someone at work after several months of seeing each other. However, those feelings can develop very rapidly as a result of sex, especially after orgasm.

An orgasm is a powerful catalyst that results in enhanced brain dynamics and learning. It would be too naive for a committed person to get involved in repetitive extra-pair sex and believe that nothing is going to happen. Pavlovian learning occurs unconsciously and automatically. Indeed, sooner or later, repetitive casual sex may change into emotional sex. Accordingly, the lover becomes the beloved one, and the story starts again.

In addition to Coria-Avila, the study “The role of orgasm in the development and shaping of partner preferences” was co-authored by Deissy Herrera-Covarrubias, Nafissa Ismail, and James G. Pfaus.

Previous Post

Being fit protects against health risks caused by stress at work

Next Post

How personality drives smartphone addiction

RELATED

Scientists use “dream engineering” to boost creative problem-solving during REM sleep
Psychopathy

People with psychopathic traits don’t lack fear—they actually enjoy it

March 10, 2026
New psychology research sheds light on the mystery of deja vu
Political Psychology

Black Lives Matter protests sparked a short-term conservative backlash but ultimately shifted the 2020 election towards Democrats

March 9, 2026
Neuroscientists have pinpointed a potential biological signature for psychopathy
Neuroimaging

Neuroscientists have pinpointed a potential biological signature for psychopathy

March 9, 2026
Democrats dislike Republicans more than Republicans dislike Democrats, studies find
Personality Psychology

Supportive relationships are linked to positive personality changes

March 8, 2026
New psychology research shows that hatred is not just intense anger
Social Psychology

New research sheds light on the psychological recipe for a grudge

March 8, 2026
What is virtue signaling? The science behind moral grandstanding
Definitions

What is virtue signaling? The science behind moral grandstanding

March 8, 2026
A psychological need for certainty is associated with radical right voting
Social Psychology

Apocalyptic views are surprisingly common among Americans and predict responses to existential hazards

March 7, 2026
A psychological need for certainty is associated with radical right voting
Personality Psychology

A psychological need for certainty is associated with radical right voting

March 7, 2026

STAY CONNECTED

LATEST

How viral infections disrupt memory and thinking skills

Everyday mental quirks like déjà vu might be natural byproducts of a resting mind

New analysis shows ideology, not science, drove the global prohibition of psychedelics

People with psychopathic traits don’t lack fear—they actually enjoy it

Scientists use “dream engineering” to boost creative problem-solving during REM sleep

Therapists test an AI dating simulator to help chronically single men practice romantic skills

Women with tattoos feel more attractive but experience the same body anxieties in the bedroom

Misophonia is strongly linked to a higher risk of mental health and auditory disorders

PsyPost is a psychology and neuroscience news website dedicated to reporting the latest research on human behavior, cognition, and society. (READ MORE...)

  • Mental Health
  • Neuroimaging
  • Personality Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychopharmacology
  • Contact us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Do not sell my personal information

(c) PsyPost Media Inc

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Cognitive Science Research
  • Mental Health Research
  • Social Psychology Research
  • Drug Research
  • Relationship Research
  • About PsyPost
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

(c) PsyPost Media Inc